For each $ a $ with $ |a| > 1 $, $f^{-1}(a)$ contains exactly one point
$begingroup$
Let $ G = { z in mathbb{C} : |z-2| < 1} $ and let $ f $ be
analytic in $ overline{G} $ except for one simple pole $ z_0 $
inside. Suppose that $ |f(z)| = 1$ for all $ z in partial G $. Show
that for all $ a $ with $ |a| > 1 $, $ f^{-1}(a) $ contains exactly
one point.
So $f(z) $ can be written as $ sum a_n (z-2)^n + frac{b}{z - z_0} $, but I don't know how to use the fact that $ |f(z)| = 1 $ for all $ z in partial G $. How to solve this question?
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $ G = { z in mathbb{C} : |z-2| < 1} $ and let $ f $ be
analytic in $ overline{G} $ except for one simple pole $ z_0 $
inside. Suppose that $ |f(z)| = 1$ for all $ z in partial G $. Show
that for all $ a $ with $ |a| > 1 $, $ f^{-1}(a) $ contains exactly
one point.
So $f(z) $ can be written as $ sum a_n (z-2)^n + frac{b}{z - z_0} $, but I don't know how to use the fact that $ |f(z)| = 1 $ for all $ z in partial G $. How to solve this question?
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $ G = { z in mathbb{C} : |z-2| < 1} $ and let $ f $ be
analytic in $ overline{G} $ except for one simple pole $ z_0 $
inside. Suppose that $ |f(z)| = 1$ for all $ z in partial G $. Show
that for all $ a $ with $ |a| > 1 $, $ f^{-1}(a) $ contains exactly
one point.
So $f(z) $ can be written as $ sum a_n (z-2)^n + frac{b}{z - z_0} $, but I don't know how to use the fact that $ |f(z)| = 1 $ for all $ z in partial G $. How to solve this question?
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
Let $ G = { z in mathbb{C} : |z-2| < 1} $ and let $ f $ be
analytic in $ overline{G} $ except for one simple pole $ z_0 $
inside. Suppose that $ |f(z)| = 1$ for all $ z in partial G $. Show
that for all $ a $ with $ |a| > 1 $, $ f^{-1}(a) $ contains exactly
one point.
So $f(z) $ can be written as $ sum a_n (z-2)^n + frac{b}{z - z_0} $, but I don't know how to use the fact that $ |f(z)| = 1 $ for all $ z in partial G $. How to solve this question?
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
asked Jan 7 at 10:01
calmcalm
1387
1387
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since this is complex analysis, $ |f(z)| = 1 $ on $ partial G $ should be interpreted in one of two different ways :
For the maximum modulus principle, however this result doesn't help at all with finding only one preimage of $ a $.
For the indices of points relative to some curves : here, we get by setting the usual curve $ gamma : t mapsto e^{2i pi t} + 2 $ that $ n(f circ gamma, a) = 0 $ because $ operatorname{Im} f circ gamma subset D_c(0, 1)$ and $ a not in D_c(0, 1)$. Thus , we can use the argument principle :
$$ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = 2 i pi (sum n(gamma, text{zero of } f(z) - a) - sum n(gamma, text{pole of } f(z) - a))$$
and notice that $ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = n(fcirc gamma, a) = 0$. The result then follows.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064836%2ffor-each-a-with-a-1-f-1a-contains-exactly-one-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since this is complex analysis, $ |f(z)| = 1 $ on $ partial G $ should be interpreted in one of two different ways :
For the maximum modulus principle, however this result doesn't help at all with finding only one preimage of $ a $.
For the indices of points relative to some curves : here, we get by setting the usual curve $ gamma : t mapsto e^{2i pi t} + 2 $ that $ n(f circ gamma, a) = 0 $ because $ operatorname{Im} f circ gamma subset D_c(0, 1)$ and $ a not in D_c(0, 1)$. Thus , we can use the argument principle :
$$ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = 2 i pi (sum n(gamma, text{zero of } f(z) - a) - sum n(gamma, text{pole of } f(z) - a))$$
and notice that $ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = n(fcirc gamma, a) = 0$. The result then follows.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since this is complex analysis, $ |f(z)| = 1 $ on $ partial G $ should be interpreted in one of two different ways :
For the maximum modulus principle, however this result doesn't help at all with finding only one preimage of $ a $.
For the indices of points relative to some curves : here, we get by setting the usual curve $ gamma : t mapsto e^{2i pi t} + 2 $ that $ n(f circ gamma, a) = 0 $ because $ operatorname{Im} f circ gamma subset D_c(0, 1)$ and $ a not in D_c(0, 1)$. Thus , we can use the argument principle :
$$ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = 2 i pi (sum n(gamma, text{zero of } f(z) - a) - sum n(gamma, text{pole of } f(z) - a))$$
and notice that $ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = n(fcirc gamma, a) = 0$. The result then follows.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since this is complex analysis, $ |f(z)| = 1 $ on $ partial G $ should be interpreted in one of two different ways :
For the maximum modulus principle, however this result doesn't help at all with finding only one preimage of $ a $.
For the indices of points relative to some curves : here, we get by setting the usual curve $ gamma : t mapsto e^{2i pi t} + 2 $ that $ n(f circ gamma, a) = 0 $ because $ operatorname{Im} f circ gamma subset D_c(0, 1)$ and $ a not in D_c(0, 1)$. Thus , we can use the argument principle :
$$ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = 2 i pi (sum n(gamma, text{zero of } f(z) - a) - sum n(gamma, text{pole of } f(z) - a))$$
and notice that $ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = n(fcirc gamma, a) = 0$. The result then follows.
$endgroup$
Since this is complex analysis, $ |f(z)| = 1 $ on $ partial G $ should be interpreted in one of two different ways :
For the maximum modulus principle, however this result doesn't help at all with finding only one preimage of $ a $.
For the indices of points relative to some curves : here, we get by setting the usual curve $ gamma : t mapsto e^{2i pi t} + 2 $ that $ n(f circ gamma, a) = 0 $ because $ operatorname{Im} f circ gamma subset D_c(0, 1)$ and $ a not in D_c(0, 1)$. Thus , we can use the argument principle :
$$ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = 2 i pi (sum n(gamma, text{zero of } f(z) - a) - sum n(gamma, text{pole of } f(z) - a))$$
and notice that $ int_gamma frac{f'(z)}{f(z) - a}dz = n(fcirc gamma, a) = 0$. The result then follows.
edited Jan 7 at 13:51
answered Jan 7 at 10:53
FreeSaladFreeSalad
479211
479211
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
So for this problem, $ |f(z) | leq 1 $ on $ partial G $ is enough since the winding number is still $ 0 $ in this case, correct?
$endgroup$
– calm
Jan 14 at 2:24
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@lifeishard911 I do think that is the case.
$endgroup$
– FreeSalad
Jan 14 at 9:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064836%2ffor-each-a-with-a-1-f-1a-contains-exactly-one-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown