Infinite Subcritical Reactor with a plane Source; Deriving analytical solution with boundary conditions












1














This might as well be a mathematics question since I am only looking for a way to solve a basic model of the neutrondistribution in an infinite plane subcritical reactor.



So the model for the neutrondistribution looks like this:



$frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)=0$



The source of the neutrons is located at $x=0$, the net flow of neutrons is $Q$ per second and per unit area (perpendicular to the $x$-axis).



Now, we seperate this into two regions, namely $x<0$ and $x>0$. For the region $x>0$ we obtain the second order differential equation $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi = 0$ which can be solved directly, yielding
$phi(x) =Aexp{(gamma x)}+Cexp{(-gamma x)}$. Naturally as $xrightarrow infty$ then $phi rightarrow 0$, so $A=0$. We can yield a similar result for the other result, namely $phi(x)=Dexp{(gamma x)}$, $x<0$. At the boundary we have that these two functions (let's name them $phi_1$ and $phi_2$ for $x<0$ and $x>0$, respectively), have the same value: $phi_1(0)=phi_2(0)$. This yields $D=C$.



Now, the last boundary condition is tricky. My teacher tells me that that the last final BC that sets the value of $D$ comes from integrating the first equation:



$lim_{epsilon to 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]$



I am not sure how this gives me anything, since the integral can be seperated into the different regions where we know that the differential equation equals zero. I got a (reasonable) result by using Fick's law instead, with



$lim_{x to 0}(-Dfrac{dphi}{dx})=Q/2$



How do I solve this problem going the way my teacher hinted about? This is supposedly the more mathematical way.



Best regards SimpleP.






differential-equations physics







share|cite|improve this question















migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Dec 7 at 15:16


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.




















    1














    This might as well be a mathematics question since I am only looking for a way to solve a basic model of the neutrondistribution in an infinite plane subcritical reactor.



    So the model for the neutrondistribution looks like this:



    $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)=0$



    The source of the neutrons is located at $x=0$, the net flow of neutrons is $Q$ per second and per unit area (perpendicular to the $x$-axis).



    Now, we seperate this into two regions, namely $x<0$ and $x>0$. For the region $x>0$ we obtain the second order differential equation $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi = 0$ which can be solved directly, yielding
    $phi(x) =Aexp{(gamma x)}+Cexp{(-gamma x)}$. Naturally as $xrightarrow infty$ then $phi rightarrow 0$, so $A=0$. We can yield a similar result for the other result, namely $phi(x)=Dexp{(gamma x)}$, $x<0$. At the boundary we have that these two functions (let's name them $phi_1$ and $phi_2$ for $x<0$ and $x>0$, respectively), have the same value: $phi_1(0)=phi_2(0)$. This yields $D=C$.



    Now, the last boundary condition is tricky. My teacher tells me that that the last final BC that sets the value of $D$ comes from integrating the first equation:



    $lim_{epsilon to 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]$



    I am not sure how this gives me anything, since the integral can be seperated into the different regions where we know that the differential equation equals zero. I got a (reasonable) result by using Fick's law instead, with



    $lim_{x to 0}(-Dfrac{dphi}{dx})=Q/2$



    How do I solve this problem going the way my teacher hinted about? This is supposedly the more mathematical way.



    Best regards SimpleP.






    differential-equations physics







    share|cite|improve this question















    migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Dec 7 at 15:16


    This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.


















      1












      1








      1







      This might as well be a mathematics question since I am only looking for a way to solve a basic model of the neutrondistribution in an infinite plane subcritical reactor.



      So the model for the neutrondistribution looks like this:



      $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)=0$



      The source of the neutrons is located at $x=0$, the net flow of neutrons is $Q$ per second and per unit area (perpendicular to the $x$-axis).



      Now, we seperate this into two regions, namely $x<0$ and $x>0$. For the region $x>0$ we obtain the second order differential equation $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi = 0$ which can be solved directly, yielding
      $phi(x) =Aexp{(gamma x)}+Cexp{(-gamma x)}$. Naturally as $xrightarrow infty$ then $phi rightarrow 0$, so $A=0$. We can yield a similar result for the other result, namely $phi(x)=Dexp{(gamma x)}$, $x<0$. At the boundary we have that these two functions (let's name them $phi_1$ and $phi_2$ for $x<0$ and $x>0$, respectively), have the same value: $phi_1(0)=phi_2(0)$. This yields $D=C$.



      Now, the last boundary condition is tricky. My teacher tells me that that the last final BC that sets the value of $D$ comes from integrating the first equation:



      $lim_{epsilon to 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]$



      I am not sure how this gives me anything, since the integral can be seperated into the different regions where we know that the differential equation equals zero. I got a (reasonable) result by using Fick's law instead, with



      $lim_{x to 0}(-Dfrac{dphi}{dx})=Q/2$



      How do I solve this problem going the way my teacher hinted about? This is supposedly the more mathematical way.



      Best regards SimpleP.






      differential-equations physics







      share|cite|improve this question















      This might as well be a mathematics question since I am only looking for a way to solve a basic model of the neutrondistribution in an infinite plane subcritical reactor.



      So the model for the neutrondistribution looks like this:



      $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)=0$



      The source of the neutrons is located at $x=0$, the net flow of neutrons is $Q$ per second and per unit area (perpendicular to the $x$-axis).



      Now, we seperate this into two regions, namely $x<0$ and $x>0$. For the region $x>0$ we obtain the second order differential equation $frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi = 0$ which can be solved directly, yielding
      $phi(x) =Aexp{(gamma x)}+Cexp{(-gamma x)}$. Naturally as $xrightarrow infty$ then $phi rightarrow 0$, so $A=0$. We can yield a similar result for the other result, namely $phi(x)=Dexp{(gamma x)}$, $x<0$. At the boundary we have that these two functions (let's name them $phi_1$ and $phi_2$ for $x<0$ and $x>0$, respectively), have the same value: $phi_1(0)=phi_2(0)$. This yields $D=C$.



      Now, the last boundary condition is tricky. My teacher tells me that that the last final BC that sets the value of $D$ comes from integrating the first equation:



      $lim_{epsilon to 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^{2}phi}{{dx}^{2}}-gamma^{2}phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]$



      I am not sure how this gives me anything, since the integral can be seperated into the different regions where we know that the differential equation equals zero. I got a (reasonable) result by using Fick's law instead, with



      $lim_{x to 0}(-Dfrac{dphi}{dx})=Q/2$



      How do I solve this problem going the way my teacher hinted about? This is supposedly the more mathematical way.



      Best regards SimpleP.






      differential-equations physics




      differential-equations physics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 8 at 8:11









      Martin Sleziak

      44.6k7115270




      44.6k7115270










      asked Nov 30 at 20:44









      SimpleProgrammer

      276




      276




      migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Dec 7 at 15:16


      This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.






      migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Dec 7 at 15:16


      This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Okay, so I got an answer (finally) to this question. I am going to write the solution below.



          $lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}-gamma^2phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]dx=lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}(int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}dx-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx+int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx)$.



          Now the first trem integrates to $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}[phi'(epsilon)-phi'(-epsilon)]=phi'(0+)-phi'(0-)$



          The second term becomes $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}(-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx)={Continuous:and:finite:at:boundary}=0$



          The third term just becomes, per definition $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx=frac{Q}{D}$



          You put this back into the equation and you obtain Fick's law through purely mathematical means. Best regards.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029996%2finfinite-subcritical-reactor-with-a-plane-source-deriving-analytical-solution-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Okay, so I got an answer (finally) to this question. I am going to write the solution below.



            $lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}-gamma^2phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]dx=lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}(int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}dx-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx+int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx)$.



            Now the first trem integrates to $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}[phi'(epsilon)-phi'(-epsilon)]=phi'(0+)-phi'(0-)$



            The second term becomes $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}(-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx)={Continuous:and:finite:at:boundary}=0$



            The third term just becomes, per definition $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx=frac{Q}{D}$



            You put this back into the equation and you obtain Fick's law through purely mathematical means. Best regards.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Okay, so I got an answer (finally) to this question. I am going to write the solution below.



              $lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}-gamma^2phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]dx=lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}(int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}dx-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx+int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx)$.



              Now the first trem integrates to $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}[phi'(epsilon)-phi'(-epsilon)]=phi'(0+)-phi'(0-)$



              The second term becomes $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}(-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx)={Continuous:and:finite:at:boundary}=0$



              The third term just becomes, per definition $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx=frac{Q}{D}$



              You put this back into the equation and you obtain Fick's law through purely mathematical means. Best regards.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Okay, so I got an answer (finally) to this question. I am going to write the solution below.



                $lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}-gamma^2phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]dx=lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}(int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}dx-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx+int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx)$.



                Now the first trem integrates to $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}[phi'(epsilon)-phi'(-epsilon)]=phi'(0+)-phi'(0-)$



                The second term becomes $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}(-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx)={Continuous:and:finite:at:boundary}=0$



                The third term just becomes, per definition $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx=frac{Q}{D}$



                You put this back into the equation and you obtain Fick's law through purely mathematical means. Best regards.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Okay, so I got an answer (finally) to this question. I am going to write the solution below.



                $lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}[frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}-gamma^2phi+frac{Q}{D}delta(x)]dx=lim_{epsilonrightarrow 0}(int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{d^2phi}{dx^2}dx-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx+int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx)$.



                Now the first trem integrates to $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}[phi'(epsilon)-phi'(-epsilon)]=phi'(0+)-phi'(0-)$



                The second term becomes $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}(-int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}gamma^2phi dx)={Continuous:and:finite:at:boundary}=0$



                The third term just becomes, per definition $lim_{epsilonrightarrow0}int_{-epsilon}^{epsilon}frac{Q}{D}delta(x)dx=frac{Q}{D}$



                You put this back into the equation and you obtain Fick's law through purely mathematical means. Best regards.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 8 at 11:37









                SimpleProgrammer

                276




                276






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029996%2finfinite-subcritical-reactor-with-a-plane-source-deriving-analytical-solution-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Image
                    .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
                    Read more

                    Cabo Verde

                    Image
                      Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º) ...
                    Read more

                    Gyllenstierna

                    Image
                    .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
                    Read more