Prove that a function is smooth if it is smooth in almost all directions












7












$begingroup$


Question



So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?



I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.



What I've tried already



Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?



When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).



Any help is appreciated.



EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$


    Question



    So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?



    I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.



    What I've tried already



    Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?



    When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).



    Any help is appreciated.



    EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      3



      $begingroup$


      Question



      So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?



      I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.



      What I've tried already



      Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?



      When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).



      Any help is appreciated.



      EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Question



      So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?



      I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.



      What I've tried already



      Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?



      When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).



      Any help is appreciated.



      EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.







      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 14:15







      Sjorszini

















      asked Jan 13 at 10:28









      SjorsziniSjorszini

      805514




      805514






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071867%2fprove-that-a-function-is-smooth-if-it-is-smooth-in-almost-all-directions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071867%2fprove-that-a-function-is-smooth-if-it-is-smooth-in-almost-all-directions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Måne

          Storängen

          VLT Carioca