Proving stochastic boundedness in rate of contraction posterior distribution
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a family of probability distributions $P_theta$ indexed by $theta in Theta$. The parameter space is endowed with some metric $d$. We assume that there is a true parameter $theta_0$, and we are interested of the convergence of the Bayesian posterior distribution, given a prior $Pi$. We denote the posterior distribution after $n$ samples by $Pi_n(cdot|X^{(n)})$.
The posterior distribution is said to contract at rate $epsilon_n to 0$ at $theta_0$ if $Pi_n(theta:d(theta,theta_0) > M_nepsilon_n | X^{(n)}) to 0$ in $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$ probability, for every $M_nto infty$ as $ntoinfty$ (i.e., regardless of how slow $M$ goes to infinity).
Now I have to proof the following proposition:
Suppose that the posterior distribution $Pi(cdot|X^{(n)})$ contracts
at rate $epsilon_n$ at $theta_0$. Then $hat{theta}_n$, defined as
the center of a (nearly) samllest ball that contains posterior mass at
least $frac{1}{2}$, satisfies $d(hattheta_n,theta_0) = O_P(epsilon_n)$ under $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$.
$O_P(epsilon_n)$ is not defined but I suppose it denotes stochastic boundedness (see wikipedia), that is, for $tildeepsilon >0$, there are $M, N in mathbb{N}$ such that for $n>N$, we have $P_{theta_0}^{(n)} ( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n > M) ) < tildeepsilon$.
The notes state the proof is very similar to a previous proof, which brought me to the following:
Let $B(theta,r)$ be the closed ball of radius $r$ centered at $theta$. Define $hat{r}_n(theta) = inf{r:Pi_n(B(theta,r)|X^{(n)}) geq frac{1}{2}}$.
Then $hat{r}_n(theta_0) < M_nepsilon_n$ with a probability tending to 1, with $M_n$ an arbitrary sequence with $M_n to infty$.
As we have chosen $hattheta_n$ as a nearly smallest ball, certainly $hat{r}_n(hattheta_n) leq hat{r}_n(theta_0) + frac{1}{n} < M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n}$.
Now, $B(theta_0,M_nepsilon_n)$ and $B(hattheta_n,hat{r}_n(hattheta_n))$ are not disjoint with probability tending to 1, since they would have a joined probability tending to 1.5. So:
$d(theta_0,hattheta_n) < 2M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n} implies d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n < 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$,
with probability tending to one. In other words, for $tildeepsilon >0$ there is some $N$ such that for $n>N$,
$P_{theta_0}( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n geq 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n} ) < tildeepsilon$.
However, if I understand stochastic boundedness correctly I need to somehow replace $2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$ with a fixed $M$. But since $M_n to infty$, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas on what I could do?
lecture notes
bayesian
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a family of probability distributions $P_theta$ indexed by $theta in Theta$. The parameter space is endowed with some metric $d$. We assume that there is a true parameter $theta_0$, and we are interested of the convergence of the Bayesian posterior distribution, given a prior $Pi$. We denote the posterior distribution after $n$ samples by $Pi_n(cdot|X^{(n)})$.
The posterior distribution is said to contract at rate $epsilon_n to 0$ at $theta_0$ if $Pi_n(theta:d(theta,theta_0) > M_nepsilon_n | X^{(n)}) to 0$ in $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$ probability, for every $M_nto infty$ as $ntoinfty$ (i.e., regardless of how slow $M$ goes to infinity).
Now I have to proof the following proposition:
Suppose that the posterior distribution $Pi(cdot|X^{(n)})$ contracts
at rate $epsilon_n$ at $theta_0$. Then $hat{theta}_n$, defined as
the center of a (nearly) samllest ball that contains posterior mass at
least $frac{1}{2}$, satisfies $d(hattheta_n,theta_0) = O_P(epsilon_n)$ under $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$.
$O_P(epsilon_n)$ is not defined but I suppose it denotes stochastic boundedness (see wikipedia), that is, for $tildeepsilon >0$, there are $M, N in mathbb{N}$ such that for $n>N$, we have $P_{theta_0}^{(n)} ( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n > M) ) < tildeepsilon$.
The notes state the proof is very similar to a previous proof, which brought me to the following:
Let $B(theta,r)$ be the closed ball of radius $r$ centered at $theta$. Define $hat{r}_n(theta) = inf{r:Pi_n(B(theta,r)|X^{(n)}) geq frac{1}{2}}$.
Then $hat{r}_n(theta_0) < M_nepsilon_n$ with a probability tending to 1, with $M_n$ an arbitrary sequence with $M_n to infty$.
As we have chosen $hattheta_n$ as a nearly smallest ball, certainly $hat{r}_n(hattheta_n) leq hat{r}_n(theta_0) + frac{1}{n} < M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n}$.
Now, $B(theta_0,M_nepsilon_n)$ and $B(hattheta_n,hat{r}_n(hattheta_n))$ are not disjoint with probability tending to 1, since they would have a joined probability tending to 1.5. So:
$d(theta_0,hattheta_n) < 2M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n} implies d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n < 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$,
with probability tending to one. In other words, for $tildeepsilon >0$ there is some $N$ such that for $n>N$,
$P_{theta_0}( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n geq 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n} ) < tildeepsilon$.
However, if I understand stochastic boundedness correctly I need to somehow replace $2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$ with a fixed $M$. But since $M_n to infty$, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas on what I could do?
lecture notes
bayesian
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a family of probability distributions $P_theta$ indexed by $theta in Theta$. The parameter space is endowed with some metric $d$. We assume that there is a true parameter $theta_0$, and we are interested of the convergence of the Bayesian posterior distribution, given a prior $Pi$. We denote the posterior distribution after $n$ samples by $Pi_n(cdot|X^{(n)})$.
The posterior distribution is said to contract at rate $epsilon_n to 0$ at $theta_0$ if $Pi_n(theta:d(theta,theta_0) > M_nepsilon_n | X^{(n)}) to 0$ in $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$ probability, for every $M_nto infty$ as $ntoinfty$ (i.e., regardless of how slow $M$ goes to infinity).
Now I have to proof the following proposition:
Suppose that the posterior distribution $Pi(cdot|X^{(n)})$ contracts
at rate $epsilon_n$ at $theta_0$. Then $hat{theta}_n$, defined as
the center of a (nearly) samllest ball that contains posterior mass at
least $frac{1}{2}$, satisfies $d(hattheta_n,theta_0) = O_P(epsilon_n)$ under $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$.
$O_P(epsilon_n)$ is not defined but I suppose it denotes stochastic boundedness (see wikipedia), that is, for $tildeepsilon >0$, there are $M, N in mathbb{N}$ such that for $n>N$, we have $P_{theta_0}^{(n)} ( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n > M) ) < tildeepsilon$.
The notes state the proof is very similar to a previous proof, which brought me to the following:
Let $B(theta,r)$ be the closed ball of radius $r$ centered at $theta$. Define $hat{r}_n(theta) = inf{r:Pi_n(B(theta,r)|X^{(n)}) geq frac{1}{2}}$.
Then $hat{r}_n(theta_0) < M_nepsilon_n$ with a probability tending to 1, with $M_n$ an arbitrary sequence with $M_n to infty$.
As we have chosen $hattheta_n$ as a nearly smallest ball, certainly $hat{r}_n(hattheta_n) leq hat{r}_n(theta_0) + frac{1}{n} < M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n}$.
Now, $B(theta_0,M_nepsilon_n)$ and $B(hattheta_n,hat{r}_n(hattheta_n))$ are not disjoint with probability tending to 1, since they would have a joined probability tending to 1.5. So:
$d(theta_0,hattheta_n) < 2M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n} implies d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n < 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$,
with probability tending to one. In other words, for $tildeepsilon >0$ there is some $N$ such that for $n>N$,
$P_{theta_0}( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n geq 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n} ) < tildeepsilon$.
However, if I understand stochastic boundedness correctly I need to somehow replace $2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$ with a fixed $M$. But since $M_n to infty$, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas on what I could do?
lecture notes
bayesian
Consider a family of probability distributions $P_theta$ indexed by $theta in Theta$. The parameter space is endowed with some metric $d$. We assume that there is a true parameter $theta_0$, and we are interested of the convergence of the Bayesian posterior distribution, given a prior $Pi$. We denote the posterior distribution after $n$ samples by $Pi_n(cdot|X^{(n)})$.
The posterior distribution is said to contract at rate $epsilon_n to 0$ at $theta_0$ if $Pi_n(theta:d(theta,theta_0) > M_nepsilon_n | X^{(n)}) to 0$ in $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$ probability, for every $M_nto infty$ as $ntoinfty$ (i.e., regardless of how slow $M$ goes to infinity).
Now I have to proof the following proposition:
Suppose that the posterior distribution $Pi(cdot|X^{(n)})$ contracts
at rate $epsilon_n$ at $theta_0$. Then $hat{theta}_n$, defined as
the center of a (nearly) samllest ball that contains posterior mass at
least $frac{1}{2}$, satisfies $d(hattheta_n,theta_0) = O_P(epsilon_n)$ under $P_{theta_0}^{(n)}$.
$O_P(epsilon_n)$ is not defined but I suppose it denotes stochastic boundedness (see wikipedia), that is, for $tildeepsilon >0$, there are $M, N in mathbb{N}$ such that for $n>N$, we have $P_{theta_0}^{(n)} ( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n > M) ) < tildeepsilon$.
The notes state the proof is very similar to a previous proof, which brought me to the following:
Let $B(theta,r)$ be the closed ball of radius $r$ centered at $theta$. Define $hat{r}_n(theta) = inf{r:Pi_n(B(theta,r)|X^{(n)}) geq frac{1}{2}}$.
Then $hat{r}_n(theta_0) < M_nepsilon_n$ with a probability tending to 1, with $M_n$ an arbitrary sequence with $M_n to infty$.
As we have chosen $hattheta_n$ as a nearly smallest ball, certainly $hat{r}_n(hattheta_n) leq hat{r}_n(theta_0) + frac{1}{n} < M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n}$.
Now, $B(theta_0,M_nepsilon_n)$ and $B(hattheta_n,hat{r}_n(hattheta_n))$ are not disjoint with probability tending to 1, since they would have a joined probability tending to 1.5. So:
$d(theta_0,hattheta_n) < 2M_nepsilon_n + frac{1}{n} implies d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n < 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$,
with probability tending to one. In other words, for $tildeepsilon >0$ there is some $N$ such that for $n>N$,
$P_{theta_0}( d(theta_0,hattheta_n)/epsilon_n geq 2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n} ) < tildeepsilon$.
However, if I understand stochastic boundedness correctly I need to somehow replace $2M_n + frac{1}{epsilon_n n}$ with a fixed $M$. But since $M_n to infty$, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas on what I could do?
lecture notes
bayesian
bayesian
asked May 13 '17 at 14:45
Scipio
1458
1458
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I think you're almost there. $X_n=O_p(a_n)$ when $P( | frac{X_n}{a_n} | ge M_{delta} ) < delta$. $M_{delta}$ is affected by the choice of $delta$. In other notations you can also write $M_{delta}$ as $M_{n}$ where $n > N(delta)$ s.t $ni P( |frac{X_n}{a_n}| ge M_n ) < delta$.
Bottom line is that in the definition of contraction rate, you could choose your $M_n$ as you please.
New contributor
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I think you're almost there. $X_n=O_p(a_n)$ when $P( | frac{X_n}{a_n} | ge M_{delta} ) < delta$. $M_{delta}$ is affected by the choice of $delta$. In other notations you can also write $M_{delta}$ as $M_{n}$ where $n > N(delta)$ s.t $ni P( |frac{X_n}{a_n}| ge M_n ) < delta$.
Bottom line is that in the definition of contraction rate, you could choose your $M_n$ as you please.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I think you're almost there. $X_n=O_p(a_n)$ when $P( | frac{X_n}{a_n} | ge M_{delta} ) < delta$. $M_{delta}$ is affected by the choice of $delta$. In other notations you can also write $M_{delta}$ as $M_{n}$ where $n > N(delta)$ s.t $ni P( |frac{X_n}{a_n}| ge M_n ) < delta$.
Bottom line is that in the definition of contraction rate, you could choose your $M_n$ as you please.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I think you're almost there. $X_n=O_p(a_n)$ when $P( | frac{X_n}{a_n} | ge M_{delta} ) < delta$. $M_{delta}$ is affected by the choice of $delta$. In other notations you can also write $M_{delta}$ as $M_{n}$ where $n > N(delta)$ s.t $ni P( |frac{X_n}{a_n}| ge M_n ) < delta$.
Bottom line is that in the definition of contraction rate, you could choose your $M_n$ as you please.
New contributor
I think you're almost there. $X_n=O_p(a_n)$ when $P( | frac{X_n}{a_n} | ge M_{delta} ) < delta$. $M_{delta}$ is affected by the choice of $delta$. In other notations you can also write $M_{delta}$ as $M_{n}$ where $n > N(delta)$ s.t $ni P( |frac{X_n}{a_n}| ge M_n ) < delta$.
Bottom line is that in the definition of contraction rate, you could choose your $M_n$ as you please.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 19 hours ago
user3373954
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2279347%2fproving-stochastic-boundedness-in-rate-of-contraction-posterior-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown