Uniform convergence of power sequence












1












$begingroup$


I'd like to prove that the power sequence



$f_n(x) = x^n$



doesn't converges uniformly on $[0,1]$, but it does on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$.



My textbook states that a sequence of functions converges uniformly to $f(x)$ if



$ forall , epsilon > 0 ,, exists , overline{n}_{epsilon}: forall x in A quad |f_n(x) - f(x)| < epsilon$



So I found that $f_n(x)$ converges pointwise to
$f(a,b) =
begin{cases}
text{$0 leq x < 1 implies 0$}\
text{$x = 1 ,,,, ,,,,,,implies 1$}
end{cases}
$



So I tried to apply the definition of uniform convergence, but I can't understand how could I find an $epsilon > 0: forall , overline{n}, ,,exists , x in [0,1], ,,, exists , n geq overline{n}: |f_n(x) - f(x)| geq epsilon$



Did I misunderstand something about the definition? Thank you in advance






real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series functions uniform-convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can I construct that sequence?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:11










  • $begingroup$
    $f_n(1-1/2) = (1/2)^n$, $,, f(1-1/2) = 0$. But $(1/2)^2 < 1/2$
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:18












  • $begingroup$
    I take $x_n=1-1/n$, not $1-1/2$. You have $f_n(1-1/n)=(1-1/n)^nto 1/e$ and $f_n(1-1/n)geq frac{1}{4}$ for all $n$ (so take $varepsilon =1/4$ instead of $1/2$).
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:28












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, so $x_n to 1/e$ does the trick. Is it ok to take a value of $x$ for $f_n(x)$ that depends on $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your question : Is it ok to take a value of x for fn(x) that depends on n? Also, it's not correct that $x_nto 1/e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:39


















1












$begingroup$


I'd like to prove that the power sequence



$f_n(x) = x^n$



doesn't converges uniformly on $[0,1]$, but it does on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$.



My textbook states that a sequence of functions converges uniformly to $f(x)$ if



$ forall , epsilon > 0 ,, exists , overline{n}_{epsilon}: forall x in A quad |f_n(x) - f(x)| < epsilon$



So I found that $f_n(x)$ converges pointwise to
$f(a,b) =
begin{cases}
text{$0 leq x < 1 implies 0$}\
text{$x = 1 ,,,, ,,,,,,implies 1$}
end{cases}
$



So I tried to apply the definition of uniform convergence, but I can't understand how could I find an $epsilon > 0: forall , overline{n}, ,,exists , x in [0,1], ,,, exists , n geq overline{n}: |f_n(x) - f(x)| geq epsilon$



Did I misunderstand something about the definition? Thank you in advance






real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series functions uniform-convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can I construct that sequence?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:11










  • $begingroup$
    $f_n(1-1/2) = (1/2)^n$, $,, f(1-1/2) = 0$. But $(1/2)^2 < 1/2$
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:18












  • $begingroup$
    I take $x_n=1-1/n$, not $1-1/2$. You have $f_n(1-1/n)=(1-1/n)^nto 1/e$ and $f_n(1-1/n)geq frac{1}{4}$ for all $n$ (so take $varepsilon =1/4$ instead of $1/2$).
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:28












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, so $x_n to 1/e$ does the trick. Is it ok to take a value of $x$ for $f_n(x)$ that depends on $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your question : Is it ok to take a value of x for fn(x) that depends on n? Also, it's not correct that $x_nto 1/e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:39
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'd like to prove that the power sequence



$f_n(x) = x^n$



doesn't converges uniformly on $[0,1]$, but it does on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$.



My textbook states that a sequence of functions converges uniformly to $f(x)$ if



$ forall , epsilon > 0 ,, exists , overline{n}_{epsilon}: forall x in A quad |f_n(x) - f(x)| < epsilon$



So I found that $f_n(x)$ converges pointwise to
$f(a,b) =
begin{cases}
text{$0 leq x < 1 implies 0$}\
text{$x = 1 ,,,, ,,,,,,implies 1$}
end{cases}
$



So I tried to apply the definition of uniform convergence, but I can't understand how could I find an $epsilon > 0: forall , overline{n}, ,,exists , x in [0,1], ,,, exists , n geq overline{n}: |f_n(x) - f(x)| geq epsilon$



Did I misunderstand something about the definition? Thank you in advance






real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series functions uniform-convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'd like to prove that the power sequence



$f_n(x) = x^n$



doesn't converges uniformly on $[0,1]$, but it does on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$.



My textbook states that a sequence of functions converges uniformly to $f(x)$ if



$ forall , epsilon > 0 ,, exists , overline{n}_{epsilon}: forall x in A quad |f_n(x) - f(x)| < epsilon$



So I found that $f_n(x)$ converges pointwise to
$f(a,b) =
begin{cases}
text{$0 leq x < 1 implies 0$}\
text{$x = 1 ,,,, ,,,,,,implies 1$}
end{cases}
$



So I tried to apply the definition of uniform convergence, but I can't understand how could I find an $epsilon > 0: forall , overline{n}, ,,exists , x in [0,1], ,,, exists , n geq overline{n}: |f_n(x) - f(x)| geq epsilon$



Did I misunderstand something about the definition? Thank you in advance






real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series functions uniform-convergence




real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series functions uniform-convergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 13:44







Francesco Andreuzzi

















asked Dec 31 '18 at 11:55









Francesco AndreuzziFrancesco Andreuzzi

63




63












  • $begingroup$
    How can I construct that sequence?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:11










  • $begingroup$
    $f_n(1-1/2) = (1/2)^n$, $,, f(1-1/2) = 0$. But $(1/2)^2 < 1/2$
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:18












  • $begingroup$
    I take $x_n=1-1/n$, not $1-1/2$. You have $f_n(1-1/n)=(1-1/n)^nto 1/e$ and $f_n(1-1/n)geq frac{1}{4}$ for all $n$ (so take $varepsilon =1/4$ instead of $1/2$).
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:28












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, so $x_n to 1/e$ does the trick. Is it ok to take a value of $x$ for $f_n(x)$ that depends on $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your question : Is it ok to take a value of x for fn(x) that depends on n? Also, it's not correct that $x_nto 1/e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:39




















  • $begingroup$
    How can I construct that sequence?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:11










  • $begingroup$
    $f_n(1-1/2) = (1/2)^n$, $,, f(1-1/2) = 0$. But $(1/2)^2 < 1/2$
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:18












  • $begingroup$
    I take $x_n=1-1/n$, not $1-1/2$. You have $f_n(1-1/n)=(1-1/n)^nto 1/e$ and $f_n(1-1/n)geq frac{1}{4}$ for all $n$ (so take $varepsilon =1/4$ instead of $1/2$).
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:28












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, so $x_n to 1/e$ does the trick. Is it ok to take a value of $x$ for $f_n(x)$ that depends on $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your question : Is it ok to take a value of x for fn(x) that depends on n? Also, it's not correct that $x_nto 1/e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:39


















$begingroup$
How can I construct that sequence?
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:11




$begingroup$
How can I construct that sequence?
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:11












$begingroup$
$f_n(1-1/2) = (1/2)^n$, $,, f(1-1/2) = 0$. But $(1/2)^2 < 1/2$
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:18






$begingroup$
$f_n(1-1/2) = (1/2)^n$, $,, f(1-1/2) = 0$. But $(1/2)^2 < 1/2$
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:18














$begingroup$
I take $x_n=1-1/n$, not $1-1/2$. You have $f_n(1-1/n)=(1-1/n)^nto 1/e$ and $f_n(1-1/n)geq frac{1}{4}$ for all $n$ (so take $varepsilon =1/4$ instead of $1/2$).
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 31 '18 at 12:28






$begingroup$
I take $x_n=1-1/n$, not $1-1/2$. You have $f_n(1-1/n)=(1-1/n)^nto 1/e$ and $f_n(1-1/n)geq frac{1}{4}$ for all $n$ (so take $varepsilon =1/4$ instead of $1/2$).
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 31 '18 at 12:28














$begingroup$
Okay, so $x_n to 1/e$ does the trick. Is it ok to take a value of $x$ for $f_n(x)$ that depends on $n$?
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:38




$begingroup$
Okay, so $x_n to 1/e$ does the trick. Is it ok to take a value of $x$ for $f_n(x)$ that depends on $n$?
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:38












$begingroup$
I don't understand your question : Is it ok to take a value of x for fn(x) that depends on n? Also, it's not correct that $x_nto 1/e$.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 31 '18 at 12:39






$begingroup$
I don't understand your question : Is it ok to take a value of x for fn(x) that depends on n? Also, it's not correct that $x_nto 1/e$.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 31 '18 at 12:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

In the way that I think is more constructive to think about it, uniform convergence of $f_n$ to $f$ on $A$ is equivalent to $underset{xin A}{sup} vert f_n(x)-f(x)vert overset{nrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 0$.
So if for all $n$ there exists $x_nin A$ such that:



$vert f_n(x_n)-f(x_n)vertequiv c>0$



then you would show that there is no uniform to $f$. You have to consider just one $f$, since uniform convergence also implies point-wise convergence.



You could have also gone another route. If a sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly to $f$, then $f$ is a continuous function, which you can see that $f$ is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:45










  • $begingroup$
    For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:52












  • $begingroup$
    But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:09













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057637%2funiform-convergence-of-power-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

In the way that I think is more constructive to think about it, uniform convergence of $f_n$ to $f$ on $A$ is equivalent to $underset{xin A}{sup} vert f_n(x)-f(x)vert overset{nrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 0$.
So if for all $n$ there exists $x_nin A$ such that:



$vert f_n(x_n)-f(x_n)vertequiv c>0$



then you would show that there is no uniform to $f$. You have to consider just one $f$, since uniform convergence also implies point-wise convergence.



You could have also gone another route. If a sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly to $f$, then $f$ is a continuous function, which you can see that $f$ is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:45










  • $begingroup$
    For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:52












  • $begingroup$
    But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:09


















1












$begingroup$

In the way that I think is more constructive to think about it, uniform convergence of $f_n$ to $f$ on $A$ is equivalent to $underset{xin A}{sup} vert f_n(x)-f(x)vert overset{nrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 0$.
So if for all $n$ there exists $x_nin A$ such that:



$vert f_n(x_n)-f(x_n)vertequiv c>0$



then you would show that there is no uniform to $f$. You have to consider just one $f$, since uniform convergence also implies point-wise convergence.



You could have also gone another route. If a sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly to $f$, then $f$ is a continuous function, which you can see that $f$ is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:45










  • $begingroup$
    For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:52












  • $begingroup$
    But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:09
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

In the way that I think is more constructive to think about it, uniform convergence of $f_n$ to $f$ on $A$ is equivalent to $underset{xin A}{sup} vert f_n(x)-f(x)vert overset{nrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 0$.
So if for all $n$ there exists $x_nin A$ such that:



$vert f_n(x_n)-f(x_n)vertequiv c>0$



then you would show that there is no uniform to $f$. You have to consider just one $f$, since uniform convergence also implies point-wise convergence.



You could have also gone another route. If a sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly to $f$, then $f$ is a continuous function, which you can see that $f$ is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



In the way that I think is more constructive to think about it, uniform convergence of $f_n$ to $f$ on $A$ is equivalent to $underset{xin A}{sup} vert f_n(x)-f(x)vert overset{nrightarrow infty}{rightarrow} 0$.
So if for all $n$ there exists $x_nin A$ such that:



$vert f_n(x_n)-f(x_n)vertequiv c>0$



then you would show that there is no uniform to $f$. You have to consider just one $f$, since uniform convergence also implies point-wise convergence.



You could have also gone another route. If a sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly to $f$, then $f$ is a continuous function, which you can see that $f$ is not.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 31 '18 at 12:54

























answered Dec 31 '18 at 12:36









Keen-ameteurKeen-ameteur

1,477316




1,477316












  • $begingroup$
    Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:45










  • $begingroup$
    For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:52












  • $begingroup$
    But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:09




















  • $begingroup$
    Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:45










  • $begingroup$
    For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 12:52












  • $begingroup$
    But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
    $endgroup$
    – Francesco Andreuzzi
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:09


















$begingroup$
Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:45




$begingroup$
Could you please explain which $x_n$ should I consider?
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 12:45












$begingroup$
For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Dec 31 '18 at 12:52






$begingroup$
For example if you want to show for $c=frac{3}{4}$, you would want that $x_n^n-0=frac{3}{4}$. So for example $x_n:=Big( frac{3}{4} Big)^{frac{1}{n}} $ would work.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Dec 31 '18 at 12:52














$begingroup$
But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 13:01




$begingroup$
But I know that $f_n(x) = x^n$ converges on $[0,a]$ if $a < 1$. Your proof proves also that my sequence doesn't converge uniformly on that set
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 13:01












$begingroup$
It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Dec 31 '18 at 13:04






$begingroup$
It won't since for any $1>a>0$, $x_n$ would eventually be larger than $a$, and thus not be relevant to the interval $[0,a]$. Furthermore for all $c>0$, choosing $x_n =sqrt[n]{c}$ would mean that $x_n>a$ eventually.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Dec 31 '18 at 13:04














$begingroup$
Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 13:09






$begingroup$
Okay, it makes sense. Thank you very much. Could you please check my last comment below my question, and tell me what you think? For instance, $lim_{n to infty} (3/4)^{1/n} = 1$, but this conflicts with the pointwise limit that I definied in my question
$endgroup$
– Francesco Andreuzzi
Dec 31 '18 at 13:09




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057637%2funiform-convergence-of-power-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Cabo Verde

Image
  Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º)
Read more

Gyllenstierna

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
Read more

Karlovacs län

Image
.mw-parser-output table.ambox{margin:0 10%;border-collapse:collapse;background:#fbfbfb;border:1px solid #aaa;border-left:10px solid #608ec2}.mw-parser-output table.ambox th.ambox-text,.mw-parser-output table.ambox td.ambox-text{padding:.25em .5em;width:100%}.mw-parser-output table.ambox td.ambox-image{padding:2px 0 2px .5em;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle}.mw-parser-output table.ambox td.ambox-imageright{padding:2px 4px 2px 0;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle}.mw-parser-output table.ambox-notice{border-left:10px solid #608ec2}.mw-parser-output table.ambox-delete,.mw-parser-output table.ambox-serious{border-left:10px solid #b22222}.mw-parser-output table.ambox-content{border-left:10px solid #f28500}.mw-parser-output table.ambox-style{border-left:10px solid #f4c430}.mw-parser-output table.ambox-merge{border-left:10px solid #9932cc}.mw-parser-output table.ambox-protection{border-left:10px solid #bba}.mw-parser-output .ambox+.ambox,.mw-parser-output .topbox+.ambox,.mw-pars
Read more