Prove that there exists only one prime number of the form $p^2−1$ where $p≥2$ is an integer












7












$begingroup$


By factoring $p^2 − 1$, we have $(p + 1)(p - 1)$.



I know that $p = 2$ which gives $3$ is the only solution.



However, how do I prove that $p = 2$ is the only integer which gives a prime?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because of the $p-1$ factor...
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:45










  • $begingroup$
    for any number>$2$, $p-1$ will give you a factor > $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46












  • $begingroup$
    any other solution can't be prime because it can be decomposed as a product of two numbers, neither of which equals 1 by the work you've already shown
    $endgroup$
    – cnick
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46
















7












$begingroup$


By factoring $p^2 − 1$, we have $(p + 1)(p - 1)$.



I know that $p = 2$ which gives $3$ is the only solution.



However, how do I prove that $p = 2$ is the only integer which gives a prime?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because of the $p-1$ factor...
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:45










  • $begingroup$
    for any number>$2$, $p-1$ will give you a factor > $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46












  • $begingroup$
    any other solution can't be prime because it can be decomposed as a product of two numbers, neither of which equals 1 by the work you've already shown
    $endgroup$
    – cnick
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46














7












7








7





$begingroup$


By factoring $p^2 − 1$, we have $(p + 1)(p - 1)$.



I know that $p = 2$ which gives $3$ is the only solution.



However, how do I prove that $p = 2$ is the only integer which gives a prime?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




By factoring $p^2 − 1$, we have $(p + 1)(p - 1)$.



I know that $p = 2$ which gives $3$ is the only solution.



However, how do I prove that $p = 2$ is the only integer which gives a prime?







elementary-number-theory discrete-mathematics proof-verification proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 1 '18 at 20:09









Robert Soupe

11.1k21950




11.1k21950










asked Dec 3 '15 at 1:44









Noah DengNoah Deng

8918




8918












  • $begingroup$
    Because of the $p-1$ factor...
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:45










  • $begingroup$
    for any number>$2$, $p-1$ will give you a factor > $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46












  • $begingroup$
    any other solution can't be prime because it can be decomposed as a product of two numbers, neither of which equals 1 by the work you've already shown
    $endgroup$
    – cnick
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46


















  • $begingroup$
    Because of the $p-1$ factor...
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:45










  • $begingroup$
    for any number>$2$, $p-1$ will give you a factor > $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Kushal Bhuyan
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46












  • $begingroup$
    any other solution can't be prime because it can be decomposed as a product of two numbers, neither of which equals 1 by the work you've already shown
    $endgroup$
    – cnick
    Dec 3 '15 at 1:46
















$begingroup$
Because of the $p-1$ factor...
$endgroup$
– abiessu
Dec 3 '15 at 1:45




$begingroup$
Because of the $p-1$ factor...
$endgroup$
– abiessu
Dec 3 '15 at 1:45












$begingroup$
for any number>$2$, $p-1$ will give you a factor > $1$
$endgroup$
– Kushal Bhuyan
Dec 3 '15 at 1:46






$begingroup$
for any number>$2$, $p-1$ will give you a factor > $1$
$endgroup$
– Kushal Bhuyan
Dec 3 '15 at 1:46














$begingroup$
any other solution can't be prime because it can be decomposed as a product of two numbers, neither of which equals 1 by the work you've already shown
$endgroup$
– cnick
Dec 3 '15 at 1:46




$begingroup$
any other solution can't be prime because it can be decomposed as a product of two numbers, neither of which equals 1 by the work you've already shown
$endgroup$
– cnick
Dec 3 '15 at 1:46










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

If $p>2$, both $p+1$ and $p-1$ are $>1$, hence $p^2-1$ is composite.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    In $p^2-1=(p-1)(p+1)$ give a prime number only and only if p-1 is 1 so that p+1 will be the only prime factor. So n must be 2 and its the only one which can give us a prime(3).
    I better suggest you to think about $$n^2-m=p$$ where 'n' is an natural number and m<$n^2$ such that 'p' will be a prime number.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1557483%2fprove-that-there-exists-only-one-prime-number-of-the-form-p2%25e2%2588%25921-where-p%25e2%2589%25a52-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8












      $begingroup$

      If $p>2$, both $p+1$ and $p-1$ are $>1$, hence $p^2-1$ is composite.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        8












        $begingroup$

        If $p>2$, both $p+1$ and $p-1$ are $>1$, hence $p^2-1$ is composite.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          If $p>2$, both $p+1$ and $p-1$ are $>1$, hence $p^2-1$ is composite.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If $p>2$, both $p+1$ and $p-1$ are $>1$, hence $p^2-1$ is composite.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 3 '15 at 1:47









          BernardBernard

          120k740114




          120k740114























              0












              $begingroup$

              In $p^2-1=(p-1)(p+1)$ give a prime number only and only if p-1 is 1 so that p+1 will be the only prime factor. So n must be 2 and its the only one which can give us a prime(3).
              I better suggest you to think about $$n^2-m=p$$ where 'n' is an natural number and m<$n^2$ such that 'p' will be a prime number.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                In $p^2-1=(p-1)(p+1)$ give a prime number only and only if p-1 is 1 so that p+1 will be the only prime factor. So n must be 2 and its the only one which can give us a prime(3).
                I better suggest you to think about $$n^2-m=p$$ where 'n' is an natural number and m<$n^2$ such that 'p' will be a prime number.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  In $p^2-1=(p-1)(p+1)$ give a prime number only and only if p-1 is 1 so that p+1 will be the only prime factor. So n must be 2 and its the only one which can give us a prime(3).
                  I better suggest you to think about $$n^2-m=p$$ where 'n' is an natural number and m<$n^2$ such that 'p' will be a prime number.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  In $p^2-1=(p-1)(p+1)$ give a prime number only and only if p-1 is 1 so that p+1 will be the only prime factor. So n must be 2 and its the only one which can give us a prime(3).
                  I better suggest you to think about $$n^2-m=p$$ where 'n' is an natural number and m<$n^2$ such that 'p' will be a prime number.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 23 '18 at 13:22









                  DynamoDynamo

                  104517




                  104517






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1557483%2fprove-that-there-exists-only-one-prime-number-of-the-form-p2%25e2%2588%25921-where-p%25e2%2589%25a52-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna