Find diagonal matrix $D$ such that $A D$ is Hurwitz












0












$begingroup$


Let $A in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$. Give necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the existence of a matrix $D in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$ such that all eigenvalues of $AD$ have negative real part (i.e., $AD$ Hurwitz). Some initial thoughts ...




  1. Obviously $A, D$ must have full rank.


  2. If $-A$ is so-called $D$-stable, the result seems to follow, although this is a much stronger condition than I need as it ensures that $AD$ is Hurwitz for all positive diagonal matrices $D$ (I think theres an easy extension there to allow for $D$ to have both positive and negative diagonal elements).


  3. An equivalent formulation is that this is true if and only if there exists a $D$ and a matrix $P succ 0$ such that $P(AD)^{sf T} + (AD)P prec 0$. Letting $K = DP$ this is equivalent to the convex inequality $K^{sf T}A + AK prec 0$ in the variable $K$. If this is feasible for some $K^{star}$, you can then probably argue about the factorization $K^{star} = DP$ with $P succ 0$ and recover an appropriate choice of $D$?



Note: This matrix analysis question is motivated by a problem in systems and control theory.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $A in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$. Give necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the existence of a matrix $D in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$ such that all eigenvalues of $AD$ have negative real part (i.e., $AD$ Hurwitz). Some initial thoughts ...




    1. Obviously $A, D$ must have full rank.


    2. If $-A$ is so-called $D$-stable, the result seems to follow, although this is a much stronger condition than I need as it ensures that $AD$ is Hurwitz for all positive diagonal matrices $D$ (I think theres an easy extension there to allow for $D$ to have both positive and negative diagonal elements).


    3. An equivalent formulation is that this is true if and only if there exists a $D$ and a matrix $P succ 0$ such that $P(AD)^{sf T} + (AD)P prec 0$. Letting $K = DP$ this is equivalent to the convex inequality $K^{sf T}A + AK prec 0$ in the variable $K$. If this is feasible for some $K^{star}$, you can then probably argue about the factorization $K^{star} = DP$ with $P succ 0$ and recover an appropriate choice of $D$?



    Note: This matrix analysis question is motivated by a problem in systems and control theory.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $A in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$. Give necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the existence of a matrix $D in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$ such that all eigenvalues of $AD$ have negative real part (i.e., $AD$ Hurwitz). Some initial thoughts ...




      1. Obviously $A, D$ must have full rank.


      2. If $-A$ is so-called $D$-stable, the result seems to follow, although this is a much stronger condition than I need as it ensures that $AD$ is Hurwitz for all positive diagonal matrices $D$ (I think theres an easy extension there to allow for $D$ to have both positive and negative diagonal elements).


      3. An equivalent formulation is that this is true if and only if there exists a $D$ and a matrix $P succ 0$ such that $P(AD)^{sf T} + (AD)P prec 0$. Letting $K = DP$ this is equivalent to the convex inequality $K^{sf T}A + AK prec 0$ in the variable $K$. If this is feasible for some $K^{star}$, you can then probably argue about the factorization $K^{star} = DP$ with $P succ 0$ and recover an appropriate choice of $D$?



      Note: This matrix analysis question is motivated by a problem in systems and control theory.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $A in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$. Give necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the existence of a matrix $D in mathbb{R}^{m times m}$ such that all eigenvalues of $AD$ have negative real part (i.e., $AD$ Hurwitz). Some initial thoughts ...




      1. Obviously $A, D$ must have full rank.


      2. If $-A$ is so-called $D$-stable, the result seems to follow, although this is a much stronger condition than I need as it ensures that $AD$ is Hurwitz for all positive diagonal matrices $D$ (I think theres an easy extension there to allow for $D$ to have both positive and negative diagonal elements).


      3. An equivalent formulation is that this is true if and only if there exists a $D$ and a matrix $P succ 0$ such that $P(AD)^{sf T} + (AD)P prec 0$. Letting $K = DP$ this is equivalent to the convex inequality $K^{sf T}A + AK prec 0$ in the variable $K$. If this is feasible for some $K^{star}$, you can then probably argue about the factorization $K^{star} = DP$ with $P succ 0$ and recover an appropriate choice of $D$?



      Note: This matrix analysis question is motivated by a problem in systems and control theory.







      matrices matrix-equations matrix-decomposition semidefinite-programming lmis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 25 '18 at 16:52









      Rodrigo de Azevedo

      13k41958




      13k41958










      asked Dec 25 '18 at 15:20









      JohnJohn

      1238




      1238






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your problem is equivalent to the state feedback problem for LTI systems, so



          $$
          dot{x} = mathcal{A},x + mathcal{B},u
          $$



          with $u = -K,x$ such that $mathcal{A} - mathcal{B},K$ is Hurwitz. In your case $mathcal{A}=0$ and $mathcal{B} = -A$. When $mathcal{A}=0$ then the pair $(mathcal{A},mathcal{B})$ is stabilizable if and only if $mathcal{B}$ is full rank. The same conditions holds for your problem, so $A$ has to be full rank.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052188%2ffind-diagonal-matrix-d-such-that-a-d-is-hurwitz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Your problem is equivalent to the state feedback problem for LTI systems, so



            $$
            dot{x} = mathcal{A},x + mathcal{B},u
            $$



            with $u = -K,x$ such that $mathcal{A} - mathcal{B},K$ is Hurwitz. In your case $mathcal{A}=0$ and $mathcal{B} = -A$. When $mathcal{A}=0$ then the pair $(mathcal{A},mathcal{B})$ is stabilizable if and only if $mathcal{B}$ is full rank. The same conditions holds for your problem, so $A$ has to be full rank.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Your problem is equivalent to the state feedback problem for LTI systems, so



              $$
              dot{x} = mathcal{A},x + mathcal{B},u
              $$



              with $u = -K,x$ such that $mathcal{A} - mathcal{B},K$ is Hurwitz. In your case $mathcal{A}=0$ and $mathcal{B} = -A$. When $mathcal{A}=0$ then the pair $(mathcal{A},mathcal{B})$ is stabilizable if and only if $mathcal{B}$ is full rank. The same conditions holds for your problem, so $A$ has to be full rank.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Your problem is equivalent to the state feedback problem for LTI systems, so



                $$
                dot{x} = mathcal{A},x + mathcal{B},u
                $$



                with $u = -K,x$ such that $mathcal{A} - mathcal{B},K$ is Hurwitz. In your case $mathcal{A}=0$ and $mathcal{B} = -A$. When $mathcal{A}=0$ then the pair $(mathcal{A},mathcal{B})$ is stabilizable if and only if $mathcal{B}$ is full rank. The same conditions holds for your problem, so $A$ has to be full rank.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your problem is equivalent to the state feedback problem for LTI systems, so



                $$
                dot{x} = mathcal{A},x + mathcal{B},u
                $$



                with $u = -K,x$ such that $mathcal{A} - mathcal{B},K$ is Hurwitz. In your case $mathcal{A}=0$ and $mathcal{B} = -A$. When $mathcal{A}=0$ then the pair $(mathcal{A},mathcal{B})$ is stabilizable if and only if $mathcal{B}$ is full rank. The same conditions holds for your problem, so $A$ has to be full rank.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 29 '18 at 15:15









                Kwin van der VeenKwin van der Veen

                5,4952828




                5,4952828






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052188%2ffind-diagonal-matrix-d-such-that-a-d-is-hurwitz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna