Homomorphisms and automorphisms on polynomial rings











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to prove a series of propositions:



Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.



Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
    – Servaes
    16 hours ago










  • And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
    – reuns
    8 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to prove a series of propositions:



Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.



Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
    – Servaes
    16 hours ago










  • And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
    – reuns
    8 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I am trying to prove a series of propositions:



Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.



Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am trying to prove a series of propositions:



Given any homomorphism p from $mathbb{R}$[X] to $mathbb{R}$[X], show that it is equal to $phi_g$ for a unique g in $mathbb{R}$[X], with $phi_g$(f) = f(g(X)). I've expanded the expression $p(f) = p(sum_{i=0}^n a_iX^i) =sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i$ but I'm not sure how to show $p(f) = sum_{i=0}^n p(a_i)p(X)^i = sum_{i=0}^n a_ig(X)^i = phi_g(f)$.



Show that if h,g $in mathbb{R}$[X] are such that h(g(X)) = X, then g(X) = aX+b for a $in$ R$^x$ and b$in mathbb{R}$.







abstract-algebra ring-theory linear-transformations ring-homomorphism polynomial-rings






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Servaes

21.1k33792




21.1k33792






New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 20 hours ago









nlin08

91




91




New contributor




nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






nlin08 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
    – Servaes
    16 hours ago










  • And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
    – reuns
    8 hours ago


















  • As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
    – Servaes
    16 hours ago










  • And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
    – reuns
    8 hours ago
















As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago




As it stands both statements you ask to show are false. What makes you believe they are true?
– Servaes
16 hours ago












And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago




And Servaes meant the non-trivial automorphism of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3})$ extends to an automorphism of $mathbb{R}$ (that we can't define without things like the axiom of choice) and $mathbb{R}[X]$
– reuns
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.



An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
$$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
$$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019922%2fhomomorphisms-and-automorphisms-on-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.



    An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
    $$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
    is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
    $$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
    for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.



      An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
      $$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
      is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
      $$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
      for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.



        An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
        $$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
        is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
        $$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
        for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        For the claim to be true you need the additional hypothesis that $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear.



        An $Bbb{R}$-linear ring homomorphism
        $$p: Bbb{R}[X] longrightarrow Bbb{R}[X]$$
        is determined by where it maps $X$. It follows immediately from the ring axioms that $p=phi_{p(X)}$. Indeed, if $p$ is $Bbb{R}$-linear then $p(r)=r$ for all $rinBbb{R}$, and your algebraic manipulations show that then
        $$p(f)=f(p(X))=phi_{p(X)}(f),$$
        for all $finBbb{R}[X]$. To see that the $Bbb{R}$-linear automorphisms are precisely the linear maps $p$ for which $p(X)$ is linear, note that $deg p(f)=deg p(X)cdotdeg f$ for all $finBbb{R}[X]$, so for $p$ to be surjective we must have $deg p(X)=1$. Check that $phi_g$ is invertible for all linear $g$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 9 hours ago

























        answered 16 hours ago









        Servaes

        21.1k33792




        21.1k33792






















            nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            nlin08 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019922%2fhomomorphisms-and-automorphisms-on-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna