Approximating $sumlimits_{rsubset S}|r|!prodlimits_{xin r}x$
$begingroup$
There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$
I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
I know that:
$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$
I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.
An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:
$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
Stirling's approximation
There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics combinations approximation
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$
I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
I know that:
$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$
I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.
An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:
$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
Stirling's approximation
There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics combinations approximation
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45
$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12
1
$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37
1
$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53
2
$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$
I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
I know that:
$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$
I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.
An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:
$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
Stirling's approximation
There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics combinations approximation
$endgroup$
There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$
I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
I know that:
$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$
I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.
An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:
$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$
Stirling's approximation
There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics combinations approximation
combinatorics discrete-mathematics combinations approximation
edited Jan 22 at 11:36
Anais
asked Jan 5 at 8:55
AnaisAnais
437
437
1
$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45
$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12
1
$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37
1
$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53
2
$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12
|
show 5 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45
$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12
1
$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37
1
$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53
2
$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12
1
1
$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45
$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45
$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12
1
1
$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37
$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37
1
1
$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53
2
2
$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12
$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12
|
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$
(the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)
For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.
Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$
(I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)
The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.
I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.
(please edit or comment for any corrections)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062530%2fapproximating-sum-limits-r-subset-sr-prod-limits-x-in-rx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$
(the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)
For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.
Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$
(I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)
The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.
I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.
(please edit or comment for any corrections)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$
(the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)
For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.
Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$
(I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)
The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.
I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.
(please edit or comment for any corrections)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$
(the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)
For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.
Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$
(I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)
The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.
I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.
(please edit or comment for any corrections)
$endgroup$
We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$
(the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)
For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.
Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$
(I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)
The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.
I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.
(please edit or comment for any corrections)
answered Feb 6 at 11:11
Cardioid_Ass_22Cardioid_Ass_22
44315
44315
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062530%2fapproximating-sum-limits-r-subset-sr-prod-limits-x-in-rx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45
$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12
1
$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37
1
$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53
2
$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12