Homomorphisms and automorphisms on polynomial rings
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove a series of propositions:
Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.
Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory linear-transformations ring-homomorphism polynomial-rings
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove a series of propositions:
Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.
Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory linear-transformations ring-homomorphism polynomial-rings
New contributor
As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago
And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove a series of propositions:
Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.
Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory linear-transformations ring-homomorphism polynomial-rings
New contributor
I am trying to prove a series of propositions:
Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.
Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory linear-transformations ring-homomorphism polynomial-rings
abstract-algebra ring-theory linear-transformations ring-homomorphism polynomial-rings
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
Servaes
21.1k33792
21.1k33792
New contributor
asked 20 hours ago
nlin08
91
91
New contributor
New contributor
As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago
And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago
add a comment |
As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago
And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago
As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago
As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago
And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago
And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.
An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
$$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
$$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.
An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
$$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
$$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.
An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
$$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
$$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.
An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
$$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
$$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.
For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.
An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
$$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
$$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
Servaes
21.1k33792
21.1k33792
add a comment |
add a comment |
nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019922%2fhomomorphisms-and-automorphisms-on-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago
And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago