Closed form for sum












0












$begingroup$


I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:00








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:39
















0












$begingroup$


I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:00








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:39














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.







sequences-and-series summation telescopic-series






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 16 '18 at 12:38









Oussama SarihOussama Sarih

47827




47827








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:00








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:39














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 16 '18 at 12:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:00








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:04












  • $begingroup$
    It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Oussama Sarih
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:39








4




4




$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49




$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49




1




1




$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54




$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54












$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00






$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00






2




2




$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04






$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04














$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39




$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.



My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.



This yields:
$$
S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
$$



since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.



Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.



Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042568%2fclosed-form-for-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.



    My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.



    This yields:
    $$
    S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
    $$



    since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.



    Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.



    Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.



      My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.



      This yields:
      $$
      S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
      $$



      since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.



      Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.



      Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.



        My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.



        This yields:
        $$
        S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
        $$



        since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.



        Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.



        Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.



        My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.



        This yields:
        $$
        S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
        $$



        since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.



        Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.



        Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:27









        Bill O'HaranBill O'Haran

        2,5431418




        2,5431418






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042568%2fclosed-form-for-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna