Linear programming Set cover problem with no overlap
$begingroup$
The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):
$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
Is there a way to have no overlap of element?
I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:
$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.
algorithms
$endgroup$
migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21
This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):
$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
Is there a way to have no overlap of element?
I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:
$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.
algorithms
$endgroup$
migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21
This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.
1
$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):
$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
Is there a way to have no overlap of element?
I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:
$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.
algorithms
$endgroup$
The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):
$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
Is there a way to have no overlap of element?
I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:
$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$
s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$
It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.
algorithms
algorithms
edited Jan 9 at 18:18
CuriousMind
asked Jan 6 at 10:51
CuriousMindCuriousMind
32
32
migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21
This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.
migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21
This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.
1
$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29
1
1
$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29
$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064064%2flinear-programming-set-cover-problem-with-no-overlap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064064%2flinear-programming-set-cover-problem-with-no-overlap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29