Invertibility of the square root of an operator
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).
The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
$$N^2=M.$$In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$
If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?
functional-analysis operator-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).
The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
$$N^2=M.$$In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$
If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?
functional-analysis operator-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).
The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
$$N^2=M.$$In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$
If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?
functional-analysis operator-theory
$endgroup$
Let $mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $F$. Let $Min mathcal{B}(F)^+$ (i.e. $langle Mx;, ;xranglegeq 0$ for all $xin F$).
The square root of $M$ is defined to be the unique operator $N$ such that
$$N^2=M.$$In this case we write $N=M^{1/2}$
If $M$ is an invertible operators, is $M^{1/2}$ invertible?
functional-analysis operator-theory
functional-analysis operator-theory
edited Jan 5 at 14:05
Bernard
123k741116
123k741116
asked Jan 5 at 14:01
SchülerSchüler
1,5491421
1,5491421
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
$$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
$N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.
For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)
This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062747%2finvertibility-of-the-square-root-of-an-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
$$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
$$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
$$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
Note that $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that
$$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ Thus $sigma(M^{1/2})subset [epsilon^{1/2},infty)$ and $M^{1/2}$ is invertible.
answered Jan 5 at 14:12
SongSong
18.3k21449
18.3k21449
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Is your equivalence well known?
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
I think it is. It is in fact easier than it seems. Since $Mge 0$, we know $sigma(M)subset [0,infty)$. But if $M$ is invertible, we must have $epsilon =min sigma(M) >0$. The other direction is true since $0notin sigma(M)$ means $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 14:36
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
According to our answer, the converse is also true. That is if $A^{1/2}$ is invertible, then $A$ is also invertible. Do you agree with me? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Jan 5 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
Of course, I agree with you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 5 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
$begingroup$
I think the equivalence is true only for positive operators. That is it is better to write:'' Let $M$ be a positive operator. Then $M$ is invertible if and only if there is $epsilon>0$ such that $$sigma(M)subset [epsilon, infty).$$ '' Do you agree with me? Thanks
$endgroup$
– Schüler
Feb 9 at 16:17
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
$N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.
For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)
This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.
For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)
This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.
For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)
This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
$N(x)=N(y)$ implies $M(x)=N^2(x)=N^2(y)=M(y)$ since $M$ is injective, we deduce that $N$ is injective.
For every $y$, $y=M(x)=N(N(x))$ implies that $N$ is surjective and open (open mapping theorem)
This implies that the inverse of $N$ is continuous $N$ and $N$ is invertible.
answered Jan 5 at 14:06
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.5k11446
59.5k11446
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062747%2finvertibility-of-the-square-root-of-an-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown