Advantages of normalization of varieties












2












$begingroup$


I am inexperienced in algebraic geometry, all I learned from this was reading some class notes and many questions clarified with the help of this platform. I'm reading a part of a book and I found some more doubts:



"Let $X subset mathbb{P}^n$ be an irreducible projective variety. Consider the Gauss map
$$
gamma: X_{reg}longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)
$$

that assigns to each point $p in X_{reg}$ the translate to the origin of the projectivized tangent hyperplane $mathbb{P}T_p(X_{reg}).$ Let $Gamma$ be the closure of the graph of $gamma$ in $X timesmathbb{G}(k,n)$. Let $widetilde {Gamma}$ be the normalization of $Gamma$. We have a natural morphism $alpha:widetilde {Gamma} longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)$ induced by
projection onto the second factor."



1) It is correct that $alpha(bigstar)=p_2 circ nu(bigstar)$, where $p_2$ is projection onto the second factor and $nu:widetilde{Gamma} longrightarrow
Gamma$
is regular map birational, given by normalization ???



2) What is the advantage of working with $alpha$ instead of directly $p_2$? What do you get by looking at $widetilde {Gamma}$ instead of $Gamma$???



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am inexperienced in algebraic geometry, all I learned from this was reading some class notes and many questions clarified with the help of this platform. I'm reading a part of a book and I found some more doubts:



    "Let $X subset mathbb{P}^n$ be an irreducible projective variety. Consider the Gauss map
    $$
    gamma: X_{reg}longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)
    $$

    that assigns to each point $p in X_{reg}$ the translate to the origin of the projectivized tangent hyperplane $mathbb{P}T_p(X_{reg}).$ Let $Gamma$ be the closure of the graph of $gamma$ in $X timesmathbb{G}(k,n)$. Let $widetilde {Gamma}$ be the normalization of $Gamma$. We have a natural morphism $alpha:widetilde {Gamma} longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)$ induced by
    projection onto the second factor."



    1) It is correct that $alpha(bigstar)=p_2 circ nu(bigstar)$, where $p_2$ is projection onto the second factor and $nu:widetilde{Gamma} longrightarrow
    Gamma$
    is regular map birational, given by normalization ???



    2) What is the advantage of working with $alpha$ instead of directly $p_2$? What do you get by looking at $widetilde {Gamma}$ instead of $Gamma$???



    Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am inexperienced in algebraic geometry, all I learned from this was reading some class notes and many questions clarified with the help of this platform. I'm reading a part of a book and I found some more doubts:



      "Let $X subset mathbb{P}^n$ be an irreducible projective variety. Consider the Gauss map
      $$
      gamma: X_{reg}longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)
      $$

      that assigns to each point $p in X_{reg}$ the translate to the origin of the projectivized tangent hyperplane $mathbb{P}T_p(X_{reg}).$ Let $Gamma$ be the closure of the graph of $gamma$ in $X timesmathbb{G}(k,n)$. Let $widetilde {Gamma}$ be the normalization of $Gamma$. We have a natural morphism $alpha:widetilde {Gamma} longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)$ induced by
      projection onto the second factor."



      1) It is correct that $alpha(bigstar)=p_2 circ nu(bigstar)$, where $p_2$ is projection onto the second factor and $nu:widetilde{Gamma} longrightarrow
      Gamma$
      is regular map birational, given by normalization ???



      2) What is the advantage of working with $alpha$ instead of directly $p_2$? What do you get by looking at $widetilde {Gamma}$ instead of $Gamma$???



      Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am inexperienced in algebraic geometry, all I learned from this was reading some class notes and many questions clarified with the help of this platform. I'm reading a part of a book and I found some more doubts:



      "Let $X subset mathbb{P}^n$ be an irreducible projective variety. Consider the Gauss map
      $$
      gamma: X_{reg}longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)
      $$

      that assigns to each point $p in X_{reg}$ the translate to the origin of the projectivized tangent hyperplane $mathbb{P}T_p(X_{reg}).$ Let $Gamma$ be the closure of the graph of $gamma$ in $X timesmathbb{G}(k,n)$. Let $widetilde {Gamma}$ be the normalization of $Gamma$. We have a natural morphism $alpha:widetilde {Gamma} longrightarrow mathbb{G}(k,n)$ induced by
      projection onto the second factor."



      1) It is correct that $alpha(bigstar)=p_2 circ nu(bigstar)$, where $p_2$ is projection onto the second factor and $nu:widetilde{Gamma} longrightarrow
      Gamma$
      is regular map birational, given by normalization ???



      2) What is the advantage of working with $alpha$ instead of directly $p_2$? What do you get by looking at $widetilde {Gamma}$ instead of $Gamma$???



      Thanks in advance.







      algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 14 at 1:02









      ManoelManoel

      942518




      942518






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072737%2fadvantages-of-normalization-of-varieties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072737%2fadvantages-of-normalization-of-varieties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna