Is $P(Amid B)=P(Amid C)P(Bmid C)+P(Amid C^c)P(Bmid C^c)$ true?
$begingroup$
Let $(X_n)$ a symmetric random walk on $mathbb Z$. I was trying to compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=1)$ and I was wondering if $$mathbb P(Amid B)=mathbb P(Amid C)mathbb P(Bmid C)+mathbb P(Amid C^c)mathbb P(Bmid C^c)$$ was true or not. I never see this formula anywhere, but in an other way these looks quite correct, and thus we would get $$mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$$
$$=mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=2)mathbb P(X_2mid X_0=0)+mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=0)mathbb P(X_2=0mid X_0=0)=...$$Also, I was wondering what for example $mathbb P(X_3=1)$ would represent. For example $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ is clear, but now, in computing $mathbb P(X_3=1)$, $X_0$ could be anything. So which event would be ${X_3=1}$.
probability
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $(X_n)$ a symmetric random walk on $mathbb Z$. I was trying to compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=1)$ and I was wondering if $$mathbb P(Amid B)=mathbb P(Amid C)mathbb P(Bmid C)+mathbb P(Amid C^c)mathbb P(Bmid C^c)$$ was true or not. I never see this formula anywhere, but in an other way these looks quite correct, and thus we would get $$mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$$
$$=mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=2)mathbb P(X_2mid X_0=0)+mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=0)mathbb P(X_2=0mid X_0=0)=...$$Also, I was wondering what for example $mathbb P(X_3=1)$ would represent. For example $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ is clear, but now, in computing $mathbb P(X_3=1)$, $X_0$ could be anything. So which event would be ${X_3=1}$.
probability
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $C$ is independent of both $A$ and $B$, then your claim would be $P(Amid B)=2P(A)P(B)$. That doesn't sound true (It's easy to come up with events where the product of their probability exceeds $frac12$). It would also imply that $P(Amid B)=P(Bmid A)$ which is also very far from true.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 2 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Sorry but where do you see that the RHS of the identity you suggest in your first point involves $P(Acap B)$, visibly or invisibly, in any way? Thus, how can the RHS equal $P(Amid B)$ in general?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@Did: So how would you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm: Thank you, so how do you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
2
$begingroup$
Sorry but the question is rather how you would approach it... An obvious start is, using the Markov property, $$P(X_3=xmid X_0=z)=sum_{y,u}P(X_3=x,X_2=y,X_1=umid X_0=0)$$ where each term in the sum on the RHS is $$P(X_3=xmid X_2=y)P(X_2=ymid X_1=u)P(X_1=umid X_0=0)$$
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:58
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $(X_n)$ a symmetric random walk on $mathbb Z$. I was trying to compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=1)$ and I was wondering if $$mathbb P(Amid B)=mathbb P(Amid C)mathbb P(Bmid C)+mathbb P(Amid C^c)mathbb P(Bmid C^c)$$ was true or not. I never see this formula anywhere, but in an other way these looks quite correct, and thus we would get $$mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$$
$$=mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=2)mathbb P(X_2mid X_0=0)+mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=0)mathbb P(X_2=0mid X_0=0)=...$$Also, I was wondering what for example $mathbb P(X_3=1)$ would represent. For example $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ is clear, but now, in computing $mathbb P(X_3=1)$, $X_0$ could be anything. So which event would be ${X_3=1}$.
probability
$endgroup$
Let $(X_n)$ a symmetric random walk on $mathbb Z$. I was trying to compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=1)$ and I was wondering if $$mathbb P(Amid B)=mathbb P(Amid C)mathbb P(Bmid C)+mathbb P(Amid C^c)mathbb P(Bmid C^c)$$ was true or not. I never see this formula anywhere, but in an other way these looks quite correct, and thus we would get $$mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$$
$$=mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=2)mathbb P(X_2mid X_0=0)+mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_2=0)mathbb P(X_2=0mid X_0=0)=...$$Also, I was wondering what for example $mathbb P(X_3=1)$ would represent. For example $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ is clear, but now, in computing $mathbb P(X_3=1)$, $X_0$ could be anything. So which event would be ${X_3=1}$.
probability
probability
edited Jan 2 at 18:02
Bernard
122k740116
122k740116
asked Jan 2 at 14:47
NewMathNewMath
4059
4059
$begingroup$
If $C$ is independent of both $A$ and $B$, then your claim would be $P(Amid B)=2P(A)P(B)$. That doesn't sound true (It's easy to come up with events where the product of their probability exceeds $frac12$). It would also imply that $P(Amid B)=P(Bmid A)$ which is also very far from true.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 2 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Sorry but where do you see that the RHS of the identity you suggest in your first point involves $P(Acap B)$, visibly or invisibly, in any way? Thus, how can the RHS equal $P(Amid B)$ in general?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@Did: So how would you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm: Thank you, so how do you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
2
$begingroup$
Sorry but the question is rather how you would approach it... An obvious start is, using the Markov property, $$P(X_3=xmid X_0=z)=sum_{y,u}P(X_3=x,X_2=y,X_1=umid X_0=0)$$ where each term in the sum on the RHS is $$P(X_3=xmid X_2=y)P(X_2=ymid X_1=u)P(X_1=umid X_0=0)$$
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:58
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
If $C$ is independent of both $A$ and $B$, then your claim would be $P(Amid B)=2P(A)P(B)$. That doesn't sound true (It's easy to come up with events where the product of their probability exceeds $frac12$). It would also imply that $P(Amid B)=P(Bmid A)$ which is also very far from true.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 2 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Sorry but where do you see that the RHS of the identity you suggest in your first point involves $P(Acap B)$, visibly or invisibly, in any way? Thus, how can the RHS equal $P(Amid B)$ in general?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@Did: So how would you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm: Thank you, so how do you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
2
$begingroup$
Sorry but the question is rather how you would approach it... An obvious start is, using the Markov property, $$P(X_3=xmid X_0=z)=sum_{y,u}P(X_3=x,X_2=y,X_1=umid X_0=0)$$ where each term in the sum on the RHS is $$P(X_3=xmid X_2=y)P(X_2=ymid X_1=u)P(X_1=umid X_0=0)$$
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:58
$begingroup$
If $C$ is independent of both $A$ and $B$, then your claim would be $P(Amid B)=2P(A)P(B)$. That doesn't sound true (It's easy to come up with events where the product of their probability exceeds $frac12$). It would also imply that $P(Amid B)=P(Bmid A)$ which is also very far from true.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 2 at 14:52
$begingroup$
If $C$ is independent of both $A$ and $B$, then your claim would be $P(Amid B)=2P(A)P(B)$. That doesn't sound true (It's easy to come up with events where the product of their probability exceeds $frac12$). It would also imply that $P(Amid B)=P(Bmid A)$ which is also very far from true.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 2 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Sorry but where do you see that the RHS of the identity you suggest in your first point involves $P(Acap B)$, visibly or invisibly, in any way? Thus, how can the RHS equal $P(Amid B)$ in general?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:53
$begingroup$
Sorry but where do you see that the RHS of the identity you suggest in your first point involves $P(Acap B)$, visibly or invisibly, in any way? Thus, how can the RHS equal $P(Amid B)$ in general?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@Did: So how would you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@Did: So how would you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm: Thank you, so how do you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm: Thank you, so how do you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
2
2
$begingroup$
Sorry but the question is rather how you would approach it... An obvious start is, using the Markov property, $$P(X_3=xmid X_0=z)=sum_{y,u}P(X_3=x,X_2=y,X_1=umid X_0=0)$$ where each term in the sum on the RHS is $$P(X_3=xmid X_2=y)P(X_2=ymid X_1=u)P(X_1=umid X_0=0)$$
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:58
$begingroup$
Sorry but the question is rather how you would approach it... An obvious start is, using the Markov property, $$P(X_3=xmid X_0=z)=sum_{y,u}P(X_3=x,X_2=y,X_1=umid X_0=0)$$ where each term in the sum on the RHS is $$P(X_3=xmid X_2=y)P(X_2=ymid X_1=u)P(X_1=umid X_0=0)$$
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:58
|
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If your identity were true it were true for $C= {rm full space}$. This would mean that $P(A|B)=P(A)P(B)$ for arbitrary $A$ and $B$, which is obviously wrong.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059551%2fis-pa-mid-b-pa-mid-cpb-mid-cpa-mid-ccpb-mid-cc-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If your identity were true it were true for $C= {rm full space}$. This would mean that $P(A|B)=P(A)P(B)$ for arbitrary $A$ and $B$, which is obviously wrong.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your identity were true it were true for $C= {rm full space}$. This would mean that $P(A|B)=P(A)P(B)$ for arbitrary $A$ and $B$, which is obviously wrong.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your identity were true it were true for $C= {rm full space}$. This would mean that $P(A|B)=P(A)P(B)$ for arbitrary $A$ and $B$, which is obviously wrong.
$endgroup$
If your identity were true it were true for $C= {rm full space}$. This would mean that $P(A|B)=P(A)P(B)$ for arbitrary $A$ and $B$, which is obviously wrong.
answered Jan 2 at 18:40
Christian BlatterChristian Blatter
175k8115327
175k8115327
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059551%2fis-pa-mid-b-pa-mid-cpb-mid-cpa-mid-ccpb-mid-cc-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If $C$ is independent of both $A$ and $B$, then your claim would be $P(Amid B)=2P(A)P(B)$. That doesn't sound true (It's easy to come up with events where the product of their probability exceeds $frac12$). It would also imply that $P(Amid B)=P(Bmid A)$ which is also very far from true.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 2 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Sorry but where do you see that the RHS of the identity you suggest in your first point involves $P(Acap B)$, visibly or invisibly, in any way? Thus, how can the RHS equal $P(Amid B)$ in general?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@Did: So how would you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm: Thank you, so how do you compute $mathbb P(X_3=1mid X_0=0)$ ?
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 2 at 14:55
2
$begingroup$
Sorry but the question is rather how you would approach it... An obvious start is, using the Markov property, $$P(X_3=xmid X_0=z)=sum_{y,u}P(X_3=x,X_2=y,X_1=umid X_0=0)$$ where each term in the sum on the RHS is $$P(X_3=xmid X_2=y)P(X_2=ymid X_1=u)P(X_1=umid X_0=0)$$
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 2 at 14:58