Generalized Distributive Law












0












$begingroup$


This is problem 3.11, p.29, Introduction to Set Theory, Hrbacek and Jech.



$$
big( bigcap_{a in A} F_a big) cup
big( bigcap_{b in B} G_b big)
= bigcap_{(a,b) in A times B} (F_a cup G_b).
$$



It is my attempt.



$
begin{equation}
x in (LHS) \
Leftrightarrow x in bigcap_{a in A} F_a ~~ or ~~ x in bigcap_{b in B} G_b \
Leftrightarrow (x in F_a ~~for ~~all~~ain A)~~or~~
(xin G_b~~ for~~all~~bin B).
end{equation}
$



And,



$
begin{equation}
xin(RHS) \
Leftrightarrow x in F_a cup G_b~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B \
Leftrightarrow (xin F_a~~or ~~ x in G_b)
~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B.
end{equation}
$



I want to change the position of phrases in each last sentences, but I'm not sure doing it preserves if and only if condition.



Please help my problem.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    This is problem 3.11, p.29, Introduction to Set Theory, Hrbacek and Jech.



    $$
    big( bigcap_{a in A} F_a big) cup
    big( bigcap_{b in B} G_b big)
    = bigcap_{(a,b) in A times B} (F_a cup G_b).
    $$



    It is my attempt.



    $
    begin{equation}
    x in (LHS) \
    Leftrightarrow x in bigcap_{a in A} F_a ~~ or ~~ x in bigcap_{b in B} G_b \
    Leftrightarrow (x in F_a ~~for ~~all~~ain A)~~or~~
    (xin G_b~~ for~~all~~bin B).
    end{equation}
    $



    And,



    $
    begin{equation}
    xin(RHS) \
    Leftrightarrow x in F_a cup G_b~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B \
    Leftrightarrow (xin F_a~~or ~~ x in G_b)
    ~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B.
    end{equation}
    $



    I want to change the position of phrases in each last sentences, but I'm not sure doing it preserves if and only if condition.



    Please help my problem.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      This is problem 3.11, p.29, Introduction to Set Theory, Hrbacek and Jech.



      $$
      big( bigcap_{a in A} F_a big) cup
      big( bigcap_{b in B} G_b big)
      = bigcap_{(a,b) in A times B} (F_a cup G_b).
      $$



      It is my attempt.



      $
      begin{equation}
      x in (LHS) \
      Leftrightarrow x in bigcap_{a in A} F_a ~~ or ~~ x in bigcap_{b in B} G_b \
      Leftrightarrow (x in F_a ~~for ~~all~~ain A)~~or~~
      (xin G_b~~ for~~all~~bin B).
      end{equation}
      $



      And,



      $
      begin{equation}
      xin(RHS) \
      Leftrightarrow x in F_a cup G_b~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B \
      Leftrightarrow (xin F_a~~or ~~ x in G_b)
      ~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B.
      end{equation}
      $



      I want to change the position of phrases in each last sentences, but I'm not sure doing it preserves if and only if condition.



      Please help my problem.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This is problem 3.11, p.29, Introduction to Set Theory, Hrbacek and Jech.



      $$
      big( bigcap_{a in A} F_a big) cup
      big( bigcap_{b in B} G_b big)
      = bigcap_{(a,b) in A times B} (F_a cup G_b).
      $$



      It is my attempt.



      $
      begin{equation}
      x in (LHS) \
      Leftrightarrow x in bigcap_{a in A} F_a ~~ or ~~ x in bigcap_{b in B} G_b \
      Leftrightarrow (x in F_a ~~for ~~all~~ain A)~~or~~
      (xin G_b~~ for~~all~~bin B).
      end{equation}
      $



      And,



      $
      begin{equation}
      xin(RHS) \
      Leftrightarrow x in F_a cup G_b~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B \
      Leftrightarrow (xin F_a~~or ~~ x in G_b)
      ~~for ~~all~~(a,b) in A times B.
      end{equation}
      $



      I want to change the position of phrases in each last sentences, but I'm not sure doing it preserves if and only if condition.



      Please help my problem.







      set-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 31 '18 at 11:36









      Doyun NamDoyun Nam

      67119




      67119






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          It is more handsome to do the second part by proving that: $$xnotintext{ LHS }implies xnotintext{ RHS }$$





          Doing it your way the following statements are equivalent:




          • $forall ain A;forall bin B;[xin F_avee xin G_b]$

          • $forall ain A;[xin F_aveeforall bin B;[xin G_b]]$

          • $forall bin B;[xin G_b]veeforall ain A;[xin F_a]$


          This on base of the rule: $$forall x;[ Qvee P(x)]iff Qveeforall x;P(x)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
            $endgroup$
            – Doyun Nam
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:06








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
            $endgroup$
            – drhab
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:09











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057623%2fgeneralized-distributive-law%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          It is more handsome to do the second part by proving that: $$xnotintext{ LHS }implies xnotintext{ RHS }$$





          Doing it your way the following statements are equivalent:




          • $forall ain A;forall bin B;[xin F_avee xin G_b]$

          • $forall ain A;[xin F_aveeforall bin B;[xin G_b]]$

          • $forall bin B;[xin G_b]veeforall ain A;[xin F_a]$


          This on base of the rule: $$forall x;[ Qvee P(x)]iff Qveeforall x;P(x)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
            $endgroup$
            – Doyun Nam
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:06








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
            $endgroup$
            – drhab
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:09
















          1












          $begingroup$

          It is more handsome to do the second part by proving that: $$xnotintext{ LHS }implies xnotintext{ RHS }$$





          Doing it your way the following statements are equivalent:




          • $forall ain A;forall bin B;[xin F_avee xin G_b]$

          • $forall ain A;[xin F_aveeforall bin B;[xin G_b]]$

          • $forall bin B;[xin G_b]veeforall ain A;[xin F_a]$


          This on base of the rule: $$forall x;[ Qvee P(x)]iff Qveeforall x;P(x)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
            $endgroup$
            – Doyun Nam
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:06








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
            $endgroup$
            – drhab
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:09














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          It is more handsome to do the second part by proving that: $$xnotintext{ LHS }implies xnotintext{ RHS }$$





          Doing it your way the following statements are equivalent:




          • $forall ain A;forall bin B;[xin F_avee xin G_b]$

          • $forall ain A;[xin F_aveeforall bin B;[xin G_b]]$

          • $forall bin B;[xin G_b]veeforall ain A;[xin F_a]$


          This on base of the rule: $$forall x;[ Qvee P(x)]iff Qveeforall x;P(x)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          It is more handsome to do the second part by proving that: $$xnotintext{ LHS }implies xnotintext{ RHS }$$





          Doing it your way the following statements are equivalent:




          • $forall ain A;forall bin B;[xin F_avee xin G_b]$

          • $forall ain A;[xin F_aveeforall bin B;[xin G_b]]$

          • $forall bin B;[xin G_b]veeforall ain A;[xin F_a]$


          This on base of the rule: $$forall x;[ Qvee P(x)]iff Qveeforall x;P(x)$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 31 '18 at 11:55









          drhabdrhab

          102k545136




          102k545136












          • $begingroup$
            I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
            $endgroup$
            – Doyun Nam
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:06








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
            $endgroup$
            – drhab
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:09


















          • $begingroup$
            I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
            $endgroup$
            – Doyun Nam
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:06








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
            $endgroup$
            – drhab
            Dec 31 '18 at 12:09
















          $begingroup$
          I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
          $endgroup$
          – Doyun Nam
          Dec 31 '18 at 12:06






          $begingroup$
          I understand your explanation, thank you! When I studied this book, I met some logical confusion. Can you recommend a basic mathematical logic textbook to me for studying undergraduate-level set theory?
          $endgroup$
          – Doyun Nam
          Dec 31 '18 at 12:06






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
          $endgroup$
          – drhab
          Dec 31 '18 at 12:09




          $begingroup$
          Glad to help. Sorry, but I am not familiar with any mathematical textbook on logic:-(.
          $endgroup$
          – drhab
          Dec 31 '18 at 12:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057623%2fgeneralized-distributive-law%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna