Using Hölder's inequality to prove statement for a specific vector $u$












0












$begingroup$



Suppose that $uinmathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$ is such that $sum_{i=1}^n u_i=0$.



Prove that $|u^top v|leq||u||_ 1(frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2)$, where $v_{max}=max |v_i|$ and $v_{min}=min|v_i|$ for any $v in mathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$.




I tried to prove this similarly to how my professor did it, using the fact that $|u^top(v-alpha e)|=|u^top v|$ if $e=(1,cdots,1)$ and $alpha$ is any real number because the sum of the components of $u$ is $0$. Then I used Hölder's inequality to get $|u^top v|leq||u||_1||v-alpha e||_infty$, and this is where I got stuck.



My professor does not justify why $$inf ||v-alpha e||_infty =frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2.$$ I guess that the average of the maximum and minimum values of $v$ could minimize $||cdot||_infty$, but I'm not really convinced without a proper explanation and I can't prove it myself.



I guess what we really need to find is $$lim_{ptoinfty} inf_alpha (sum_{i=1}^n |v_i - alpha|^p)^frac1p $$ (because the limit of the p-norms is $||cdot||_infty$), which does not sound so easy and straightforward, though maybe it actually is and I'm not seeing how.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Suppose that $uinmathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$ is such that $sum_{i=1}^n u_i=0$.



    Prove that $|u^top v|leq||u||_ 1(frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2)$, where $v_{max}=max |v_i|$ and $v_{min}=min|v_i|$ for any $v in mathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$.




    I tried to prove this similarly to how my professor did it, using the fact that $|u^top(v-alpha e)|=|u^top v|$ if $e=(1,cdots,1)$ and $alpha$ is any real number because the sum of the components of $u$ is $0$. Then I used Hölder's inequality to get $|u^top v|leq||u||_1||v-alpha e||_infty$, and this is where I got stuck.



    My professor does not justify why $$inf ||v-alpha e||_infty =frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2.$$ I guess that the average of the maximum and minimum values of $v$ could minimize $||cdot||_infty$, but I'm not really convinced without a proper explanation and I can't prove it myself.



    I guess what we really need to find is $$lim_{ptoinfty} inf_alpha (sum_{i=1}^n |v_i - alpha|^p)^frac1p $$ (because the limit of the p-norms is $||cdot||_infty$), which does not sound so easy and straightforward, though maybe it actually is and I'm not seeing how.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Suppose that $uinmathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$ is such that $sum_{i=1}^n u_i=0$.



      Prove that $|u^top v|leq||u||_ 1(frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2)$, where $v_{max}=max |v_i|$ and $v_{min}=min|v_i|$ for any $v in mathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$.




      I tried to prove this similarly to how my professor did it, using the fact that $|u^top(v-alpha e)|=|u^top v|$ if $e=(1,cdots,1)$ and $alpha$ is any real number because the sum of the components of $u$ is $0$. Then I used Hölder's inequality to get $|u^top v|leq||u||_1||v-alpha e||_infty$, and this is where I got stuck.



      My professor does not justify why $$inf ||v-alpha e||_infty =frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2.$$ I guess that the average of the maximum and minimum values of $v$ could minimize $||cdot||_infty$, but I'm not really convinced without a proper explanation and I can't prove it myself.



      I guess what we really need to find is $$lim_{ptoinfty} inf_alpha (sum_{i=1}^n |v_i - alpha|^p)^frac1p $$ (because the limit of the p-norms is $||cdot||_infty$), which does not sound so easy and straightforward, though maybe it actually is and I'm not seeing how.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Suppose that $uinmathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$ is such that $sum_{i=1}^n u_i=0$.



      Prove that $|u^top v|leq||u||_ 1(frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2)$, where $v_{max}=max |v_i|$ and $v_{min}=min|v_i|$ for any $v in mathbb{R}^{ntimes 1}$.




      I tried to prove this similarly to how my professor did it, using the fact that $|u^top(v-alpha e)|=|u^top v|$ if $e=(1,cdots,1)$ and $alpha$ is any real number because the sum of the components of $u$ is $0$. Then I used Hölder's inequality to get $|u^top v|leq||u||_1||v-alpha e||_infty$, and this is where I got stuck.



      My professor does not justify why $$inf ||v-alpha e||_infty =frac{v_{max}-v_{min}}2.$$ I guess that the average of the maximum and minimum values of $v$ could minimize $||cdot||_infty$, but I'm not really convinced without a proper explanation and I can't prove it myself.



      I guess what we really need to find is $$lim_{ptoinfty} inf_alpha (sum_{i=1}^n |v_i - alpha|^p)^frac1p $$ (because the limit of the p-norms is $||cdot||_infty$), which does not sound so easy and straightforward, though maybe it actually is and I'm not seeing how.







      real-analysis linear-algebra matrices






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 2 at 20:27









      Namaste

      1




      1










      asked Jan 2 at 19:28









      AstlyDichrarAstlyDichrar

      41738




      41738






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Note that
          $$
          v_{min}-alpha leq v_i-alpha leq v_max-alpha,
          $$
          and thus
          $$
          max_i |v_i -alpha|= max{|v_min -alpha|, |v_max - alpha|}.
          $$
          The right-hand side is the maximum of $d(v_min, alpha)$ and $d(v_max, alpha)$. One can see that the minimizer of it is $$alpha =frac{v_min + v_max}{2}$$ and $$
          inf_{alphain mathbb{R}} |v - alpha e|_infty = frac{v_max - v_min}{2}
          $$
          follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
            $endgroup$
            – AstlyDichrar
            Jan 2 at 22:19











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059869%2fusing-h%25c3%25b6lders-inequality-to-prove-statement-for-a-specific-vector-u%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Note that
          $$
          v_{min}-alpha leq v_i-alpha leq v_max-alpha,
          $$
          and thus
          $$
          max_i |v_i -alpha|= max{|v_min -alpha|, |v_max - alpha|}.
          $$
          The right-hand side is the maximum of $d(v_min, alpha)$ and $d(v_max, alpha)$. One can see that the minimizer of it is $$alpha =frac{v_min + v_max}{2}$$ and $$
          inf_{alphain mathbb{R}} |v - alpha e|_infty = frac{v_max - v_min}{2}
          $$
          follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
            $endgroup$
            – AstlyDichrar
            Jan 2 at 22:19
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Note that
          $$
          v_{min}-alpha leq v_i-alpha leq v_max-alpha,
          $$
          and thus
          $$
          max_i |v_i -alpha|= max{|v_min -alpha|, |v_max - alpha|}.
          $$
          The right-hand side is the maximum of $d(v_min, alpha)$ and $d(v_max, alpha)$. One can see that the minimizer of it is $$alpha =frac{v_min + v_max}{2}$$ and $$
          inf_{alphain mathbb{R}} |v - alpha e|_infty = frac{v_max - v_min}{2}
          $$
          follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
            $endgroup$
            – AstlyDichrar
            Jan 2 at 22:19














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Note that
          $$
          v_{min}-alpha leq v_i-alpha leq v_max-alpha,
          $$
          and thus
          $$
          max_i |v_i -alpha|= max{|v_min -alpha|, |v_max - alpha|}.
          $$
          The right-hand side is the maximum of $d(v_min, alpha)$ and $d(v_max, alpha)$. One can see that the minimizer of it is $$alpha =frac{v_min + v_max}{2}$$ and $$
          inf_{alphain mathbb{R}} |v - alpha e|_infty = frac{v_max - v_min}{2}
          $$
          follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Note that
          $$
          v_{min}-alpha leq v_i-alpha leq v_max-alpha,
          $$
          and thus
          $$
          max_i |v_i -alpha|= max{|v_min -alpha|, |v_max - alpha|}.
          $$
          The right-hand side is the maximum of $d(v_min, alpha)$ and $d(v_max, alpha)$. One can see that the minimizer of it is $$alpha =frac{v_min + v_max}{2}$$ and $$
          inf_{alphain mathbb{R}} |v - alpha e|_infty = frac{v_max - v_min}{2}
          $$
          follows.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 2 at 19:48









          SongSong

          16.6k11043




          16.6k11043












          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
            $endgroup$
            – AstlyDichrar
            Jan 2 at 22:19


















          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
            $endgroup$
            – AstlyDichrar
            Jan 2 at 22:19
















          $begingroup$
          Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
          $endgroup$
          – AstlyDichrar
          Jan 2 at 22:19




          $begingroup$
          Oh, I get it now. We want to pick an $alpha$ that makes both terms we want to find the maximum of be the same will minimize the maximum. Thanks for the explanation!
          $endgroup$
          – AstlyDichrar
          Jan 2 at 22:19


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059869%2fusing-h%25c3%25b6lders-inequality-to-prove-statement-for-a-specific-vector-u%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Måne

          Storängen

          VLT Carioca