Let $mathbb{R}^n$ be endowed with the Euclidean metric $d_2$. Let S be a nonempty subset of $mathbb{R}^n$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
1) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ closed in S?
2) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ contained in the closure of ${yin S: d_2(x,y) > r}$ in S?
my intuition for both is yes...
For 1). I think I need to prove the complement of set in S is open. However, I don't know how to quantify the argument.
real-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
1) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ closed in S?
2) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ contained in the closure of ${yin S: d_2(x,y) > r}$ in S?
my intuition for both is yes...
For 1). I think I need to prove the complement of set in S is open. However, I don't know how to quantify the argument.
real-analysis
1
A metric is by definition continuous in the metric space. The preimage of an open set by a continuous function is open. This should solve most of the problems.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
17 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
1) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ closed in S?
2) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ contained in the closure of ${yin S: d_2(x,y) > r}$ in S?
my intuition for both is yes...
For 1). I think I need to prove the complement of set in S is open. However, I don't know how to quantify the argument.
real-analysis
1) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ closed in S?
2) Given $xin S$, is the set ${yin S: d_2(x,y) geq r}$ contained in the closure of ${yin S: d_2(x,y) > r}$ in S?
my intuition for both is yes...
For 1). I think I need to prove the complement of set in S is open. However, I don't know how to quantify the argument.
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked 17 hours ago
davidh
605
605
1
A metric is by definition continuous in the metric space. The preimage of an open set by a continuous function is open. This should solve most of the problems.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1
A metric is by definition continuous in the metric space. The preimage of an open set by a continuous function is open. This should solve most of the problems.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
17 hours ago
1
1
A metric is by definition continuous in the metric space. The preimage of an open set by a continuous function is open. This should solve most of the problems.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
17 hours ago
A metric is by definition continuous in the metric space. The preimage of an open set by a continuous function is open. This should solve most of the problems.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $S'$ be the set in the statement. Let ${x_k} subset S'$ and $x_k to x'$. Then $r leq d_2(x_k,x)leq d_2(x',x)+d_2(x_k,x')$. Let $k to infty $ to see that $x in S'$. hence $S'$ is closed.
Now let $d_2(x,y) geq r$. Let $x_k=y+frac 1 k (y-x)$. Then $d_2(x_k,y)=d_2(0,frac 1 k (y-x)) to 0$ as $ k to infty$ . Also, $$d_2(x_k,x)=d_2(y+frac 1 k (y-x),x)$$ $$=d_2((y-x+frac 1 k (y-x),0)$$ $$ =(1+frac 1 k) d_2(x,y) >d_2(x,y) geq r.$$ Hence $y$ is the limit of a sequence from ${z:d_2(x,z)>r}.$
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $S'$ be the set in the statement. Let ${x_k} subset S'$ and $x_k to x'$. Then $r leq d_2(x_k,x)leq d_2(x',x)+d_2(x_k,x')$. Let $k to infty $ to see that $x in S'$. hence $S'$ is closed.
Now let $d_2(x,y) geq r$. Let $x_k=y+frac 1 k (y-x)$. Then $d_2(x_k,y)=d_2(0,frac 1 k (y-x)) to 0$ as $ k to infty$ . Also, $$d_2(x_k,x)=d_2(y+frac 1 k (y-x),x)$$ $$=d_2((y-x+frac 1 k (y-x),0)$$ $$ =(1+frac 1 k) d_2(x,y) >d_2(x,y) geq r.$$ Hence $y$ is the limit of a sequence from ${z:d_2(x,z)>r}.$
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $S'$ be the set in the statement. Let ${x_k} subset S'$ and $x_k to x'$. Then $r leq d_2(x_k,x)leq d_2(x',x)+d_2(x_k,x')$. Let $k to infty $ to see that $x in S'$. hence $S'$ is closed.
Now let $d_2(x,y) geq r$. Let $x_k=y+frac 1 k (y-x)$. Then $d_2(x_k,y)=d_2(0,frac 1 k (y-x)) to 0$ as $ k to infty$ . Also, $$d_2(x_k,x)=d_2(y+frac 1 k (y-x),x)$$ $$=d_2((y-x+frac 1 k (y-x),0)$$ $$ =(1+frac 1 k) d_2(x,y) >d_2(x,y) geq r.$$ Hence $y$ is the limit of a sequence from ${z:d_2(x,z)>r}.$
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $S'$ be the set in the statement. Let ${x_k} subset S'$ and $x_k to x'$. Then $r leq d_2(x_k,x)leq d_2(x',x)+d_2(x_k,x')$. Let $k to infty $ to see that $x in S'$. hence $S'$ is closed.
Now let $d_2(x,y) geq r$. Let $x_k=y+frac 1 k (y-x)$. Then $d_2(x_k,y)=d_2(0,frac 1 k (y-x)) to 0$ as $ k to infty$ . Also, $$d_2(x_k,x)=d_2(y+frac 1 k (y-x),x)$$ $$=d_2((y-x+frac 1 k (y-x),0)$$ $$ =(1+frac 1 k) d_2(x,y) >d_2(x,y) geq r.$$ Hence $y$ is the limit of a sequence from ${z:d_2(x,z)>r}.$
Let $S'$ be the set in the statement. Let ${x_k} subset S'$ and $x_k to x'$. Then $r leq d_2(x_k,x)leq d_2(x',x)+d_2(x_k,x')$. Let $k to infty $ to see that $x in S'$. hence $S'$ is closed.
Now let $d_2(x,y) geq r$. Let $x_k=y+frac 1 k (y-x)$. Then $d_2(x_k,y)=d_2(0,frac 1 k (y-x)) to 0$ as $ k to infty$ . Also, $$d_2(x_k,x)=d_2(y+frac 1 k (y-x),x)$$ $$=d_2((y-x+frac 1 k (y-x),0)$$ $$ =(1+frac 1 k) d_2(x,y) >d_2(x,y) geq r.$$ Hence $y$ is the limit of a sequence from ${z:d_2(x,z)>r}.$
edited 17 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.3k31751
43.3k31751
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
i don't think I get the first part tho, is the sequence's limit x the same x in the question?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
@davidh Sorry, that was a mistake. I have corrected it.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
I see. however shouldn't the first inequality be $r <= d_2(x_k, x)$?
– davidh
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
@davidh Corrected that also. Hope I have fixed all the errors.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
Thanks. Could you explain how you got the (1+1/k)^n step?
– davidh
17 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019901%2flet-mathbbrn-be-endowed-with-the-euclidean-metric-d-2-let-s-be-a-nonemp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
A metric is by definition continuous in the metric space. The preimage of an open set by a continuous function is open. This should solve most of the problems.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
17 hours ago