On the uniform convergence of a fourier series
$begingroup$
Please help me verify if the following claim is true.
Claim:
Let $fleft( x right)$ be $2pi $-Periodic and continuously differentiable on the real line.
Then the Fourier series of $f(x)$ converges to $f(x)$ uniformly on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$.
I've seen the above claim in numerous places and even with weakened conditions (that the function is periodic, continuous but only piecewise smooth). I'm also very familiar with the proof (it makes use of the Fourier series of the derivative, Cauchy Schwarz inequality and the Weierstrass M-test).
Yet my professor insisted throughout the entire semester that the above claim is false.
So either I have missed something or he's wrong (which I doubt since he's one of the smartest people in the math department)
Is the claim true or false?
Thank you in advance!
fourier-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please help me verify if the following claim is true.
Claim:
Let $fleft( x right)$ be $2pi $-Periodic and continuously differentiable on the real line.
Then the Fourier series of $f(x)$ converges to $f(x)$ uniformly on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$.
I've seen the above claim in numerous places and even with weakened conditions (that the function is periodic, continuous but only piecewise smooth). I'm also very familiar with the proof (it makes use of the Fourier series of the derivative, Cauchy Schwarz inequality and the Weierstrass M-test).
Yet my professor insisted throughout the entire semester that the above claim is false.
So either I have missed something or he's wrong (which I doubt since he's one of the smartest people in the math department)
Is the claim true or false?
Thank you in advance!
fourier-series
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It's certainly true. Maybe he was simply wrong, or maybe it was actually some other similar statement that he was saying is false. Ask him for a counterexample...
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 13 at 13:15
$begingroup$
Thanks! I will pursue this matter further but I am relieved to know that it is not something I have missed
$endgroup$
– zokomoko
Jan 13 at 21:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please help me verify if the following claim is true.
Claim:
Let $fleft( x right)$ be $2pi $-Periodic and continuously differentiable on the real line.
Then the Fourier series of $f(x)$ converges to $f(x)$ uniformly on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$.
I've seen the above claim in numerous places and even with weakened conditions (that the function is periodic, continuous but only piecewise smooth). I'm also very familiar with the proof (it makes use of the Fourier series of the derivative, Cauchy Schwarz inequality and the Weierstrass M-test).
Yet my professor insisted throughout the entire semester that the above claim is false.
So either I have missed something or he's wrong (which I doubt since he's one of the smartest people in the math department)
Is the claim true or false?
Thank you in advance!
fourier-series
$endgroup$
Please help me verify if the following claim is true.
Claim:
Let $fleft( x right)$ be $2pi $-Periodic and continuously differentiable on the real line.
Then the Fourier series of $f(x)$ converges to $f(x)$ uniformly on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$.
I've seen the above claim in numerous places and even with weakened conditions (that the function is periodic, continuous but only piecewise smooth). I'm also very familiar with the proof (it makes use of the Fourier series of the derivative, Cauchy Schwarz inequality and the Weierstrass M-test).
Yet my professor insisted throughout the entire semester that the above claim is false.
So either I have missed something or he's wrong (which I doubt since he's one of the smartest people in the math department)
Is the claim true or false?
Thank you in advance!
fourier-series
fourier-series
asked Jan 13 at 10:57
zokomokozokomoko
169214
169214
2
$begingroup$
It's certainly true. Maybe he was simply wrong, or maybe it was actually some other similar statement that he was saying is false. Ask him for a counterexample...
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 13 at 13:15
$begingroup$
Thanks! I will pursue this matter further but I am relieved to know that it is not something I have missed
$endgroup$
– zokomoko
Jan 13 at 21:56
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
It's certainly true. Maybe he was simply wrong, or maybe it was actually some other similar statement that he was saying is false. Ask him for a counterexample...
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 13 at 13:15
$begingroup$
Thanks! I will pursue this matter further but I am relieved to know that it is not something I have missed
$endgroup$
– zokomoko
Jan 13 at 21:56
2
2
$begingroup$
It's certainly true. Maybe he was simply wrong, or maybe it was actually some other similar statement that he was saying is false. Ask him for a counterexample...
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 13 at 13:15
$begingroup$
It's certainly true. Maybe he was simply wrong, or maybe it was actually some other similar statement that he was saying is false. Ask him for a counterexample...
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 13 at 13:15
$begingroup$
Thanks! I will pursue this matter further but I am relieved to know that it is not something I have missed
$endgroup$
– zokomoko
Jan 13 at 21:56
$begingroup$
Thanks! I will pursue this matter further but I am relieved to know that it is not something I have missed
$endgroup$
– zokomoko
Jan 13 at 21:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $f$ is periodic, continuous and of bounded variation on $[0,2pi]$ the the Fourier series of $f$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,2pi]$. In particulr this is true for continuously differentiable periodic functions. So your professor is wrong. It is easy to find references. One reference is https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=2ahUKEwi9ne2j2urfAhWBXysKHfWCAVoQFjADegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcourses.mai.liu.se%2FGU%2FTATA57%2FDokument%2FFourierSeries2.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RY7-Tn-XSApbGIaIcR_uo
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071878%2fon-the-uniform-convergence-of-a-fourier-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $f$ is periodic, continuous and of bounded variation on $[0,2pi]$ the the Fourier series of $f$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,2pi]$. In particulr this is true for continuously differentiable periodic functions. So your professor is wrong. It is easy to find references. One reference is https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=2ahUKEwi9ne2j2urfAhWBXysKHfWCAVoQFjADegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcourses.mai.liu.se%2FGU%2FTATA57%2FDokument%2FFourierSeries2.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RY7-Tn-XSApbGIaIcR_uo
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is periodic, continuous and of bounded variation on $[0,2pi]$ the the Fourier series of $f$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,2pi]$. In particulr this is true for continuously differentiable periodic functions. So your professor is wrong. It is easy to find references. One reference is https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=2ahUKEwi9ne2j2urfAhWBXysKHfWCAVoQFjADegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcourses.mai.liu.se%2FGU%2FTATA57%2FDokument%2FFourierSeries2.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RY7-Tn-XSApbGIaIcR_uo
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is periodic, continuous and of bounded variation on $[0,2pi]$ the the Fourier series of $f$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,2pi]$. In particulr this is true for continuously differentiable periodic functions. So your professor is wrong. It is easy to find references. One reference is https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=2ahUKEwi9ne2j2urfAhWBXysKHfWCAVoQFjADegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcourses.mai.liu.se%2FGU%2FTATA57%2FDokument%2FFourierSeries2.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RY7-Tn-XSApbGIaIcR_uo
$endgroup$
If $f$ is periodic, continuous and of bounded variation on $[0,2pi]$ the the Fourier series of $f$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,2pi]$. In particulr this is true for continuously differentiable periodic functions. So your professor is wrong. It is easy to find references. One reference is https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=2ahUKEwi9ne2j2urfAhWBXysKHfWCAVoQFjADegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcourses.mai.liu.se%2FGU%2FTATA57%2FDokument%2FFourierSeries2.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1RY7-Tn-XSApbGIaIcR_uo
edited Jan 13 at 12:02
answered Jan 13 at 11:53
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
75.3k53270
75.3k53270
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071878%2fon-the-uniform-convergence-of-a-fourier-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
It's certainly true. Maybe he was simply wrong, or maybe it was actually some other similar statement that he was saying is false. Ask him for a counterexample...
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 13 at 13:15
$begingroup$
Thanks! I will pursue this matter further but I am relieved to know that it is not something I have missed
$endgroup$
– zokomoko
Jan 13 at 21:56