Can the president put his own likeness on money?
Preface, I am unsure of all the powers the Federal Reserve possess or who controls the Reserve outside of congress.
However it is at the Federal level so I was wondering.
- What control over the Federal Reserve does the president actually have with/out executive orders?
- Could he put himself on some denomination of money or take others out?
united-states president currency federal-reserve executive-order
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
add a comment |
Preface, I am unsure of all the powers the Federal Reserve possess or who controls the Reserve outside of congress.
However it is at the Federal level so I was wondering.
- What control over the Federal Reserve does the president actually have with/out executive orders?
- Could he put himself on some denomination of money or take others out?
united-states president currency federal-reserve executive-order
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
3
Executive orders are not mandates such as decrees. Executive Orders are orders to enforce or ignore existing laws to law enforcement officials.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 7 at 15:23
5
As a non native speaker I was confused first what does this 'idiom' mean. Didn't expect the meaning to be literal... :)
– mpasko256
Dec 7 at 21:10
2
@FrankCedeno An Executive Order is an order to members of the executive branch. It can be to enforce or ignore a law, or to do anything else, and it can be to anyone in the executive branch, not just LEO.
– Acccumulation
Dec 7 at 21:21
"He's as crooked as a Three-Dollar bill" "Actually, he on them now."
– Davy M
Dec 8 at 2:00
1
@Acccumulation, Incorrect, the executive order is strictly for the enforcement of existing laws (or the manner of enforcement). For other orders to the executive branch, the President will use updates to the CFR or other memos. While there is some minor cross over, he cannot decree a new law using Executive order.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 10 at 16:46
add a comment |
Preface, I am unsure of all the powers the Federal Reserve possess or who controls the Reserve outside of congress.
However it is at the Federal level so I was wondering.
- What control over the Federal Reserve does the president actually have with/out executive orders?
- Could he put himself on some denomination of money or take others out?
united-states president currency federal-reserve executive-order
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
Preface, I am unsure of all the powers the Federal Reserve possess or who controls the Reserve outside of congress.
However it is at the Federal level so I was wondering.
- What control over the Federal Reserve does the president actually have with/out executive orders?
- Could he put himself on some denomination of money or take others out?
united-states president currency federal-reserve executive-order
united-states president currency federal-reserve executive-order
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
edited Dec 8 at 14:36
Brythan
66k7139226
66k7139226
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
asked Dec 7 at 12:21
SCFi
428221
428221
3
Executive orders are not mandates such as decrees. Executive Orders are orders to enforce or ignore existing laws to law enforcement officials.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 7 at 15:23
5
As a non native speaker I was confused first what does this 'idiom' mean. Didn't expect the meaning to be literal... :)
– mpasko256
Dec 7 at 21:10
2
@FrankCedeno An Executive Order is an order to members of the executive branch. It can be to enforce or ignore a law, or to do anything else, and it can be to anyone in the executive branch, not just LEO.
– Acccumulation
Dec 7 at 21:21
"He's as crooked as a Three-Dollar bill" "Actually, he on them now."
– Davy M
Dec 8 at 2:00
1
@Acccumulation, Incorrect, the executive order is strictly for the enforcement of existing laws (or the manner of enforcement). For other orders to the executive branch, the President will use updates to the CFR or other memos. While there is some minor cross over, he cannot decree a new law using Executive order.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 10 at 16:46
add a comment |
3
Executive orders are not mandates such as decrees. Executive Orders are orders to enforce or ignore existing laws to law enforcement officials.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 7 at 15:23
5
As a non native speaker I was confused first what does this 'idiom' mean. Didn't expect the meaning to be literal... :)
– mpasko256
Dec 7 at 21:10
2
@FrankCedeno An Executive Order is an order to members of the executive branch. It can be to enforce or ignore a law, or to do anything else, and it can be to anyone in the executive branch, not just LEO.
– Acccumulation
Dec 7 at 21:21
"He's as crooked as a Three-Dollar bill" "Actually, he on them now."
– Davy M
Dec 8 at 2:00
1
@Acccumulation, Incorrect, the executive order is strictly for the enforcement of existing laws (or the manner of enforcement). For other orders to the executive branch, the President will use updates to the CFR or other memos. While there is some minor cross over, he cannot decree a new law using Executive order.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 10 at 16:46
3
3
Executive orders are not mandates such as decrees. Executive Orders are orders to enforce or ignore existing laws to law enforcement officials.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 7 at 15:23
Executive orders are not mandates such as decrees. Executive Orders are orders to enforce or ignore existing laws to law enforcement officials.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 7 at 15:23
5
5
As a non native speaker I was confused first what does this 'idiom' mean. Didn't expect the meaning to be literal... :)
– mpasko256
Dec 7 at 21:10
As a non native speaker I was confused first what does this 'idiom' mean. Didn't expect the meaning to be literal... :)
– mpasko256
Dec 7 at 21:10
2
2
@FrankCedeno An Executive Order is an order to members of the executive branch. It can be to enforce or ignore a law, or to do anything else, and it can be to anyone in the executive branch, not just LEO.
– Acccumulation
Dec 7 at 21:21
@FrankCedeno An Executive Order is an order to members of the executive branch. It can be to enforce or ignore a law, or to do anything else, and it can be to anyone in the executive branch, not just LEO.
– Acccumulation
Dec 7 at 21:21
"He's as crooked as a Three-Dollar bill" "Actually, he on them now."
– Davy M
Dec 8 at 2:00
"He's as crooked as a Three-Dollar bill" "Actually, he on them now."
– Davy M
Dec 8 at 2:00
1
1
@Acccumulation, Incorrect, the executive order is strictly for the enforcement of existing laws (or the manner of enforcement). For other orders to the executive branch, the President will use updates to the CFR or other memos. While there is some minor cross over, he cannot decree a new law using Executive order.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 10 at 16:46
@Acccumulation, Incorrect, the executive order is strictly for the enforcement of existing laws (or the manner of enforcement). For other orders to the executive branch, the President will use updates to the CFR or other memos. While there is some minor cross over, he cannot decree a new law using Executive order.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 10 at 16:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As per U.S. Code › Title 31 › Subtitle IV › Chapter 51 › Subchapter II › § 5114 ("31 U.S. Code § 5114 - Engraving and printing currency and security documents")
(b) ... Only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency and securities. ...
So, a President cannot put themselves on Money, while they are alive.
Now, let's assume the President somehow finds a legal loophole (e.g. direct to put their face on the bill after they die, and the successor doesn't overturn it). What other limitations or lack thereof are there?
the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 required that none of the funds set aside for either the Treasury or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used to redesign the $1 bill. So, President can't put themselves on $1.
as per BBC (can't find a primary source for this yet, but Wikipedia agrees):
The current Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for selecting the lucky few featured on US bills
Since SecTreas is a cabinet position directly reporting to the President, presumably, the answer to your question is "Yes" as far as "can the President generally decide who goes on the bills, within the rules".
Notably, despite the question's suspicions, this has nothing to do with Federal Reserve.
Also, obviously, an Act of Congress can override SecTreas (as it did with $1 bill).
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
4
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35951%2fcan-the-president-put-his-own-likeness-on-money%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As per U.S. Code › Title 31 › Subtitle IV › Chapter 51 › Subchapter II › § 5114 ("31 U.S. Code § 5114 - Engraving and printing currency and security documents")
(b) ... Only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency and securities. ...
So, a President cannot put themselves on Money, while they are alive.
Now, let's assume the President somehow finds a legal loophole (e.g. direct to put their face on the bill after they die, and the successor doesn't overturn it). What other limitations or lack thereof are there?
the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 required that none of the funds set aside for either the Treasury or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used to redesign the $1 bill. So, President can't put themselves on $1.
as per BBC (can't find a primary source for this yet, but Wikipedia agrees):
The current Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for selecting the lucky few featured on US bills
Since SecTreas is a cabinet position directly reporting to the President, presumably, the answer to your question is "Yes" as far as "can the President generally decide who goes on the bills, within the rules".
Notably, despite the question's suspicions, this has nothing to do with Federal Reserve.
Also, obviously, an Act of Congress can override SecTreas (as it did with $1 bill).
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
4
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
|
show 1 more comment
As per U.S. Code › Title 31 › Subtitle IV › Chapter 51 › Subchapter II › § 5114 ("31 U.S. Code § 5114 - Engraving and printing currency and security documents")
(b) ... Only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency and securities. ...
So, a President cannot put themselves on Money, while they are alive.
Now, let's assume the President somehow finds a legal loophole (e.g. direct to put their face on the bill after they die, and the successor doesn't overturn it). What other limitations or lack thereof are there?
the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 required that none of the funds set aside for either the Treasury or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used to redesign the $1 bill. So, President can't put themselves on $1.
as per BBC (can't find a primary source for this yet, but Wikipedia agrees):
The current Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for selecting the lucky few featured on US bills
Since SecTreas is a cabinet position directly reporting to the President, presumably, the answer to your question is "Yes" as far as "can the President generally decide who goes on the bills, within the rules".
Notably, despite the question's suspicions, this has nothing to do with Federal Reserve.
Also, obviously, an Act of Congress can override SecTreas (as it did with $1 bill).
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
4
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
|
show 1 more comment
As per U.S. Code › Title 31 › Subtitle IV › Chapter 51 › Subchapter II › § 5114 ("31 U.S. Code § 5114 - Engraving and printing currency and security documents")
(b) ... Only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency and securities. ...
So, a President cannot put themselves on Money, while they are alive.
Now, let's assume the President somehow finds a legal loophole (e.g. direct to put their face on the bill after they die, and the successor doesn't overturn it). What other limitations or lack thereof are there?
the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 required that none of the funds set aside for either the Treasury or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used to redesign the $1 bill. So, President can't put themselves on $1.
as per BBC (can't find a primary source for this yet, but Wikipedia agrees):
The current Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for selecting the lucky few featured on US bills
Since SecTreas is a cabinet position directly reporting to the President, presumably, the answer to your question is "Yes" as far as "can the President generally decide who goes on the bills, within the rules".
Notably, despite the question's suspicions, this has nothing to do with Federal Reserve.
Also, obviously, an Act of Congress can override SecTreas (as it did with $1 bill).
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
As per U.S. Code › Title 31 › Subtitle IV › Chapter 51 › Subchapter II › § 5114 ("31 U.S. Code § 5114 - Engraving and printing currency and security documents")
(b) ... Only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency and securities. ...
So, a President cannot put themselves on Money, while they are alive.
Now, let's assume the President somehow finds a legal loophole (e.g. direct to put their face on the bill after they die, and the successor doesn't overturn it). What other limitations or lack thereof are there?
the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 required that none of the funds set aside for either the Treasury or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used to redesign the $1 bill. So, President can't put themselves on $1.
as per BBC (can't find a primary source for this yet, but Wikipedia agrees):
The current Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for selecting the lucky few featured on US bills
Since SecTreas is a cabinet position directly reporting to the President, presumably, the answer to your question is "Yes" as far as "can the President generally decide who goes on the bills, within the rules".
Notably, despite the question's suspicions, this has nothing to do with Federal Reserve.
Also, obviously, an Act of Congress can override SecTreas (as it did with $1 bill).
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
edited Dec 7 at 13:08
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
answered Dec 7 at 12:50
user4012
69.1k15151300
69.1k15151300
4
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
|
show 1 more comment
4
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
4
4
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
I suppose a President could direct his SecTreas to do this if he dies while in office. SecTreas would probably have to do it quickly, before the new POTUS has time to form a new cabinet and replace him.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 17:07
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@Barmar it's unlikely to happen then without the approval of the replacement President (presumably the prior VP). The latency in designing the bills, approving the design, creating the plates, distributing plates to the mints, and printing the first bills is long enough that the new President would almost certainly have time to stop it if he/she cared to.
– asgallant
Dec 7 at 20:15
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant Of course. The sitting POTUS would have to direct the Treasury to perform all that preparation before he dies, which would be quite expensive for "just in case". Maybe if he knows he has a fatal disease.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 20:32
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
@asgallant I'd imagine he could get the ball rolling on the design if someone were nearing death and expected to be honored with a bill after he passes.
– Barmar
Dec 7 at 21:12
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
Keep in mind that JFK appeared on the half dollar coin VERY soon after his death. While the engravings needed for paper money are different than those needed for coinage, the fact the JFK half dollar was minted about 2 months after his death means a sitting president who presumably had a terminal illness might be able to get a change in place before their replacement was able to undo things.
– Julie in Austin
Dec 7 at 21:19
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35951%2fcan-the-president-put-his-own-likeness-on-money%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Executive orders are not mandates such as decrees. Executive Orders are orders to enforce or ignore existing laws to law enforcement officials.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 7 at 15:23
5
As a non native speaker I was confused first what does this 'idiom' mean. Didn't expect the meaning to be literal... :)
– mpasko256
Dec 7 at 21:10
2
@FrankCedeno An Executive Order is an order to members of the executive branch. It can be to enforce or ignore a law, or to do anything else, and it can be to anyone in the executive branch, not just LEO.
– Acccumulation
Dec 7 at 21:21
"He's as crooked as a Three-Dollar bill" "Actually, he on them now."
– Davy M
Dec 8 at 2:00
1
@Acccumulation, Incorrect, the executive order is strictly for the enforcement of existing laws (or the manner of enforcement). For other orders to the executive branch, the President will use updates to the CFR or other memos. While there is some minor cross over, he cannot decree a new law using Executive order.
– Frank Cedeno
Dec 10 at 16:46