Absolute convergence of Fourier series in $mathbb{Z}_p$












1












$begingroup$


For a $p$-adic number $a in frac{n}{p^k}+mathbb{Z}_psubset mathbb{Q}_p$ let $exp(2i pi a) =exp(2i pi frac{n}{p^k})$ and $psi_a(x) = exp(2i pi ax)$. Then $$Hom(mathbb{Z}_p,mathbb{C}^times) = { psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$$




  • For $f,h$ (uniformly) continuous $ mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$ let $langle f,h rangle =lim_{k to infty} p^{-k} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} f(n) overline{h(n)}$


  • $f ast h(x) = langle f(x-.),overline{h} rangle $


  • We obtain that
    $$lim_{k to infty} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} langle f,psi_{n/p^k}rangle psi_{n/p^k}(x) = lim_{k to infty} f ast sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} psi_{n/p^k}(x)= lim_{k to infty} f ast p^k 1_{x in p^k mathbb{Z}_p} = f(x)$$
    and the convergence is uniform.



  • This is to be interpreted as a particular order of summation for the Fourier series $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x) tag{1}$$




    Question : when does $(1)$ converge absolutely ?




  • If $f$ is locally constant, that is for some $m$, $f(x) = f(x bmod p^m)$ then its Fourier series is a finite sum $sum_{a in p^{-m}mathbb{Z}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x)$ as $langle f, psi_{n/p^k} rangle = 0$ whenever $ k >m$ ($pnmid n$).


  • With $|f|_2^2 = langle f,f rangle$ we have the Hilbert space $L^2(mathbb{Z}_p)$ of which ${ psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$ is an orthonormal basis so $f in C^0(mathbb{Z}_p) implies f in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle|^2 = |f|_2^2$. Unlike the derivative $L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})to L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})$ there is no obvious unbounded operator such that $T(f) = sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}c(a) langle f,psi_arangle psi_a$ and $sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2} < infty$. If that operator could be easily defined we'd have $T(f) in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies $ $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle| le (sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle T(f),psi_arangle|^2)^{1/2}(sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2})^{1/2} = C |T(f)|_2$$ so $(1)$ would converge absolutely.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    For a $p$-adic number $a in frac{n}{p^k}+mathbb{Z}_psubset mathbb{Q}_p$ let $exp(2i pi a) =exp(2i pi frac{n}{p^k})$ and $psi_a(x) = exp(2i pi ax)$. Then $$Hom(mathbb{Z}_p,mathbb{C}^times) = { psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$$




    • For $f,h$ (uniformly) continuous $ mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$ let $langle f,h rangle =lim_{k to infty} p^{-k} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} f(n) overline{h(n)}$


    • $f ast h(x) = langle f(x-.),overline{h} rangle $


    • We obtain that
      $$lim_{k to infty} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} langle f,psi_{n/p^k}rangle psi_{n/p^k}(x) = lim_{k to infty} f ast sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} psi_{n/p^k}(x)= lim_{k to infty} f ast p^k 1_{x in p^k mathbb{Z}_p} = f(x)$$
      and the convergence is uniform.



    • This is to be interpreted as a particular order of summation for the Fourier series $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x) tag{1}$$




      Question : when does $(1)$ converge absolutely ?




    • If $f$ is locally constant, that is for some $m$, $f(x) = f(x bmod p^m)$ then its Fourier series is a finite sum $sum_{a in p^{-m}mathbb{Z}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x)$ as $langle f, psi_{n/p^k} rangle = 0$ whenever $ k >m$ ($pnmid n$).


    • With $|f|_2^2 = langle f,f rangle$ we have the Hilbert space $L^2(mathbb{Z}_p)$ of which ${ psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$ is an orthonormal basis so $f in C^0(mathbb{Z}_p) implies f in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle|^2 = |f|_2^2$. Unlike the derivative $L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})to L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})$ there is no obvious unbounded operator such that $T(f) = sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}c(a) langle f,psi_arangle psi_a$ and $sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2} < infty$. If that operator could be easily defined we'd have $T(f) in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies $ $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle| le (sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle T(f),psi_arangle|^2)^{1/2}(sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2})^{1/2} = C |T(f)|_2$$ so $(1)$ would converge absolutely.











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      For a $p$-adic number $a in frac{n}{p^k}+mathbb{Z}_psubset mathbb{Q}_p$ let $exp(2i pi a) =exp(2i pi frac{n}{p^k})$ and $psi_a(x) = exp(2i pi ax)$. Then $$Hom(mathbb{Z}_p,mathbb{C}^times) = { psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$$




      • For $f,h$ (uniformly) continuous $ mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$ let $langle f,h rangle =lim_{k to infty} p^{-k} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} f(n) overline{h(n)}$


      • $f ast h(x) = langle f(x-.),overline{h} rangle $


      • We obtain that
        $$lim_{k to infty} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} langle f,psi_{n/p^k}rangle psi_{n/p^k}(x) = lim_{k to infty} f ast sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} psi_{n/p^k}(x)= lim_{k to infty} f ast p^k 1_{x in p^k mathbb{Z}_p} = f(x)$$
        and the convergence is uniform.



      • This is to be interpreted as a particular order of summation for the Fourier series $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x) tag{1}$$




        Question : when does $(1)$ converge absolutely ?




      • If $f$ is locally constant, that is for some $m$, $f(x) = f(x bmod p^m)$ then its Fourier series is a finite sum $sum_{a in p^{-m}mathbb{Z}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x)$ as $langle f, psi_{n/p^k} rangle = 0$ whenever $ k >m$ ($pnmid n$).


      • With $|f|_2^2 = langle f,f rangle$ we have the Hilbert space $L^2(mathbb{Z}_p)$ of which ${ psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$ is an orthonormal basis so $f in C^0(mathbb{Z}_p) implies f in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle|^2 = |f|_2^2$. Unlike the derivative $L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})to L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})$ there is no obvious unbounded operator such that $T(f) = sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}c(a) langle f,psi_arangle psi_a$ and $sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2} < infty$. If that operator could be easily defined we'd have $T(f) in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies $ $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle| le (sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle T(f),psi_arangle|^2)^{1/2}(sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2})^{1/2} = C |T(f)|_2$$ so $(1)$ would converge absolutely.











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For a $p$-adic number $a in frac{n}{p^k}+mathbb{Z}_psubset mathbb{Q}_p$ let $exp(2i pi a) =exp(2i pi frac{n}{p^k})$ and $psi_a(x) = exp(2i pi ax)$. Then $$Hom(mathbb{Z}_p,mathbb{C}^times) = { psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$$




      • For $f,h$ (uniformly) continuous $ mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$ let $langle f,h rangle =lim_{k to infty} p^{-k} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} f(n) overline{h(n)}$


      • $f ast h(x) = langle f(x-.),overline{h} rangle $


      • We obtain that
        $$lim_{k to infty} sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} langle f,psi_{n/p^k}rangle psi_{n/p^k}(x) = lim_{k to infty} f ast sum_{n=0}^{p^k -1} psi_{n/p^k}(x)= lim_{k to infty} f ast p^k 1_{x in p^k mathbb{Z}_p} = f(x)$$
        and the convergence is uniform.



      • This is to be interpreted as a particular order of summation for the Fourier series $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x) tag{1}$$




        Question : when does $(1)$ converge absolutely ?




      • If $f$ is locally constant, that is for some $m$, $f(x) = f(x bmod p^m)$ then its Fourier series is a finite sum $sum_{a in p^{-m}mathbb{Z}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}langle f,psi_arangle psi_a(x)$ as $langle f, psi_{n/p^k} rangle = 0$ whenever $ k >m$ ($pnmid n$).


      • With $|f|_2^2 = langle f,f rangle$ we have the Hilbert space $L^2(mathbb{Z}_p)$ of which ${ psi_a , a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}$ is an orthonormal basis so $f in C^0(mathbb{Z}_p) implies f in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle|^2 = |f|_2^2$. Unlike the derivative $L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})to L^2(mathbb{R}/mathbb{Z})$ there is no obvious unbounded operator such that $T(f) = sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}c(a) langle f,psi_arangle psi_a$ and $sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2} < infty$. If that operator could be easily defined we'd have $T(f) in L^2(mathbb{Z}_p) implies $ $$sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle f,psi_arangle| le (sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}|langle T(f),psi_arangle|^2)^{1/2}(sum_{a in mathbb{Q}_p/mathbb{Z}_p}frac{1}{|c(a)|^2})^{1/2} = C |T(f)|_2$$ so $(1)$ would converge absolutely.








      fourier-series harmonic-analysis p-adic-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 10 at 4:08







      reuns

















      asked Jan 10 at 2:05









      reunsreuns

      20.5k21352




      20.5k21352






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $defZZ{mathbb{Z}}defQQ{mathbb{Q}}$The Fourier series need not converge absolutely. First, some notation. Let $A_n = p^n ZZ_p subseteq ZZ_p$ and let $B_n = p^{-n} ZZ_p/ZZ_p subset QQ_p/ZZ_p$. Let $chi_S$ denote the characteristic function of a set $S$, meaning that $chi_S(s)=1$ if $s in S$ and $chi_S(s)=0$ otherwise. Then the Fourier transform of $chi_{A_n}$ is $p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$.



          Let $r_n$ be any sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$ is conditionally convergent. Then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is a continuous function on $ZZ_p$. (Because, if $s in A_m setminus A_{m+1}$, then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}(s)=sum_{n=0}^m r_n$. If $s to 0$ then $m to infty$, so this approaches $lim_{m to infty} sum_{n=0}^m r_n$, which is the definition of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$.)



          The Fourier transform of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$. If $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, then this is $sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{-n}$ (which is absolutely convergent, since $r_n to 0$). If we sum over all points $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, we get
          $$c_m:=(1-1/p) sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{m-n}.$$
          If the Fourier series were absolutely convergent, then in particular we could clump together the $t$'s in the same $B_m setminus B_{m-1}$ and then order the $m$'s arbitrarily. In other words, $sum c_m$ would be aboslutely convergent.



          But it is easy to come up with $r_n$ such that $sum c_m$ is not absolutely convergent. For example, the standard $tfrac{(-1)^n}{n}$ works.



          Of course, what you wanted was a condition under which the sum would be absolutely convergent, but you seemed unclear as to whether this would always happen, so it seemed worth pointing out that the answer is "no". I suspect there should be some sort of condition in terms of the modulus of continuity of the function; I'll think about it a bit.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 5:45












          • $begingroup$
            In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 19:04














          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068153%2fabsolute-convergence-of-fourier-series-in-mathbbz-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          $defZZ{mathbb{Z}}defQQ{mathbb{Q}}$The Fourier series need not converge absolutely. First, some notation. Let $A_n = p^n ZZ_p subseteq ZZ_p$ and let $B_n = p^{-n} ZZ_p/ZZ_p subset QQ_p/ZZ_p$. Let $chi_S$ denote the characteristic function of a set $S$, meaning that $chi_S(s)=1$ if $s in S$ and $chi_S(s)=0$ otherwise. Then the Fourier transform of $chi_{A_n}$ is $p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$.



          Let $r_n$ be any sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$ is conditionally convergent. Then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is a continuous function on $ZZ_p$. (Because, if $s in A_m setminus A_{m+1}$, then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}(s)=sum_{n=0}^m r_n$. If $s to 0$ then $m to infty$, so this approaches $lim_{m to infty} sum_{n=0}^m r_n$, which is the definition of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$.)



          The Fourier transform of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$. If $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, then this is $sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{-n}$ (which is absolutely convergent, since $r_n to 0$). If we sum over all points $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, we get
          $$c_m:=(1-1/p) sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{m-n}.$$
          If the Fourier series were absolutely convergent, then in particular we could clump together the $t$'s in the same $B_m setminus B_{m-1}$ and then order the $m$'s arbitrarily. In other words, $sum c_m$ would be aboslutely convergent.



          But it is easy to come up with $r_n$ such that $sum c_m$ is not absolutely convergent. For example, the standard $tfrac{(-1)^n}{n}$ works.



          Of course, what you wanted was a condition under which the sum would be absolutely convergent, but you seemed unclear as to whether this would always happen, so it seemed worth pointing out that the answer is "no". I suspect there should be some sort of condition in terms of the modulus of continuity of the function; I'll think about it a bit.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 5:45












          • $begingroup$
            In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 19:04


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $defZZ{mathbb{Z}}defQQ{mathbb{Q}}$The Fourier series need not converge absolutely. First, some notation. Let $A_n = p^n ZZ_p subseteq ZZ_p$ and let $B_n = p^{-n} ZZ_p/ZZ_p subset QQ_p/ZZ_p$. Let $chi_S$ denote the characteristic function of a set $S$, meaning that $chi_S(s)=1$ if $s in S$ and $chi_S(s)=0$ otherwise. Then the Fourier transform of $chi_{A_n}$ is $p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$.



          Let $r_n$ be any sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$ is conditionally convergent. Then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is a continuous function on $ZZ_p$. (Because, if $s in A_m setminus A_{m+1}$, then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}(s)=sum_{n=0}^m r_n$. If $s to 0$ then $m to infty$, so this approaches $lim_{m to infty} sum_{n=0}^m r_n$, which is the definition of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$.)



          The Fourier transform of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$. If $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, then this is $sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{-n}$ (which is absolutely convergent, since $r_n to 0$). If we sum over all points $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, we get
          $$c_m:=(1-1/p) sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{m-n}.$$
          If the Fourier series were absolutely convergent, then in particular we could clump together the $t$'s in the same $B_m setminus B_{m-1}$ and then order the $m$'s arbitrarily. In other words, $sum c_m$ would be aboslutely convergent.



          But it is easy to come up with $r_n$ such that $sum c_m$ is not absolutely convergent. For example, the standard $tfrac{(-1)^n}{n}$ works.



          Of course, what you wanted was a condition under which the sum would be absolutely convergent, but you seemed unclear as to whether this would always happen, so it seemed worth pointing out that the answer is "no". I suspect there should be some sort of condition in terms of the modulus of continuity of the function; I'll think about it a bit.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 5:45












          • $begingroup$
            In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 19:04
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          $defZZ{mathbb{Z}}defQQ{mathbb{Q}}$The Fourier series need not converge absolutely. First, some notation. Let $A_n = p^n ZZ_p subseteq ZZ_p$ and let $B_n = p^{-n} ZZ_p/ZZ_p subset QQ_p/ZZ_p$. Let $chi_S$ denote the characteristic function of a set $S$, meaning that $chi_S(s)=1$ if $s in S$ and $chi_S(s)=0$ otherwise. Then the Fourier transform of $chi_{A_n}$ is $p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$.



          Let $r_n$ be any sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$ is conditionally convergent. Then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is a continuous function on $ZZ_p$. (Because, if $s in A_m setminus A_{m+1}$, then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}(s)=sum_{n=0}^m r_n$. If $s to 0$ then $m to infty$, so this approaches $lim_{m to infty} sum_{n=0}^m r_n$, which is the definition of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$.)



          The Fourier transform of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$. If $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, then this is $sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{-n}$ (which is absolutely convergent, since $r_n to 0$). If we sum over all points $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, we get
          $$c_m:=(1-1/p) sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{m-n}.$$
          If the Fourier series were absolutely convergent, then in particular we could clump together the $t$'s in the same $B_m setminus B_{m-1}$ and then order the $m$'s arbitrarily. In other words, $sum c_m$ would be aboslutely convergent.



          But it is easy to come up with $r_n$ such that $sum c_m$ is not absolutely convergent. For example, the standard $tfrac{(-1)^n}{n}$ works.



          Of course, what you wanted was a condition under which the sum would be absolutely convergent, but you seemed unclear as to whether this would always happen, so it seemed worth pointing out that the answer is "no". I suspect there should be some sort of condition in terms of the modulus of continuity of the function; I'll think about it a bit.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          $defZZ{mathbb{Z}}defQQ{mathbb{Q}}$The Fourier series need not converge absolutely. First, some notation. Let $A_n = p^n ZZ_p subseteq ZZ_p$ and let $B_n = p^{-n} ZZ_p/ZZ_p subset QQ_p/ZZ_p$. Let $chi_S$ denote the characteristic function of a set $S$, meaning that $chi_S(s)=1$ if $s in S$ and $chi_S(s)=0$ otherwise. Then the Fourier transform of $chi_{A_n}$ is $p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$.



          Let $r_n$ be any sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$ is conditionally convergent. Then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is a continuous function on $ZZ_p$. (Because, if $s in A_m setminus A_{m+1}$, then $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}(s)=sum_{n=0}^m r_n$. If $s to 0$ then $m to infty$, so this approaches $lim_{m to infty} sum_{n=0}^m r_n$, which is the definition of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n$.)



          The Fourier transform of $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n chi_{A_n}$ is $sum_{n=0}^{infty} r_n p^{-n} chi_{B_n}$. If $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, then this is $sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{-n}$ (which is absolutely convergent, since $r_n to 0$). If we sum over all points $t in B_m setminus B_{m-1}$, we get
          $$c_m:=(1-1/p) sum_{n=m}^{infty} r_n p^{m-n}.$$
          If the Fourier series were absolutely convergent, then in particular we could clump together the $t$'s in the same $B_m setminus B_{m-1}$ and then order the $m$'s arbitrarily. In other words, $sum c_m$ would be aboslutely convergent.



          But it is easy to come up with $r_n$ such that $sum c_m$ is not absolutely convergent. For example, the standard $tfrac{(-1)^n}{n}$ works.



          Of course, what you wanted was a condition under which the sum would be absolutely convergent, but you seemed unclear as to whether this would always happen, so it seemed worth pointing out that the answer is "no". I suspect there should be some sort of condition in terms of the modulus of continuity of the function; I'll think about it a bit.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 10 at 3:34









          David E SpeyerDavid E Speyer

          46.2k4127211




          46.2k4127211












          • $begingroup$
            Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 5:45












          • $begingroup$
            In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 19:04




















          • $begingroup$
            Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 5:45












          • $begingroup$
            In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
            $endgroup$
            – reuns
            Jan 10 at 19:04


















          $begingroup$
          Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
          $endgroup$
          – reuns
          Jan 10 at 5:45






          $begingroup$
          Tks a lot. So starting with $f(s) = sum_{nge 0} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p} r(a,p^n) chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)$ and $chi_{a+p^nmathbb{Z}_p}(s)= sum_{b in B_n} p^{-n}psi_b(-a)psi_b(s)$ and $|r(a,p^n)| le r_n$ then $sum_{n ge 0} r_n p^{n} < infty$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series $f(s) = sum_{m ge 0}sum_{b in B_m- B_{m-1} } psi_b(s) ( sum_{nge m}p^{-n} sum_{a in mathbb{Z}_p/p^n mathbb{Z}_p } r(a,p^n)psi_b(-a))$.
          $endgroup$
          – reuns
          Jan 10 at 5:45














          $begingroup$
          In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
          $endgroup$
          – reuns
          Jan 10 at 19:04






          $begingroup$
          In particular $f : mathbb{Z}_p to mathbb{C}$, $|f(s)-f(s_2)| le C| s-s_2|_p^{1+epsilon}$ implies the absolute convergence of the Fourier series. This seems like an acceptable starting point to manipulate Fourier series on $widehat{mathbb{Z}}$ and $mathbb{A}/mathbb{Q}$ (appearing in the Whittaker expansion of automorphic forms)
          $endgroup$
          – reuns
          Jan 10 at 19:04




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068153%2fabsolute-convergence-of-fourier-series-in-mathbbz-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna