Invertibility of the square root of an operator












3












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).




  • The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
    $$N^2=M.$$


  • In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$




If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).




    • The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
      $$N^2=M.$$


    • In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$




    If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).




      • The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
        $$N^2=M.$$


      • In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$




      If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).




      • The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
        $$N^2=M.$$


      • In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$




      If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?








      functional-analysis operator-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 5 at 14:05









      Bernard

      123k741116




      123k741116










      asked Jan 5 at 14:01









      SchülerSchüler

      1,5491421




      1,5491421






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
          $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Jan 5 at 14:33










          • $begingroup$
            I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 5 at 14:36












          • $begingroup$
            According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Jan 5 at 17:16










          • $begingroup$
            Of course, I agree with you!
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 5 at 17:20










          • $begingroup$
            I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Feb 9 at 16:17



















          4












          $begingroup$

          $N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.



          For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)



          This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062747%2finvertibility-of-the-square-root-of-an-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
            $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 14:33










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 14:36












            • $begingroup$
              According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 17:16










            • $begingroup$
              Of course, I agree with you!
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 17:20










            • $begingroup$
              I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Feb 9 at 16:17
















            3












            $begingroup$

            Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
            $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 14:33










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 14:36












            • $begingroup$
              According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 17:16










            • $begingroup$
              Of course, I agree with you!
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 17:20










            • $begingroup$
              I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Feb 9 at 16:17














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
            $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
            $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 5 at 14:12









            SongSong

            18.3k21449




            18.3k21449












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 14:33










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 14:36












            • $begingroup$
              According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 17:16










            • $begingroup$
              Of course, I agree with you!
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 17:20










            • $begingroup$
              I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Feb 9 at 16:17


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 14:33










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 14:36












            • $begingroup$
              According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Jan 5 at 17:16










            • $begingroup$
              Of course, I agree with you!
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Jan 5 at 17:20










            • $begingroup$
              I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Schüler
              Feb 9 at 16:17
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Jan 5 at 14:33




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Jan 5 at 14:33












            $begingroup$
            I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 5 at 14:36






            $begingroup$
            I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 5 at 14:36














            $begingroup$
            According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Jan 5 at 17:16




            $begingroup$
            According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Jan 5 at 17:16












            $begingroup$
            Of course, I agree with you!
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 5 at 17:20




            $begingroup$
            Of course, I agree with you!
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Jan 5 at 17:20












            $begingroup$
            I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Feb 9 at 16:17




            $begingroup$
            I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – Schüler
            Feb 9 at 16:17











            4












            $begingroup$

            $N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.



            For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)



            This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              $N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.



              For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)



              This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                $N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.



                For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)



                This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                $N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.



                For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)



                This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 5 at 14:06









                Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

                59.5k11446




                59.5k11446






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062747%2finvertibility-of-the-square-root-of-an-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna