Computing marginal distribution












0












$begingroup$


Assume $x$ is distributed with $F(x)=x^2$ for $0leq x leq 1$ and $cmid x sim U[0, lambda cdot x + 1-lambda]$ for some $0 < lambda < 1$. I am trying to find the marginal distribution of c.



The joint density function should be given by $frac{2x}{lambda cdot x + 1-lambda}$ whenever $x in [0,1]$ and $c in [0, lambda cdot x + 1- lambda]$, right?



I tried integrating out $x$ next, but I am unsure about the boundaries. Simply letting $x geq frac{c+lambda -1}{lambda}$ seems not to be correct, as this lower bound could be negative?



I think should be getting a marginal density for $c$ that integrates to 1 on the support $[0,1]$, regardless of what value $lambda$ takes, but it never worked no matter what I tried...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it is helpful to take a random sample from the joint distribution (randomly selecting an x followed by a value of c conditional on x) and plot the (x,c) pairs along with a histogram of the resulting c values.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 7:03










  • $begingroup$
    Another hint: Look at the joint distribution and first find $Pr(C leq c)$ as a piecewise function which depends on $c$ being above or below $1-lambda$. Then differentiate the two pieces to get the marginal pdf for $C$.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 17:07


















0












$begingroup$


Assume $x$ is distributed with $F(x)=x^2$ for $0leq x leq 1$ and $cmid x sim U[0, lambda cdot x + 1-lambda]$ for some $0 < lambda < 1$. I am trying to find the marginal distribution of c.



The joint density function should be given by $frac{2x}{lambda cdot x + 1-lambda}$ whenever $x in [0,1]$ and $c in [0, lambda cdot x + 1- lambda]$, right?



I tried integrating out $x$ next, but I am unsure about the boundaries. Simply letting $x geq frac{c+lambda -1}{lambda}$ seems not to be correct, as this lower bound could be negative?



I think should be getting a marginal density for $c$ that integrates to 1 on the support $[0,1]$, regardless of what value $lambda$ takes, but it never worked no matter what I tried...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it is helpful to take a random sample from the joint distribution (randomly selecting an x followed by a value of c conditional on x) and plot the (x,c) pairs along with a histogram of the resulting c values.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 7:03










  • $begingroup$
    Another hint: Look at the joint distribution and first find $Pr(C leq c)$ as a piecewise function which depends on $c$ being above or below $1-lambda$. Then differentiate the two pieces to get the marginal pdf for $C$.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 17:07
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Assume $x$ is distributed with $F(x)=x^2$ for $0leq x leq 1$ and $cmid x sim U[0, lambda cdot x + 1-lambda]$ for some $0 < lambda < 1$. I am trying to find the marginal distribution of c.



The joint density function should be given by $frac{2x}{lambda cdot x + 1-lambda}$ whenever $x in [0,1]$ and $c in [0, lambda cdot x + 1- lambda]$, right?



I tried integrating out $x$ next, but I am unsure about the boundaries. Simply letting $x geq frac{c+lambda -1}{lambda}$ seems not to be correct, as this lower bound could be negative?



I think should be getting a marginal density for $c$ that integrates to 1 on the support $[0,1]$, regardless of what value $lambda$ takes, but it never worked no matter what I tried...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Assume $x$ is distributed with $F(x)=x^2$ for $0leq x leq 1$ and $cmid x sim U[0, lambda cdot x + 1-lambda]$ for some $0 < lambda < 1$. I am trying to find the marginal distribution of c.



The joint density function should be given by $frac{2x}{lambda cdot x + 1-lambda}$ whenever $x in [0,1]$ and $c in [0, lambda cdot x + 1- lambda]$, right?



I tried integrating out $x$ next, but I am unsure about the boundaries. Simply letting $x geq frac{c+lambda -1}{lambda}$ seems not to be correct, as this lower bound could be negative?



I think should be getting a marginal density for $c$ that integrates to 1 on the support $[0,1]$, regardless of what value $lambda$ takes, but it never worked no matter what I tried...







real-analysis probability integration probability-theory density-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 11 at 3:39









user509037user509037

836




836












  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it is helpful to take a random sample from the joint distribution (randomly selecting an x followed by a value of c conditional on x) and plot the (x,c) pairs along with a histogram of the resulting c values.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 7:03










  • $begingroup$
    Another hint: Look at the joint distribution and first find $Pr(C leq c)$ as a piecewise function which depends on $c$ being above or below $1-lambda$. Then differentiate the two pieces to get the marginal pdf for $C$.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 17:07




















  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it is helpful to take a random sample from the joint distribution (randomly selecting an x followed by a value of c conditional on x) and plot the (x,c) pairs along with a histogram of the resulting c values.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 7:03










  • $begingroup$
    Another hint: Look at the joint distribution and first find $Pr(C leq c)$ as a piecewise function which depends on $c$ being above or below $1-lambda$. Then differentiate the two pieces to get the marginal pdf for $C$.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Jan 11 at 17:07


















$begingroup$
Sometimes it is helpful to take a random sample from the joint distribution (randomly selecting an x followed by a value of c conditional on x) and plot the (x,c) pairs along with a histogram of the resulting c values.
$endgroup$
– JimB
Jan 11 at 7:03




$begingroup$
Sometimes it is helpful to take a random sample from the joint distribution (randomly selecting an x followed by a value of c conditional on x) and plot the (x,c) pairs along with a histogram of the resulting c values.
$endgroup$
– JimB
Jan 11 at 7:03












$begingroup$
Another hint: Look at the joint distribution and first find $Pr(C leq c)$ as a piecewise function which depends on $c$ being above or below $1-lambda$. Then differentiate the two pieces to get the marginal pdf for $C$.
$endgroup$
– JimB
Jan 11 at 17:07






$begingroup$
Another hint: Look at the joint distribution and first find $Pr(C leq c)$ as a piecewise function which depends on $c$ being above or below $1-lambda$. Then differentiate the two pieces to get the marginal pdf for $C$.
$endgroup$
– JimB
Jan 11 at 17:07












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

First look at the sample space associated with a non-zero joint density:



Sample space for joint probability



The $1-lambda$ location on the figure is for $lambda=0.3$ but it is meant to be a general y-intercept of upper boundary for $c$.



We see that to construct the value of $Pr[Cleq c_0]$ we need to consider two cases: (1) $c_0 <= 1-lambda$ and $c_0 > 1-lambda$.



case where c0 leq 1 - lambda



$$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 leq c_0leq 1-lambda leq 1]=int _0^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)} dc dx = frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2}$$



case where c0 gt 1 - lambda



$$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=\ int _0^{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}int _0^{1-lambda (1-x)}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx+int _{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx =\
frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2}$$



So



$$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=begin{array}{cc}
{ &
begin{array}{cc}
frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0leq 1-lambda <1 \
frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda <c_0<1 \
end{array}
\
end{array}$$



Now take the derivative with respect to $c_0$ to obtain the marginal probability density function for $C$:



$$f(c)=begin{array}{cc}
{ &
begin{array}{cc}
frac{2 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0 leq 1-lambda \
-frac{2 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda< c_0<1 \
end{array}
\
end{array}$$



Here is what the marginal pdf for $C$ looks like for various values of $lambda$:



PDF of c for various values of lambda






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069461%2fcomputing-marginal-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    First look at the sample space associated with a non-zero joint density:



    Sample space for joint probability



    The $1-lambda$ location on the figure is for $lambda=0.3$ but it is meant to be a general y-intercept of upper boundary for $c$.



    We see that to construct the value of $Pr[Cleq c_0]$ we need to consider two cases: (1) $c_0 <= 1-lambda$ and $c_0 > 1-lambda$.



    case where c0 leq 1 - lambda



    $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 leq c_0leq 1-lambda leq 1]=int _0^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)} dc dx = frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2}$$



    case where c0 gt 1 - lambda



    $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=\ int _0^{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}int _0^{1-lambda (1-x)}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx+int _{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx =\
    frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2}$$



    So



    $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=begin{array}{cc}
    { &
    begin{array}{cc}
    frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0leq 1-lambda <1 \
    frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda <c_0<1 \
    end{array}
    \
    end{array}$$



    Now take the derivative with respect to $c_0$ to obtain the marginal probability density function for $C$:



    $$f(c)=begin{array}{cc}
    { &
    begin{array}{cc}
    frac{2 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0 leq 1-lambda \
    -frac{2 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda< c_0<1 \
    end{array}
    \
    end{array}$$



    Here is what the marginal pdf for $C$ looks like for various values of $lambda$:



    PDF of c for various values of lambda






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      First look at the sample space associated with a non-zero joint density:



      Sample space for joint probability



      The $1-lambda$ location on the figure is for $lambda=0.3$ but it is meant to be a general y-intercept of upper boundary for $c$.



      We see that to construct the value of $Pr[Cleq c_0]$ we need to consider two cases: (1) $c_0 <= 1-lambda$ and $c_0 > 1-lambda$.



      case where c0 leq 1 - lambda



      $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 leq c_0leq 1-lambda leq 1]=int _0^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)} dc dx = frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2}$$



      case where c0 gt 1 - lambda



      $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=\ int _0^{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}int _0^{1-lambda (1-x)}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx+int _{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx =\
      frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2}$$



      So



      $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=begin{array}{cc}
      { &
      begin{array}{cc}
      frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0leq 1-lambda <1 \
      frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda <c_0<1 \
      end{array}
      \
      end{array}$$



      Now take the derivative with respect to $c_0$ to obtain the marginal probability density function for $C$:



      $$f(c)=begin{array}{cc}
      { &
      begin{array}{cc}
      frac{2 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0 leq 1-lambda \
      -frac{2 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda< c_0<1 \
      end{array}
      \
      end{array}$$



      Here is what the marginal pdf for $C$ looks like for various values of $lambda$:



      PDF of c for various values of lambda






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        First look at the sample space associated with a non-zero joint density:



        Sample space for joint probability



        The $1-lambda$ location on the figure is for $lambda=0.3$ but it is meant to be a general y-intercept of upper boundary for $c$.



        We see that to construct the value of $Pr[Cleq c_0]$ we need to consider two cases: (1) $c_0 <= 1-lambda$ and $c_0 > 1-lambda$.



        case where c0 leq 1 - lambda



        $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 leq c_0leq 1-lambda leq 1]=int _0^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)} dc dx = frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2}$$



        case where c0 gt 1 - lambda



        $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=\ int _0^{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}int _0^{1-lambda (1-x)}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx+int _{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx =\
        frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2}$$



        So



        $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=begin{array}{cc}
        { &
        begin{array}{cc}
        frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0leq 1-lambda <1 \
        frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda <c_0<1 \
        end{array}
        \
        end{array}$$



        Now take the derivative with respect to $c_0$ to obtain the marginal probability density function for $C$:



        $$f(c)=begin{array}{cc}
        { &
        begin{array}{cc}
        frac{2 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0 leq 1-lambda \
        -frac{2 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda< c_0<1 \
        end{array}
        \
        end{array}$$



        Here is what the marginal pdf for $C$ looks like for various values of $lambda$:



        PDF of c for various values of lambda






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        First look at the sample space associated with a non-zero joint density:



        Sample space for joint probability



        The $1-lambda$ location on the figure is for $lambda=0.3$ but it is meant to be a general y-intercept of upper boundary for $c$.



        We see that to construct the value of $Pr[Cleq c_0]$ we need to consider two cases: (1) $c_0 <= 1-lambda$ and $c_0 > 1-lambda$.



        case where c0 leq 1 - lambda



        $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 leq c_0leq 1-lambda leq 1]=int _0^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)} dc dx = frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2}$$



        case where c0 gt 1 - lambda



        $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=\ int _0^{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}int _0^{1-lambda (1-x)}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx+int _{frac{c_0+lambda -1}{lambda }}^1int _0^{c_0}frac{2 x}{1-lambda (1-x)}dcdx =\
        frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2}$$



        So



        $$Pr[Cleq c_0 | 0 lt 1-lambda < c_0 leq 1]=begin{array}{cc}
        { &
        begin{array}{cc}
        frac{2 c_0 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0leq 1-lambda <1 \
        frac{(c_0+lambda -1)^2-2 c_0 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda <c_0<1 \
        end{array}
        \
        end{array}$$



        Now take the derivative with respect to $c_0$ to obtain the marginal probability density function for $C$:



        $$f(c)=begin{array}{cc}
        { &
        begin{array}{cc}
        frac{2 (lambda -(lambda -1) log (1-lambda ))}{lambda ^2} & 0leq c_0 leq 1-lambda \
        -frac{2 ((lambda -1) log (c_0)+c_0-1)}{lambda ^2} & 0<1-lambda< c_0<1 \
        end{array}
        \
        end{array}$$



        Here is what the marginal pdf for $C$ looks like for various values of $lambda$:



        PDF of c for various values of lambda







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 12 at 5:53

























        answered Jan 12 at 5:19









        JimBJimB

        61547




        61547






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069461%2fcomputing-marginal-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna