Show existence of $sigma$












1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a normal extension of $F$ and $fin F[x]$ be irreducible over $F$.



Let $g_1, g_2$ be irreducible factors of $f$ in the ring $K[x]$.



How could we show that there exists $sigma in G(K/F)$ such that $g_2=sigma (g_1)$ ?



Could you give me a hint for that?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    IMHO the same question has appeared here. No answers, though. I'll keep looking...
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    A more promising match. Further checking required to decide whether this is a dupe. May be this?
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:44
















1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a normal extension of $F$ and $fin F[x]$ be irreducible over $F$.



Let $g_1, g_2$ be irreducible factors of $f$ in the ring $K[x]$.



How could we show that there exists $sigma in G(K/F)$ such that $g_2=sigma (g_1)$ ?



Could you give me a hint for that?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    IMHO the same question has appeared here. No answers, though. I'll keep looking...
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    A more promising match. Further checking required to decide whether this is a dupe. May be this?
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:44














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a normal extension of $F$ and $fin F[x]$ be irreducible over $F$.



Let $g_1, g_2$ be irreducible factors of $f$ in the ring $K[x]$.



How could we show that there exists $sigma in G(K/F)$ such that $g_2=sigma (g_1)$ ?



Could you give me a hint for that?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $K$ be a normal extension of $F$ and $fin F[x]$ be irreducible over $F$.



Let $g_1, g_2$ be irreducible factors of $f$ in the ring $K[x]$.



How could we show that there exists $sigma in G(K/F)$ such that $g_2=sigma (g_1)$ ?



Could you give me a hint for that?







abstract-algebra galois-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Oct 29 '18 at 19:42









Mary StarMary Star

3,10282470




3,10282470












  • $begingroup$
    IMHO the same question has appeared here. No answers, though. I'll keep looking...
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    A more promising match. Further checking required to decide whether this is a dupe. May be this?
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:44


















  • $begingroup$
    IMHO the same question has appeared here. No answers, though. I'll keep looking...
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:39










  • $begingroup$
    A more promising match. Further checking required to decide whether this is a dupe. May be this?
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Oct 30 '18 at 6:44
















$begingroup$
IMHO the same question has appeared here. No answers, though. I'll keep looking...
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 30 '18 at 6:39




$begingroup$
IMHO the same question has appeared here. No answers, though. I'll keep looking...
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 30 '18 at 6:39












$begingroup$
A more promising match. Further checking required to decide whether this is a dupe. May be this?
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 30 '18 at 6:44




$begingroup$
A more promising match. Further checking required to decide whether this is a dupe. May be this?
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 30 '18 at 6:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $L/K$ be the splitting field of $f$. Let $alpha_1$ be a root of $g_1$ and $alpha_2$ be a root of $g_2$. From field theory, since $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ have the same minimal polynomial over $F$ and $L/F$ is normal, we get $sigma in operatorname{Aut}(L/F)$ such that $sigma(alpha_1) = alpha_2$. Since $K/F$ is normal, $sigma|_K in operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$, still with $sigma|_K(alpha_1) = alpha_2$.



Now $g_2$ is irreducible in $K$ and $g_2(alpha_2) = 0 in L$, so $g_2$ is the minimal poolynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$. However, $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also irreducible in $K$, and $(sigma|_K(g_1))(alpha_2) = (sigma|_K(g_1))(sigma(alpha_1)) = sigma|_K(g_1(alpha_1)) = 0$, so $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also the minimal polynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$.



Since minimal polynomial is unique, we conclude $sigma|_K(g_1) = g_2$.





A counter-example when $K/F$ is not normal is $F=Bbb Q$ and $K=Bbb Q(sqrt[3]2)$ and $f = X^3-2 in F[X]$, with $f = (X-sqrt[3]2)(X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4) in K[X]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is indeed the reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Feb 26 at 18:33











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2976583%2fshow-existence-of-sigma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Let $L/K$ be the splitting field of $f$. Let $alpha_1$ be a root of $g_1$ and $alpha_2$ be a root of $g_2$. From field theory, since $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ have the same minimal polynomial over $F$ and $L/F$ is normal, we get $sigma in operatorname{Aut}(L/F)$ such that $sigma(alpha_1) = alpha_2$. Since $K/F$ is normal, $sigma|_K in operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$, still with $sigma|_K(alpha_1) = alpha_2$.



Now $g_2$ is irreducible in $K$ and $g_2(alpha_2) = 0 in L$, so $g_2$ is the minimal poolynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$. However, $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also irreducible in $K$, and $(sigma|_K(g_1))(alpha_2) = (sigma|_K(g_1))(sigma(alpha_1)) = sigma|_K(g_1(alpha_1)) = 0$, so $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also the minimal polynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$.



Since minimal polynomial is unique, we conclude $sigma|_K(g_1) = g_2$.





A counter-example when $K/F$ is not normal is $F=Bbb Q$ and $K=Bbb Q(sqrt[3]2)$ and $f = X^3-2 in F[X]$, with $f = (X-sqrt[3]2)(X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4) in K[X]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is indeed the reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Feb 26 at 18:33
















1












$begingroup$

Let $L/K$ be the splitting field of $f$. Let $alpha_1$ be a root of $g_1$ and $alpha_2$ be a root of $g_2$. From field theory, since $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ have the same minimal polynomial over $F$ and $L/F$ is normal, we get $sigma in operatorname{Aut}(L/F)$ such that $sigma(alpha_1) = alpha_2$. Since $K/F$ is normal, $sigma|_K in operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$, still with $sigma|_K(alpha_1) = alpha_2$.



Now $g_2$ is irreducible in $K$ and $g_2(alpha_2) = 0 in L$, so $g_2$ is the minimal poolynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$. However, $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also irreducible in $K$, and $(sigma|_K(g_1))(alpha_2) = (sigma|_K(g_1))(sigma(alpha_1)) = sigma|_K(g_1(alpha_1)) = 0$, so $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also the minimal polynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$.



Since minimal polynomial is unique, we conclude $sigma|_K(g_1) = g_2$.





A counter-example when $K/F$ is not normal is $F=Bbb Q$ and $K=Bbb Q(sqrt[3]2)$ and $f = X^3-2 in F[X]$, with $f = (X-sqrt[3]2)(X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4) in K[X]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is indeed the reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Feb 26 at 18:33














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Let $L/K$ be the splitting field of $f$. Let $alpha_1$ be a root of $g_1$ and $alpha_2$ be a root of $g_2$. From field theory, since $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ have the same minimal polynomial over $F$ and $L/F$ is normal, we get $sigma in operatorname{Aut}(L/F)$ such that $sigma(alpha_1) = alpha_2$. Since $K/F$ is normal, $sigma|_K in operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$, still with $sigma|_K(alpha_1) = alpha_2$.



Now $g_2$ is irreducible in $K$ and $g_2(alpha_2) = 0 in L$, so $g_2$ is the minimal poolynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$. However, $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also irreducible in $K$, and $(sigma|_K(g_1))(alpha_2) = (sigma|_K(g_1))(sigma(alpha_1)) = sigma|_K(g_1(alpha_1)) = 0$, so $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also the minimal polynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$.



Since minimal polynomial is unique, we conclude $sigma|_K(g_1) = g_2$.





A counter-example when $K/F$ is not normal is $F=Bbb Q$ and $K=Bbb Q(sqrt[3]2)$ and $f = X^3-2 in F[X]$, with $f = (X-sqrt[3]2)(X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4) in K[X]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let $L/K$ be the splitting field of $f$. Let $alpha_1$ be a root of $g_1$ and $alpha_2$ be a root of $g_2$. From field theory, since $alpha_1$ and $alpha_2$ have the same minimal polynomial over $F$ and $L/F$ is normal, we get $sigma in operatorname{Aut}(L/F)$ such that $sigma(alpha_1) = alpha_2$. Since $K/F$ is normal, $sigma|_K in operatorname{Aut}(K/F)$, still with $sigma|_K(alpha_1) = alpha_2$.



Now $g_2$ is irreducible in $K$ and $g_2(alpha_2) = 0 in L$, so $g_2$ is the minimal poolynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$. However, $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also irreducible in $K$, and $(sigma|_K(g_1))(alpha_2) = (sigma|_K(g_1))(sigma(alpha_1)) = sigma|_K(g_1(alpha_1)) = 0$, so $sigma|_K(g_1)$ is also the minimal polynomial of $alpha_2$ over $K$.



Since minimal polynomial is unique, we conclude $sigma|_K(g_1) = g_2$.





A counter-example when $K/F$ is not normal is $F=Bbb Q$ and $K=Bbb Q(sqrt[3]2)$ and $f = X^3-2 in F[X]$, with $f = (X-sqrt[3]2)(X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4) in K[X]$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 1 at 23:53









Kenny LauKenny Lau

20k2160




20k2160












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is indeed the reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Feb 26 at 18:33


















  • $begingroup$
    Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Feb 26 at 18:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that is indeed the reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Feb 26 at 18:33
















$begingroup$
Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Feb 26 at 18:02




$begingroup$
Sorry but could you explain why this counter-example works? Namely why there is no such automorphism?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Feb 26 at 18:02












$begingroup$
Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Feb 26 at 18:10




$begingroup$
Am I right it is because your irreducible factors of $f$, namely $X-sqrt[3]2$ and $X^2+sqrt[3]2X+sqrt[3]4$ have different degrees?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Feb 26 at 18:10




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, that is indeed the reason.
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Feb 26 at 18:33




$begingroup$
Yes, that is indeed the reason.
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Feb 26 at 18:33


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2976583%2fshow-existence-of-sigma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Måne

Storängen

VLT Carioca