About module decomposition












0












$begingroup$


I am reading p. 20 of Introduction to Commutative Algebra by Atiyah and Macdonald. There there is a module decomposition



$$
A=mathfrak{a}_1opluscdotsoplusmathfrak{a}_n
$$



of a commutative ring $A$. Then the last sentence on the page says "The identity element $e_i$ of $mathfrak{a}_i$ is an idempotent in $A$, and $mathfrak{a}_i=(e_i)$." But do ideals have identity elements?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, sometimes they have identity elements. Not always. The ideals which are direct summands of a commutative ring all have identities.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 31 '18 at 11:16


















0












$begingroup$


I am reading p. 20 of Introduction to Commutative Algebra by Atiyah and Macdonald. There there is a module decomposition



$$
A=mathfrak{a}_1opluscdotsoplusmathfrak{a}_n
$$



of a commutative ring $A$. Then the last sentence on the page says "The identity element $e_i$ of $mathfrak{a}_i$ is an idempotent in $A$, and $mathfrak{a}_i=(e_i)$." But do ideals have identity elements?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, sometimes they have identity elements. Not always. The ideals which are direct summands of a commutative ring all have identities.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 31 '18 at 11:16
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am reading p. 20 of Introduction to Commutative Algebra by Atiyah and Macdonald. There there is a module decomposition



$$
A=mathfrak{a}_1opluscdotsoplusmathfrak{a}_n
$$



of a commutative ring $A$. Then the last sentence on the page says "The identity element $e_i$ of $mathfrak{a}_i$ is an idempotent in $A$, and $mathfrak{a}_i=(e_i)$." But do ideals have identity elements?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am reading p. 20 of Introduction to Commutative Algebra by Atiyah and Macdonald. There there is a module decomposition



$$
A=mathfrak{a}_1opluscdotsoplusmathfrak{a}_n
$$



of a commutative ring $A$. Then the last sentence on the page says "The identity element $e_i$ of $mathfrak{a}_i$ is an idempotent in $A$, and $mathfrak{a}_i=(e_i)$." But do ideals have identity elements?







commutative-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 15:17









user26857

39.3k124183




39.3k124183










asked Dec 31 '18 at 10:15









saisai

1376




1376








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, sometimes they have identity elements. Not always. The ideals which are direct summands of a commutative ring all have identities.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 31 '18 at 11:16
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, sometimes they have identity elements. Not always. The ideals which are direct summands of a commutative ring all have identities.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 31 '18 at 11:16










1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, sometimes they have identity elements. Not always. The ideals which are direct summands of a commutative ring all have identities.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 31 '18 at 11:16






$begingroup$
Yes, sometimes they have identity elements. Not always. The ideals which are direct summands of a commutative ring all have identities.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 31 '18 at 11:16












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

More context is important here. From the beginning of the paragraph, $A = prod A_i$ is a product of rings, and the ideals $mathfrak a_i$ are the image of the non-unit preserving maps $A_i to A$ sending $a_i mapsto (0,0,ldots, 0,a_i,0,ldots,0,0)$. This map identifies $mathfrak a_i simeq A_i$ as sets, so $e_i$ just means the element corresponding to the identity of $A_i$.



No ideals do not have identity elements, generally speaking they are non-unital rings. Even if they do have a unit, they are not considered subrings of the ring they are an ideal for (because they have a different unit).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    You forgot the sentence before that quote:




    Each $mathfrak a_i$ is a ring (isomorphic to $A/mathfrak b_i$).




    (where $mathfrak b_i = bigoplus_{j ne i} mathfrak a_j$)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057571%2fabout-module-decomposition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      More context is important here. From the beginning of the paragraph, $A = prod A_i$ is a product of rings, and the ideals $mathfrak a_i$ are the image of the non-unit preserving maps $A_i to A$ sending $a_i mapsto (0,0,ldots, 0,a_i,0,ldots,0,0)$. This map identifies $mathfrak a_i simeq A_i$ as sets, so $e_i$ just means the element corresponding to the identity of $A_i$.



      No ideals do not have identity elements, generally speaking they are non-unital rings. Even if they do have a unit, they are not considered subrings of the ring they are an ideal for (because they have a different unit).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        More context is important here. From the beginning of the paragraph, $A = prod A_i$ is a product of rings, and the ideals $mathfrak a_i$ are the image of the non-unit preserving maps $A_i to A$ sending $a_i mapsto (0,0,ldots, 0,a_i,0,ldots,0,0)$. This map identifies $mathfrak a_i simeq A_i$ as sets, so $e_i$ just means the element corresponding to the identity of $A_i$.



        No ideals do not have identity elements, generally speaking they are non-unital rings. Even if they do have a unit, they are not considered subrings of the ring they are an ideal for (because they have a different unit).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          More context is important here. From the beginning of the paragraph, $A = prod A_i$ is a product of rings, and the ideals $mathfrak a_i$ are the image of the non-unit preserving maps $A_i to A$ sending $a_i mapsto (0,0,ldots, 0,a_i,0,ldots,0,0)$. This map identifies $mathfrak a_i simeq A_i$ as sets, so $e_i$ just means the element corresponding to the identity of $A_i$.



          No ideals do not have identity elements, generally speaking they are non-unital rings. Even if they do have a unit, they are not considered subrings of the ring they are an ideal for (because they have a different unit).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          More context is important here. From the beginning of the paragraph, $A = prod A_i$ is a product of rings, and the ideals $mathfrak a_i$ are the image of the non-unit preserving maps $A_i to A$ sending $a_i mapsto (0,0,ldots, 0,a_i,0,ldots,0,0)$. This map identifies $mathfrak a_i simeq A_i$ as sets, so $e_i$ just means the element corresponding to the identity of $A_i$.



          No ideals do not have identity elements, generally speaking they are non-unital rings. Even if they do have a unit, they are not considered subrings of the ring they are an ideal for (because they have a different unit).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 31 '18 at 10:37









          BenBen

          4,178617




          4,178617























              0












              $begingroup$

              You forgot the sentence before that quote:




              Each $mathfrak a_i$ is a ring (isomorphic to $A/mathfrak b_i$).




              (where $mathfrak b_i = bigoplus_{j ne i} mathfrak a_j$)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                You forgot the sentence before that quote:




                Each $mathfrak a_i$ is a ring (isomorphic to $A/mathfrak b_i$).




                (where $mathfrak b_i = bigoplus_{j ne i} mathfrak a_j$)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  You forgot the sentence before that quote:




                  Each $mathfrak a_i$ is a ring (isomorphic to $A/mathfrak b_i$).




                  (where $mathfrak b_i = bigoplus_{j ne i} mathfrak a_j$)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You forgot the sentence before that quote:




                  Each $mathfrak a_i$ is a ring (isomorphic to $A/mathfrak b_i$).




                  (where $mathfrak b_i = bigoplus_{j ne i} mathfrak a_j$)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 31 '18 at 10:28









                  Kenny LauKenny Lau

                  19.9k2160




                  19.9k2160






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057571%2fabout-module-decomposition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna