$A$ is similar to $Diag(a_1,…,a_n)$. Then the sum of elements in A's diagonal is $a_1+…+a_n$












0












$begingroup$


Let $D=Diag(a_1,...,a_n)$ denote the diagonal matrix with diagonal $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$. I noticed that if $A$ and $D$ are similar marices, then the sum of elements in $A$'s diagonal is also $a_1+...+a_n$.
I could not find a counter example, and I'm not sure how to prove it. Is it always true? If so, I would love to see a proof using only the fact that there exists $P$ such that $A=P^{-1} cdot D cdot P$,if there is one, because that's all I know about similar matrices right now. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum of the diagonal is called trace. It satisfies $tr(AB)=tr(BA)$ , just calculate. Therefore the trace of similar matrices are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – Card_Trick
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49
















0












$begingroup$


Let $D=Diag(a_1,...,a_n)$ denote the diagonal matrix with diagonal $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$. I noticed that if $A$ and $D$ are similar marices, then the sum of elements in $A$'s diagonal is also $a_1+...+a_n$.
I could not find a counter example, and I'm not sure how to prove it. Is it always true? If so, I would love to see a proof using only the fact that there exists $P$ such that $A=P^{-1} cdot D cdot P$,if there is one, because that's all I know about similar matrices right now. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum of the diagonal is called trace. It satisfies $tr(AB)=tr(BA)$ , just calculate. Therefore the trace of similar matrices are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – Card_Trick
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $D=Diag(a_1,...,a_n)$ denote the diagonal matrix with diagonal $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$. I noticed that if $A$ and $D$ are similar marices, then the sum of elements in $A$'s diagonal is also $a_1+...+a_n$.
I could not find a counter example, and I'm not sure how to prove it. Is it always true? If so, I would love to see a proof using only the fact that there exists $P$ such that $A=P^{-1} cdot D cdot P$,if there is one, because that's all I know about similar matrices right now. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $D=Diag(a_1,...,a_n)$ denote the diagonal matrix with diagonal $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$. I noticed that if $A$ and $D$ are similar marices, then the sum of elements in $A$'s diagonal is also $a_1+...+a_n$.
I could not find a counter example, and I'm not sure how to prove it. Is it always true? If so, I would love to see a proof using only the fact that there exists $P$ such that $A=P^{-1} cdot D cdot P$,if there is one, because that's all I know about similar matrices right now. Thank you!







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 29 '18 at 17:45









OmerOmer

3619




3619








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum of the diagonal is called trace. It satisfies $tr(AB)=tr(BA)$ , just calculate. Therefore the trace of similar matrices are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – Card_Trick
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum of the diagonal is called trace. It satisfies $tr(AB)=tr(BA)$ , just calculate. Therefore the trace of similar matrices are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – Card_Trick
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49








1




1




$begingroup$
The sum of the diagonal is called trace. It satisfies $tr(AB)=tr(BA)$ , just calculate. Therefore the trace of similar matrices are equal.
$endgroup$
– Card_Trick
Dec 29 '18 at 17:49




$begingroup$
The sum of the diagonal is called trace. It satisfies $tr(AB)=tr(BA)$ , just calculate. Therefore the trace of similar matrices are equal.
$endgroup$
– Card_Trick
Dec 29 '18 at 17:49










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The sum of the diagonal elements of a matrix is called the trace of a matrix. Use the decomposition $A = P^{-1} D P$ as well as the following property of trace:




$$text{tr}(M_1 M_2 M_3) = text{tr}(M_2 M_3 M_1).$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michh
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Omer
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:56











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056078%2fa-is-similar-to-diaga-1-a-n-then-the-sum-of-elements-in-as-diagonal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The sum of the diagonal elements of a matrix is called the trace of a matrix. Use the decomposition $A = P^{-1} D P$ as well as the following property of trace:




$$text{tr}(M_1 M_2 M_3) = text{tr}(M_2 M_3 M_1).$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michh
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Omer
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:56
















1












$begingroup$

The sum of the diagonal elements of a matrix is called the trace of a matrix. Use the decomposition $A = P^{-1} D P$ as well as the following property of trace:




$$text{tr}(M_1 M_2 M_3) = text{tr}(M_2 M_3 M_1).$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michh
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Omer
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:56














1












1








1





$begingroup$

The sum of the diagonal elements of a matrix is called the trace of a matrix. Use the decomposition $A = P^{-1} D P$ as well as the following property of trace:




$$text{tr}(M_1 M_2 M_3) = text{tr}(M_2 M_3 M_1).$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The sum of the diagonal elements of a matrix is called the trace of a matrix. Use the decomposition $A = P^{-1} D P$ as well as the following property of trace:




$$text{tr}(M_1 M_2 M_3) = text{tr}(M_2 M_3 M_1).$$








share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 29 '18 at 17:47









angryavianangryavian

41.6k23381




41.6k23381








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michh
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Omer
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:56














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michh
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Omer
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Dec 29 '18 at 17:56








3




3




$begingroup$
To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 29 '18 at 17:49




$begingroup$
To prove the mentioned property you only need the simpler $text{tr}(AB) = text{tr}(BA)$.
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 29 '18 at 17:49












$begingroup$
@angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
$endgroup$
– Omer
Dec 29 '18 at 17:49




$begingroup$
@angryavian Nice, thanks. The proof of that property is just as technical as multiply those matrices and see the diagonal sum is the same?
$endgroup$
– Omer
Dec 29 '18 at 17:49




1




1




$begingroup$
@Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Dec 29 '18 at 17:56




$begingroup$
@Omer Yes, you can prove it directly in that manner. And as others mentioned, it suffices to just deal with the product of two matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Dec 29 '18 at 17:56


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056078%2fa-is-similar-to-diaga-1-a-n-then-the-sum-of-elements-in-as-diagonal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna