Integrate $displaystyleintfrac{1}{u^2 - 1},du$ without partial fractions?
$begingroup$
Is there any way possible that I might integrate
$$ intfrac{1}{u^2-1},du $$ without appealing to partial fraction decomposition?
I am trying to work some interesting $u$-substitution integrals with novice students who do not need to be taught partial fraction decomposition.
Thank you.
calculus integration
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Is there any way possible that I might integrate
$$ intfrac{1}{u^2-1},du $$ without appealing to partial fraction decomposition?
I am trying to work some interesting $u$-substitution integrals with novice students who do not need to be taught partial fraction decomposition.
Thank you.
calculus integration
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Why don't they need to be taught PFD?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Li
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
consider trigonometry!
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Hint: et $u = sec t$.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
IMO, substitution is harder than partial fraction decomposition, which is just a matter of algebra, not calculus.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
1
$begingroup$
$u=cosh x$ probably works just as well as $sec x$, though I suppose hyperbolic functions may not be taught yet
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:25
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Is there any way possible that I might integrate
$$ intfrac{1}{u^2-1},du $$ without appealing to partial fraction decomposition?
I am trying to work some interesting $u$-substitution integrals with novice students who do not need to be taught partial fraction decomposition.
Thank you.
calculus integration
$endgroup$
Is there any way possible that I might integrate
$$ intfrac{1}{u^2-1},du $$ without appealing to partial fraction decomposition?
I am trying to work some interesting $u$-substitution integrals with novice students who do not need to be taught partial fraction decomposition.
Thank you.
calculus integration
calculus integration
asked Apr 14 '18 at 16:06
clocktowerclocktower
524418
524418
5
$begingroup$
Why don't they need to be taught PFD?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Li
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
consider trigonometry!
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Hint: et $u = sec t$.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
IMO, substitution is harder than partial fraction decomposition, which is just a matter of algebra, not calculus.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
1
$begingroup$
$u=cosh x$ probably works just as well as $sec x$, though I suppose hyperbolic functions may not be taught yet
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:25
|
show 3 more comments
5
$begingroup$
Why don't they need to be taught PFD?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Li
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
consider trigonometry!
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Hint: et $u = sec t$.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
IMO, substitution is harder than partial fraction decomposition, which is just a matter of algebra, not calculus.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
1
$begingroup$
$u=cosh x$ probably works just as well as $sec x$, though I suppose hyperbolic functions may not be taught yet
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:25
5
5
$begingroup$
Why don't they need to be taught PFD?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Li
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
$begingroup$
Why don't they need to be taught PFD?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Li
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
1
$begingroup$
consider trigonometry!
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
$begingroup$
consider trigonometry!
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
2
2
$begingroup$
Hint: et $u = sec t$.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
$begingroup$
Hint: et $u = sec t$.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
1
$begingroup$
IMO, substitution is harder than partial fraction decomposition, which is just a matter of algebra, not calculus.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
$begingroup$
IMO, substitution is harder than partial fraction decomposition, which is just a matter of algebra, not calculus.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
1
1
$begingroup$
$u=cosh x$ probably works just as well as $sec x$, though I suppose hyperbolic functions may not be taught yet
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:25
$begingroup$
$u=cosh x$ probably works just as well as $sec x$, though I suppose hyperbolic functions may not be taught yet
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:25
|
show 3 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is motivated by the solution, so it works quite nicely. It is an alternative to the $sec$ substitution that has been suggested.$$u=frac{1-x}{1+x}$$ $$frac1{u^2-1}=-frac{4x}{(1+x)^2},,,,,,,,,,,,,du=-frac2{(1+x)^2},dx\$$ so the integral becomes $$intfrac1{2x},dx=frac12ln x$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The moment you see $$u^2-1$$
you should think of some trigonometric stuff.
So if you remember,
$$tan^2x=sec^2x-1$$
thus $$u=sec x$$ surely is a candidate (and there are a lot of other variations to play around with!).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
1
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use trigonometric substitution as the integrand contains $u^2-a^2$ where $a=1$. Substitute $u = asec theta$, or just $u = sec theta$.
$$u = sec thetaquad mathrm du = secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
Which can be integrated by remembering the identity $tan^2 theta + 1 = sec^2 theta$:
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta = int {sec theta over tantheta}mathrm dtheta = int csc theta ,mathrm dtheta$$
And you can find the antiderivative of $csc theta$ via identities, see this. Of course, this would be much easier via partial fraction decomposition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have
$$
frac{1}{1-u^2}=frac{1}{(1+u)(1-u)}=frac{1}{(1+u)(2-(1+u))}=frac{1}{(1+u)^2bigl(frac{2}{1+u}-1bigr)}.
$$
Thus,
$$
intfrac{1}{1-u^2},du=-frac{1}{2}lnbiggl|frac{2}{1+u}-1biggr|+C.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answers provided already show many different ways this integral can be approached without Partial Fractions. Here is one more. Similar to the trigonometric substitution $u = sec(x)$ we can employ the hyperbolic substitution $u = tanh(x)$
begin{align}
int frac{1}{u^2 - 1}:du &= int frac{1}{tanh^2(x) - 1}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= int frac{1}{operatorname{sech}^2(x)}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= -x + C = -operatorname{arctanh(u)} + C
end{align}
Where $C$ is the constant of integration.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2736929%2fintegrate-displaystyle-int-frac1u2-1-du-without-partial-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is motivated by the solution, so it works quite nicely. It is an alternative to the $sec$ substitution that has been suggested.$$u=frac{1-x}{1+x}$$ $$frac1{u^2-1}=-frac{4x}{(1+x)^2},,,,,,,,,,,,,du=-frac2{(1+x)^2},dx\$$ so the integral becomes $$intfrac1{2x},dx=frac12ln x$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is motivated by the solution, so it works quite nicely. It is an alternative to the $sec$ substitution that has been suggested.$$u=frac{1-x}{1+x}$$ $$frac1{u^2-1}=-frac{4x}{(1+x)^2},,,,,,,,,,,,,du=-frac2{(1+x)^2},dx\$$ so the integral becomes $$intfrac1{2x},dx=frac12ln x$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is motivated by the solution, so it works quite nicely. It is an alternative to the $sec$ substitution that has been suggested.$$u=frac{1-x}{1+x}$$ $$frac1{u^2-1}=-frac{4x}{(1+x)^2},,,,,,,,,,,,,du=-frac2{(1+x)^2},dx\$$ so the integral becomes $$intfrac1{2x},dx=frac12ln x$$
$endgroup$
This is motivated by the solution, so it works quite nicely. It is an alternative to the $sec$ substitution that has been suggested.$$u=frac{1-x}{1+x}$$ $$frac1{u^2-1}=-frac{4x}{(1+x)^2},,,,,,,,,,,,,du=-frac2{(1+x)^2},dx\$$ so the integral becomes $$intfrac1{2x},dx=frac12ln x$$
answered Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
John DoeJohn Doe
11.9k11339
11.9k11339
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The moment you see $$u^2-1$$
you should think of some trigonometric stuff.
So if you remember,
$$tan^2x=sec^2x-1$$
thus $$u=sec x$$ surely is a candidate (and there are a lot of other variations to play around with!).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
1
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The moment you see $$u^2-1$$
you should think of some trigonometric stuff.
So if you remember,
$$tan^2x=sec^2x-1$$
thus $$u=sec x$$ surely is a candidate (and there are a lot of other variations to play around with!).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
1
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The moment you see $$u^2-1$$
you should think of some trigonometric stuff.
So if you remember,
$$tan^2x=sec^2x-1$$
thus $$u=sec x$$ surely is a candidate (and there are a lot of other variations to play around with!).
$endgroup$
The moment you see $$u^2-1$$
you should think of some trigonometric stuff.
So if you remember,
$$tan^2x=sec^2x-1$$
thus $$u=sec x$$ surely is a candidate (and there are a lot of other variations to play around with!).
answered Apr 14 '18 at 16:09
Karn WatcharasupatKarn Watcharasupat
3,9642526
3,9642526
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
1
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
1
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
$begingroup$
How would you go about integrating $csc x$? This is what this would lead to. If I was given that, I'd probably end up coming back to this and using partial fractions..
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:10
1
1
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
@JohnDoe It's just $$-ln(csc x + cot x)+C$$ You can always teach your student how this was derived since it's pretty manageable.
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use trigonometric substitution as the integrand contains $u^2-a^2$ where $a=1$. Substitute $u = asec theta$, or just $u = sec theta$.
$$u = sec thetaquad mathrm du = secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
Which can be integrated by remembering the identity $tan^2 theta + 1 = sec^2 theta$:
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta = int {sec theta over tantheta}mathrm dtheta = int csc theta ,mathrm dtheta$$
And you can find the antiderivative of $csc theta$ via identities, see this. Of course, this would be much easier via partial fraction decomposition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use trigonometric substitution as the integrand contains $u^2-a^2$ where $a=1$. Substitute $u = asec theta$, or just $u = sec theta$.
$$u = sec thetaquad mathrm du = secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
Which can be integrated by remembering the identity $tan^2 theta + 1 = sec^2 theta$:
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta = int {sec theta over tantheta}mathrm dtheta = int csc theta ,mathrm dtheta$$
And you can find the antiderivative of $csc theta$ via identities, see this. Of course, this would be much easier via partial fraction decomposition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use trigonometric substitution as the integrand contains $u^2-a^2$ where $a=1$. Substitute $u = asec theta$, or just $u = sec theta$.
$$u = sec thetaquad mathrm du = secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
Which can be integrated by remembering the identity $tan^2 theta + 1 = sec^2 theta$:
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta = int {sec theta over tantheta}mathrm dtheta = int csc theta ,mathrm dtheta$$
And you can find the antiderivative of $csc theta$ via identities, see this. Of course, this would be much easier via partial fraction decomposition.
$endgroup$
Use trigonometric substitution as the integrand contains $u^2-a^2$ where $a=1$. Substitute $u = asec theta$, or just $u = sec theta$.
$$u = sec thetaquad mathrm du = secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta$$
Which can be integrated by remembering the identity $tan^2 theta + 1 = sec^2 theta$:
$$int {1over sec^2 theta - 1} secthetatantheta,mathrm dtheta = int {sec theta over tantheta}mathrm dtheta = int csc theta ,mathrm dtheta$$
And you can find the antiderivative of $csc theta$ via identities, see this. Of course, this would be much easier via partial fraction decomposition.
edited Apr 14 '18 at 16:15
answered Apr 14 '18 at 16:09
Andrew LiAndrew Li
4,1621927
4,1621927
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have
$$
frac{1}{1-u^2}=frac{1}{(1+u)(1-u)}=frac{1}{(1+u)(2-(1+u))}=frac{1}{(1+u)^2bigl(frac{2}{1+u}-1bigr)}.
$$
Thus,
$$
intfrac{1}{1-u^2},du=-frac{1}{2}lnbiggl|frac{2}{1+u}-1biggr|+C.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have
$$
frac{1}{1-u^2}=frac{1}{(1+u)(1-u)}=frac{1}{(1+u)(2-(1+u))}=frac{1}{(1+u)^2bigl(frac{2}{1+u}-1bigr)}.
$$
Thus,
$$
intfrac{1}{1-u^2},du=-frac{1}{2}lnbiggl|frac{2}{1+u}-1biggr|+C.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have
$$
frac{1}{1-u^2}=frac{1}{(1+u)(1-u)}=frac{1}{(1+u)(2-(1+u))}=frac{1}{(1+u)^2bigl(frac{2}{1+u}-1bigr)}.
$$
Thus,
$$
intfrac{1}{1-u^2},du=-frac{1}{2}lnbiggl|frac{2}{1+u}-1biggr|+C.
$$
$endgroup$
We have
$$
frac{1}{1-u^2}=frac{1}{(1+u)(1-u)}=frac{1}{(1+u)(2-(1+u))}=frac{1}{(1+u)^2bigl(frac{2}{1+u}-1bigr)}.
$$
Thus,
$$
intfrac{1}{1-u^2},du=-frac{1}{2}lnbiggl|frac{2}{1+u}-1biggr|+C.
$$
answered Apr 14 '18 at 17:59
mickepmickep
18.7k12351
18.7k12351
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answers provided already show many different ways this integral can be approached without Partial Fractions. Here is one more. Similar to the trigonometric substitution $u = sec(x)$ we can employ the hyperbolic substitution $u = tanh(x)$
begin{align}
int frac{1}{u^2 - 1}:du &= int frac{1}{tanh^2(x) - 1}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= int frac{1}{operatorname{sech}^2(x)}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= -x + C = -operatorname{arctanh(u)} + C
end{align}
Where $C$ is the constant of integration.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answers provided already show many different ways this integral can be approached without Partial Fractions. Here is one more. Similar to the trigonometric substitution $u = sec(x)$ we can employ the hyperbolic substitution $u = tanh(x)$
begin{align}
int frac{1}{u^2 - 1}:du &= int frac{1}{tanh^2(x) - 1}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= int frac{1}{operatorname{sech}^2(x)}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= -x + C = -operatorname{arctanh(u)} + C
end{align}
Where $C$ is the constant of integration.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answers provided already show many different ways this integral can be approached without Partial Fractions. Here is one more. Similar to the trigonometric substitution $u = sec(x)$ we can employ the hyperbolic substitution $u = tanh(x)$
begin{align}
int frac{1}{u^2 - 1}:du &= int frac{1}{tanh^2(x) - 1}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= int frac{1}{operatorname{sech}^2(x)}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= -x + C = -operatorname{arctanh(u)} + C
end{align}
Where $C$ is the constant of integration.
$endgroup$
The answers provided already show many different ways this integral can be approached without Partial Fractions. Here is one more. Similar to the trigonometric substitution $u = sec(x)$ we can employ the hyperbolic substitution $u = tanh(x)$
begin{align}
int frac{1}{u^2 - 1}:du &= int frac{1}{tanh^2(x) - 1}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= int frac{1}{operatorname{sech}^2(x)}cdot -operatorname{sech}^2(x):dx \
&= -x + C = -operatorname{arctanh(u)} + C
end{align}
Where $C$ is the constant of integration.
edited Jan 11 at 5:20
answered Jan 10 at 1:41
user150203
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2736929%2fintegrate-displaystyle-int-frac1u2-1-du-without-partial-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
$begingroup$
Why don't they need to be taught PFD?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Li
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
consider trigonometry!
$endgroup$
– Karn Watcharasupat
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Hint: et $u = sec t$.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Apr 14 '18 at 16:07
1
$begingroup$
IMO, substitution is harder than partial fraction decomposition, which is just a matter of algebra, not calculus.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Apr 14 '18 at 16:20
1
$begingroup$
$u=cosh x$ probably works just as well as $sec x$, though I suppose hyperbolic functions may not be taught yet
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Apr 14 '18 at 16:25