Show that $OX=OY$.
$begingroup$
Let $O$ the circumcenter of an acute triangle $ABC$. Let $alpha $ the circle trough $A $ and $B $ tangent to $[AC] $, and $beta $ the circle trough $A, C $ tangent to $[AB] $. A line trough $A $ intersects the second time the circles $alpha $ and $beta $ in $X $ and $Y $. Show that $OX=OY $.
I try to check that the second point of intersection of the circles is $O $. With GeoGebra this fact is false.
geometry euclidean-geometry triangle circle geometric-transformation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $O$ the circumcenter of an acute triangle $ABC$. Let $alpha $ the circle trough $A $ and $B $ tangent to $[AC] $, and $beta $ the circle trough $A, C $ tangent to $[AB] $. A line trough $A $ intersects the second time the circles $alpha $ and $beta $ in $X $ and $Y $. Show that $OX=OY $.
I try to check that the second point of intersection of the circles is $O $. With GeoGebra this fact is false.
geometry euclidean-geometry triangle circle geometric-transformation
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
If you already have a geogebra drawing, why don’t you include it in the post. It would be more helpful and appealing.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 7 '18 at 14:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $O$ the circumcenter of an acute triangle $ABC$. Let $alpha $ the circle trough $A $ and $B $ tangent to $[AC] $, and $beta $ the circle trough $A, C $ tangent to $[AB] $. A line trough $A $ intersects the second time the circles $alpha $ and $beta $ in $X $ and $Y $. Show that $OX=OY $.
I try to check that the second point of intersection of the circles is $O $. With GeoGebra this fact is false.
geometry euclidean-geometry triangle circle geometric-transformation
$endgroup$
Let $O$ the circumcenter of an acute triangle $ABC$. Let $alpha $ the circle trough $A $ and $B $ tangent to $[AC] $, and $beta $ the circle trough $A, C $ tangent to $[AB] $. A line trough $A $ intersects the second time the circles $alpha $ and $beta $ in $X $ and $Y $. Show that $OX=OY $.
I try to check that the second point of intersection of the circles is $O $. With GeoGebra this fact is false.
geometry euclidean-geometry triangle circle geometric-transformation
geometry euclidean-geometry triangle circle geometric-transformation
edited Dec 29 '18 at 15:16
greedoid
44k1155109
44k1155109
asked Nov 7 '18 at 14:10
rafarafa
606212
606212
3
$begingroup$
If you already have a geogebra drawing, why don’t you include it in the post. It would be more helpful and appealing.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 7 '18 at 14:25
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
If you already have a geogebra drawing, why don’t you include it in the post. It would be more helpful and appealing.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 7 '18 at 14:25
3
3
$begingroup$
If you already have a geogebra drawing, why don’t you include it in the post. It would be more helpful and appealing.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 7 '18 at 14:25
$begingroup$
If you already have a geogebra drawing, why don’t you include it in the post. It would be more helpful and appealing.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 7 '18 at 14:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since I’m on the phone and can’t type properly I will make some hints:
- Show that triangles $ABX$ and $ACY$ are similar.
- Show that $AEOD$ is a parallelogram.
- Show that triangles $XEO$ and $ODY$ are congruent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My proof does not use similarity. So it's not just a copy of Quang's (excellent) idea.
Notice that:
$$ODbot AB,space EAbot AB implies DOparallel AE$$
$$OEbot AC,space DAbot AC implies DAparallel OE$$
Obviously, quadrilateral ADOE is a parallelogram (opposite sides are parallel) and because of that:
$$DX=DA=OEtag{1}$$
$$DO=AE=EYtag{2}$$
Introduce angles $delta=angle EAY$, $gamma=angle BAC$
$$angle AEY=180^circ-2delta$$
$$angle AEO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles ∠AEO and ∠BAC have perpendicular legs)
$$angle OEY=360^circ-angle AEY -angle AEO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{3}$$
On the other side opposite angles in parallelogram $angle DAE$ and $angle DOE$ are equal and $angle DOE$ is obtuse angle with perpendicular legs with respect to angle $angle BAC=gamma$:
$$angle DAE=angle DOE=180^circ-gamma$$
$$angle DAX=180^circ-angle DAE-angle EAY=gamma-delta$$
$$angle DXA=angle DAX=gamma-delta$$
$$angle XDA=180^circ-angle DAX-angle DXA=180^circ-2gamma+2delta$$
$$angle ADO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles $angle ADO$ and $angle BAC$ have perpendicular legs)
Finally:
$$angle XDO=angle XDA+angle ADO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{4}$$
From (3) and (4):
$$angle XDO=angle OEYtag{5}$$
Because of (1), (2) and (5) triangles $triangle XDO$ and $triangle OEY$ are congruent by SAS so it must be that $OX=OY$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2988570%2fshow-that-ox-oy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since I’m on the phone and can’t type properly I will make some hints:
- Show that triangles $ABX$ and $ACY$ are similar.
- Show that $AEOD$ is a parallelogram.
- Show that triangles $XEO$ and $ODY$ are congruent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since I’m on the phone and can’t type properly I will make some hints:
- Show that triangles $ABX$ and $ACY$ are similar.
- Show that $AEOD$ is a parallelogram.
- Show that triangles $XEO$ and $ODY$ are congruent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since I’m on the phone and can’t type properly I will make some hints:
- Show that triangles $ABX$ and $ACY$ are similar.
- Show that $AEOD$ is a parallelogram.
- Show that triangles $XEO$ and $ODY$ are congruent.
$endgroup$
Since I’m on the phone and can’t type properly I will make some hints:
- Show that triangles $ABX$ and $ACY$ are similar.
- Show that $AEOD$ is a parallelogram.
- Show that triangles $XEO$ and $ODY$ are congruent.
answered Nov 7 '18 at 14:46
Quang HoangQuang Hoang
13.2k1233
13.2k1233
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
Very educational answer !
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Nov 7 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@QuangHoang Can you explain why $triangle ABX$ ~ $triangle CBY $? I can deduce from the second assertion which is very clear that $angle AXB=angle CBY $. I need to prove another congruence.
$endgroup$
– rafa
Nov 9 '18 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
$begingroup$
@rafa since $AB$ is a tangent line, $angle BAY = 1/2 arc{ACY} = pi - angle ACY$. So $angle XAB = angle ACY$. Similarly, $angle BXA = angle CAY$.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 9 '18 at 6:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My proof does not use similarity. So it's not just a copy of Quang's (excellent) idea.
Notice that:
$$ODbot AB,space EAbot AB implies DOparallel AE$$
$$OEbot AC,space DAbot AC implies DAparallel OE$$
Obviously, quadrilateral ADOE is a parallelogram (opposite sides are parallel) and because of that:
$$DX=DA=OEtag{1}$$
$$DO=AE=EYtag{2}$$
Introduce angles $delta=angle EAY$, $gamma=angle BAC$
$$angle AEY=180^circ-2delta$$
$$angle AEO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles ∠AEO and ∠BAC have perpendicular legs)
$$angle OEY=360^circ-angle AEY -angle AEO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{3}$$
On the other side opposite angles in parallelogram $angle DAE$ and $angle DOE$ are equal and $angle DOE$ is obtuse angle with perpendicular legs with respect to angle $angle BAC=gamma$:
$$angle DAE=angle DOE=180^circ-gamma$$
$$angle DAX=180^circ-angle DAE-angle EAY=gamma-delta$$
$$angle DXA=angle DAX=gamma-delta$$
$$angle XDA=180^circ-angle DAX-angle DXA=180^circ-2gamma+2delta$$
$$angle ADO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles $angle ADO$ and $angle BAC$ have perpendicular legs)
Finally:
$$angle XDO=angle XDA+angle ADO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{4}$$
From (3) and (4):
$$angle XDO=angle OEYtag{5}$$
Because of (1), (2) and (5) triangles $triangle XDO$ and $triangle OEY$ are congruent by SAS so it must be that $OX=OY$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My proof does not use similarity. So it's not just a copy of Quang's (excellent) idea.
Notice that:
$$ODbot AB,space EAbot AB implies DOparallel AE$$
$$OEbot AC,space DAbot AC implies DAparallel OE$$
Obviously, quadrilateral ADOE is a parallelogram (opposite sides are parallel) and because of that:
$$DX=DA=OEtag{1}$$
$$DO=AE=EYtag{2}$$
Introduce angles $delta=angle EAY$, $gamma=angle BAC$
$$angle AEY=180^circ-2delta$$
$$angle AEO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles ∠AEO and ∠BAC have perpendicular legs)
$$angle OEY=360^circ-angle AEY -angle AEO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{3}$$
On the other side opposite angles in parallelogram $angle DAE$ and $angle DOE$ are equal and $angle DOE$ is obtuse angle with perpendicular legs with respect to angle $angle BAC=gamma$:
$$angle DAE=angle DOE=180^circ-gamma$$
$$angle DAX=180^circ-angle DAE-angle EAY=gamma-delta$$
$$angle DXA=angle DAX=gamma-delta$$
$$angle XDA=180^circ-angle DAX-angle DXA=180^circ-2gamma+2delta$$
$$angle ADO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles $angle ADO$ and $angle BAC$ have perpendicular legs)
Finally:
$$angle XDO=angle XDA+angle ADO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{4}$$
From (3) and (4):
$$angle XDO=angle OEYtag{5}$$
Because of (1), (2) and (5) triangles $triangle XDO$ and $triangle OEY$ are congruent by SAS so it must be that $OX=OY$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My proof does not use similarity. So it's not just a copy of Quang's (excellent) idea.
Notice that:
$$ODbot AB,space EAbot AB implies DOparallel AE$$
$$OEbot AC,space DAbot AC implies DAparallel OE$$
Obviously, quadrilateral ADOE is a parallelogram (opposite sides are parallel) and because of that:
$$DX=DA=OEtag{1}$$
$$DO=AE=EYtag{2}$$
Introduce angles $delta=angle EAY$, $gamma=angle BAC$
$$angle AEY=180^circ-2delta$$
$$angle AEO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles ∠AEO and ∠BAC have perpendicular legs)
$$angle OEY=360^circ-angle AEY -angle AEO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{3}$$
On the other side opposite angles in parallelogram $angle DAE$ and $angle DOE$ are equal and $angle DOE$ is obtuse angle with perpendicular legs with respect to angle $angle BAC=gamma$:
$$angle DAE=angle DOE=180^circ-gamma$$
$$angle DAX=180^circ-angle DAE-angle EAY=gamma-delta$$
$$angle DXA=angle DAX=gamma-delta$$
$$angle XDA=180^circ-angle DAX-angle DXA=180^circ-2gamma+2delta$$
$$angle ADO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles $angle ADO$ and $angle BAC$ have perpendicular legs)
Finally:
$$angle XDO=angle XDA+angle ADO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{4}$$
From (3) and (4):
$$angle XDO=angle OEYtag{5}$$
Because of (1), (2) and (5) triangles $triangle XDO$ and $triangle OEY$ are congruent by SAS so it must be that $OX=OY$.
$endgroup$
My proof does not use similarity. So it's not just a copy of Quang's (excellent) idea.
Notice that:
$$ODbot AB,space EAbot AB implies DOparallel AE$$
$$OEbot AC,space DAbot AC implies DAparallel OE$$
Obviously, quadrilateral ADOE is a parallelogram (opposite sides are parallel) and because of that:
$$DX=DA=OEtag{1}$$
$$DO=AE=EYtag{2}$$
Introduce angles $delta=angle EAY$, $gamma=angle BAC$
$$angle AEY=180^circ-2delta$$
$$angle AEO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles ∠AEO and ∠BAC have perpendicular legs)
$$angle OEY=360^circ-angle AEY -angle AEO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{3}$$
On the other side opposite angles in parallelogram $angle DAE$ and $angle DOE$ are equal and $angle DOE$ is obtuse angle with perpendicular legs with respect to angle $angle BAC=gamma$:
$$angle DAE=angle DOE=180^circ-gamma$$
$$angle DAX=180^circ-angle DAE-angle EAY=gamma-delta$$
$$angle DXA=angle DAX=gamma-delta$$
$$angle XDA=180^circ-angle DAX-angle DXA=180^circ-2gamma+2delta$$
$$angle ADO=gamma$$
(the last is true because angles $angle ADO$ and $angle BAC$ have perpendicular legs)
Finally:
$$angle XDO=angle XDA+angle ADO=180^circ+2delta-gammatag{4}$$
From (3) and (4):
$$angle XDO=angle OEYtag{5}$$
Because of (1), (2) and (5) triangles $triangle XDO$ and $triangle OEY$ are congruent by SAS so it must be that $OX=OY$.
edited Nov 7 '18 at 15:59
answered Nov 7 '18 at 15:53
OldboyOldboy
8,4521936
8,4521936
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2988570%2fshow-that-ox-oy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
If you already have a geogebra drawing, why don’t you include it in the post. It would be more helpful and appealing.
$endgroup$
– Quang Hoang
Nov 7 '18 at 14:25