Prove that a function is smooth if it is smooth in almost all directions
$begingroup$
Question
So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?
I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.
What I've tried already
Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?
When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question
So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?
I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.
What I've tried already
Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?
When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question
So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?
I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.
What I've tried already
Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?
When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
Question
So suppose we have a function $f:mathbb R^2to mathbb R$ for which it is given that $xmapsto f(x,g(x))$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$) for all smooth functions $g:mathbb Rtomathbb R$. Can we prove that $f$ is smooth as well?
I don't know whether this statement is true and honestly I wouldn't be surprised either way.
What I've tried already
Fix a point $(x_0,y_0)$. Intuitively, by taking $g(x) = lambda x$ with $lambdainmathbb R$ we see that $f$ should be at least differentiable along all directions $(1,lambda)$ at $(x_0,y_0)$. This follows for instance by considering the curve $tmapsto (x_0+t, y_0+lambda t)$. Thus the only direction that is non-trivial is the vertical direction $(0,1)$. If we can show that $f$ is also differentiable in that direction then I'm confident that it will be possible to show that $f$ is differentiable. But how can we show whether $f$ is differentiable along $(0,1)$? We cannot do it directly from the fact that $f(x,g(x))$ is smooth, but perhaps we can use a limiting argument, letting the slope of the curve $(t,g(t))$ tend to infinity?
When we know that $f$ is differentiable, it will probably be possible using an inductive argument to prove that $f$ is smooth (i.e., $C^infty$).
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT. If found a closely related result, namely Boman's theorem, which says basically says that $f$ is smooth if and only if $fcircgamma$ is smooth for all smooth curves $gamma:mathbb Rtomathbb R^2$. I feel like the statement of my question should probably be reducible to this theorem. The only difficulty is that we don't necessarily know if our $f$ is differentiable along vertical curves, but perhaps this follows in some way.
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Jan 13 at 14:15
Sjorszini
asked Jan 13 at 10:28
SjorsziniSjorszini
805514
805514
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071867%2fprove-that-a-function-is-smooth-if-it-is-smooth-in-almost-all-directions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071867%2fprove-that-a-function-is-smooth-if-it-is-smooth-in-almost-all-directions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown