Closed form for sum
$begingroup$
I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.
sequences-and-series summation telescopic-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.
sequences-and-series summation telescopic-series
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00
2
$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.
sequences-and-series summation telescopic-series
$endgroup$
I wonder whether there is a closed form for this sum
$$ S_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^n dfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
The question asks to express the sum in terms of $n$ then to deduce the limit of $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$.
I tried to use the following sum as an auxiliary sum
$$T_n:=displaystylesum_{k=0}^ndfrac{5^k}{4^k+5^k}$$
noticing that $S_n + T_n = n+1$.
Any thoughts about this ? thanks.
sequences-and-series summation telescopic-series
sequences-and-series summation telescopic-series
asked Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
Oussama SarihOussama Sarih
47827
47827
4
$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00
2
$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00
2
$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39
4
4
$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49
$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49
1
1
$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00
2
2
$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39
$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.
My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.
This yields:
$$
S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
$$
since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.
Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.
Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042568%2fclosed-form-for-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.
My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.
This yields:
$$
S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
$$
since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.
Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.
Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.
My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.
This yields:
$$
S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
$$
since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.
Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.
Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.
My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.
This yields:
$$
S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
$$
since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.
Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.
Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.
$endgroup$
As hinted by SmileyCraft, I cannot think of any simple closed form to express $S_n$.
My best guess is to use Big $mathcal{O}$ notation. As you thought, $S_n = n+1 - T_n$ then write $T_n = sum_{k=0}^n u_k$ with $u_k = frac{1}{1+left(frac{4}{5}right)^k}underset{ktoinfty}{=}1 + mathcal{O}left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$. Now $left(frac{4}{5}right)^k$ is a positive real sequence thus sommable in Big $mathcal{O}$ notation.
This yields:
$$
S_n underset{nto infty}{=} n+1 - left[(n+1) + mathcal{O}(1) right] = mathcal{O}(1)
$$
since $sum_{k=0}^n left(frac{4}{5}right)^k underset{nto infty}{=} mathcal{O}(1)$.
Then $frac{S_n}{n+1} = mathcal{O}(frac{1}{n+1})$.
Note that it is very similar and perfectly equivalent to what SmileyCraft does but it does give you an expression of $S_n$ (though trivial) depending on $n$.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:27
Bill O'HaranBill O'Haran
2,5431418
2,5431418
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042568%2fclosed-form-for-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
I don't know how to express the sum in terms of $n$, but I am a little confused. Don't we have $lim_{ntoinfty}S_n=sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac{4^k}{4^k+5^k}leqsum_{k=0}^infty(frac45)^k=frac1{1-frac45}=5$ and hence $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{S_n}{n+1}=0$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
Also, Wolfram Alpha gives a closed form involving the $q$-digamma function, which I've never heared of, and I doubt you have. What makes you think there is a closed form of the sum?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 16 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Thanks, the first part of the question in a paper (which I doubt is wrong) asks to express $S_n$ in terms of $n$ before computing the limit of the quotient $dfrac{S_n}{n+1}$
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 13:00
2
$begingroup$
@OussamaSarih, can you link to the paper, or reproduce verbatim what it says about expressing $S_n$? Given that the first three $S_n$'s are $1/2$, $17/18$, and $985/738$, I'd be a little surprised to see any kind of simple closed formula. (Even well written papers make occasional mistakes.)
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 16 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
It's a homework sheet in french for highschool, I'll post a screenshot as soon as I get from one from the students who asked me to solve it.
$endgroup$
– Oussama Sarih
Dec 16 '18 at 15:39