Given a trapezoid with base $AD$ larger than side $CD$. The bisector of $angle D$ meets $AB$ at $K$. Prove...
$begingroup$
We have a trapezoid $ABCD$ with base $AD$ larger than side $CD$. The bisector of $angle D$ intersects side $AB$ at point $K$. Prove that $AK>KB$.
All that I have tried was to make such drawing in GeoGebra, which obviously showed me that $AK>KB$, even if I extend $AD$ very, very long. I think the solution should go somehow through similar triangles, but I honestly have no idea how. I would really appreciate any help you provide. To mention more, I seriously don't need the entire solution. Even a little hint would be very helpful for me, since I don't really know where to start.
EDIT: key mistake was made in the previous problem: it's not $AD$ that's larger than $BC$, but $AD$ is larger than side $CD$.
geometry euclidean-geometry quadrilateral
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have a trapezoid $ABCD$ with base $AD$ larger than side $CD$. The bisector of $angle D$ intersects side $AB$ at point $K$. Prove that $AK>KB$.
All that I have tried was to make such drawing in GeoGebra, which obviously showed me that $AK>KB$, even if I extend $AD$ very, very long. I think the solution should go somehow through similar triangles, but I honestly have no idea how. I would really appreciate any help you provide. To mention more, I seriously don't need the entire solution. Even a little hint would be very helpful for me, since I don't really know where to start.
EDIT: key mistake was made in the previous problem: it's not $AD$ that's larger than $BC$, but $AD$ is larger than side $CD$.
geometry euclidean-geometry quadrilateral
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have a trapezoid $ABCD$ with base $AD$ larger than side $CD$. The bisector of $angle D$ intersects side $AB$ at point $K$. Prove that $AK>KB$.
All that I have tried was to make such drawing in GeoGebra, which obviously showed me that $AK>KB$, even if I extend $AD$ very, very long. I think the solution should go somehow through similar triangles, but I honestly have no idea how. I would really appreciate any help you provide. To mention more, I seriously don't need the entire solution. Even a little hint would be very helpful for me, since I don't really know where to start.
EDIT: key mistake was made in the previous problem: it's not $AD$ that's larger than $BC$, but $AD$ is larger than side $CD$.
geometry euclidean-geometry quadrilateral
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
$endgroup$
We have a trapezoid $ABCD$ with base $AD$ larger than side $CD$. The bisector of $angle D$ intersects side $AB$ at point $K$. Prove that $AK>KB$.
All that I have tried was to make such drawing in GeoGebra, which obviously showed me that $AK>KB$, even if I extend $AD$ very, very long. I think the solution should go somehow through similar triangles, but I honestly have no idea how. I would really appreciate any help you provide. To mention more, I seriously don't need the entire solution. Even a little hint would be very helpful for me, since I don't really know where to start.
EDIT: key mistake was made in the previous problem: it's not $AD$ that's larger than $BC$, but $AD$ is larger than side $CD$.
geometry euclidean-geometry quadrilateral
geometry euclidean-geometry quadrilateral
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
edited Dec 16 '18 at 12:57
thomas21
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
asked Dec 16 '18 at 9:28
thomas21thomas21
159112
159112
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(Written before the problem statement was corrected)
$AK>KB$ is simply not true in all cases:
In this case $AD>BC$ but $AK<KB$.
Some additional thoughts:
Extend $DK$ and $BC$ and denote the intersection point with $E$. Triangle $EDC$ is isosceles so:
$$EB=EC-BC=CD-BC$$
It's easy to see that triangles BKE and AKD are similar. So we have:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}$$
If $AK>KB$ then :
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}>1tag{1}$$ which is true for
$$AD+BC>CD$$
So this problem needs some additional condtion. Otherwise, the premise is not true in a general case.
EDIT: It turns out that the problem statement was wrong. We have to suppose that $AD>CD$.
In that case, from (1) it is obvious that:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}gt frac{AD}{CD}gt1$$
...or:
$$AK>KB$$
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One obvious way is a way with introduction of a coordinate system. Let $D$ be the origin and $DK$ the y-axis. Say $A$ is one line $y=kx$ then $C$ is on line $y=-kx$, so we have for some positive $a$ and negative $c$: $$A=(a,ka);;;;;;C= (c,-ck)$$
Since $B$ is on a parallel with $AD$ through $C$, which has an equation $$ y = kx -2kc$$ we have, for some $b>c$: $$B= (b,k(b-2c))$$
Now the line $AB$ has an equation $$y -ka = {k(a-b+2c)over a-b}(x-a)$$
so for $x=0$ we get $y$ coordinate of $K$ and we get:
$$ K = (0,{2kacover b-a})$$
Now we can calculate
begin{eqnarray}AK^2-KB^2 &=& a^2+k^2a^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}-b^2-k^2b^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}\
&= &(a^2-b^2)(1+k^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2})\
&geq &0
end{eqnarray}
So $AK> BK$ ONLY IF $a>|b|$. If $|b|>a$ then we have:
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042416%2fgiven-a-trapezoid-with-base-ad-larger-than-side-cd-the-bisector-of-angle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(Written before the problem statement was corrected)
$AK>KB$ is simply not true in all cases:
In this case $AD>BC$ but $AK<KB$.
Some additional thoughts:
Extend $DK$ and $BC$ and denote the intersection point with $E$. Triangle $EDC$ is isosceles so:
$$EB=EC-BC=CD-BC$$
It's easy to see that triangles BKE and AKD are similar. So we have:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}$$
If $AK>KB$ then :
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}>1tag{1}$$ which is true for
$$AD+BC>CD$$
So this problem needs some additional condtion. Otherwise, the premise is not true in a general case.
EDIT: It turns out that the problem statement was wrong. We have to suppose that $AD>CD$.
In that case, from (1) it is obvious that:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}gt frac{AD}{CD}gt1$$
...or:
$$AK>KB$$
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(Written before the problem statement was corrected)
$AK>KB$ is simply not true in all cases:
In this case $AD>BC$ but $AK<KB$.
Some additional thoughts:
Extend $DK$ and $BC$ and denote the intersection point with $E$. Triangle $EDC$ is isosceles so:
$$EB=EC-BC=CD-BC$$
It's easy to see that triangles BKE and AKD are similar. So we have:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}$$
If $AK>KB$ then :
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}>1tag{1}$$ which is true for
$$AD+BC>CD$$
So this problem needs some additional condtion. Otherwise, the premise is not true in a general case.
EDIT: It turns out that the problem statement was wrong. We have to suppose that $AD>CD$.
In that case, from (1) it is obvious that:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}gt frac{AD}{CD}gt1$$
...or:
$$AK>KB$$
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(Written before the problem statement was corrected)
$AK>KB$ is simply not true in all cases:
In this case $AD>BC$ but $AK<KB$.
Some additional thoughts:
Extend $DK$ and $BC$ and denote the intersection point with $E$. Triangle $EDC$ is isosceles so:
$$EB=EC-BC=CD-BC$$
It's easy to see that triangles BKE and AKD are similar. So we have:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}$$
If $AK>KB$ then :
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}>1tag{1}$$ which is true for
$$AD+BC>CD$$
So this problem needs some additional condtion. Otherwise, the premise is not true in a general case.
EDIT: It turns out that the problem statement was wrong. We have to suppose that $AD>CD$.
In that case, from (1) it is obvious that:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}gt frac{AD}{CD}gt1$$
...or:
$$AK>KB$$
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
$endgroup$
(Written before the problem statement was corrected)
$AK>KB$ is simply not true in all cases:
In this case $AD>BC$ but $AK<KB$.
Some additional thoughts:
Extend $DK$ and $BC$ and denote the intersection point with $E$. Triangle $EDC$ is isosceles so:
$$EB=EC-BC=CD-BC$$
It's easy to see that triangles BKE and AKD are similar. So we have:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}$$
If $AK>KB$ then :
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{EB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}>1tag{1}$$ which is true for
$$AD+BC>CD$$
So this problem needs some additional condtion. Otherwise, the premise is not true in a general case.
EDIT: It turns out that the problem statement was wrong. We have to suppose that $AD>CD$.
In that case, from (1) it is obvious that:
$$frac{AK}{KB}=frac{AD}{CD-BC}gt frac{AD}{CD}gt1$$
...or:
$$AK>KB$$
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
edited Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:33
OldboyOldboy
7,3511833
7,3511833
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
@greedoid It's not so much better because someone has downvoted my answer (without leaving a comment, which is really sad). I just think that in simple problems like this one, people expect something from Euclid, not from Descartes.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 12:35
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
My is dowvoted also
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
@thomas21 I have edited my answer.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
$begingroup$
Quite strange how they deleted all comments on my problem post @Oldboy
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 16:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One obvious way is a way with introduction of a coordinate system. Let $D$ be the origin and $DK$ the y-axis. Say $A$ is one line $y=kx$ then $C$ is on line $y=-kx$, so we have for some positive $a$ and negative $c$: $$A=(a,ka);;;;;;C= (c,-ck)$$
Since $B$ is on a parallel with $AD$ through $C$, which has an equation $$ y = kx -2kc$$ we have, for some $b>c$: $$B= (b,k(b-2c))$$
Now the line $AB$ has an equation $$y -ka = {k(a-b+2c)over a-b}(x-a)$$
so for $x=0$ we get $y$ coordinate of $K$ and we get:
$$ K = (0,{2kacover b-a})$$
Now we can calculate
begin{eqnarray}AK^2-KB^2 &=& a^2+k^2a^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}-b^2-k^2b^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}\
&= &(a^2-b^2)(1+k^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2})\
&geq &0
end{eqnarray}
So $AK> BK$ ONLY IF $a>|b|$. If $|b|>a$ then we have:
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One obvious way is a way with introduction of a coordinate system. Let $D$ be the origin and $DK$ the y-axis. Say $A$ is one line $y=kx$ then $C$ is on line $y=-kx$, so we have for some positive $a$ and negative $c$: $$A=(a,ka);;;;;;C= (c,-ck)$$
Since $B$ is on a parallel with $AD$ through $C$, which has an equation $$ y = kx -2kc$$ we have, for some $b>c$: $$B= (b,k(b-2c))$$
Now the line $AB$ has an equation $$y -ka = {k(a-b+2c)over a-b}(x-a)$$
so for $x=0$ we get $y$ coordinate of $K$ and we get:
$$ K = (0,{2kacover b-a})$$
Now we can calculate
begin{eqnarray}AK^2-KB^2 &=& a^2+k^2a^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}-b^2-k^2b^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}\
&= &(a^2-b^2)(1+k^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2})\
&geq &0
end{eqnarray}
So $AK> BK$ ONLY IF $a>|b|$. If $|b|>a$ then we have:
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One obvious way is a way with introduction of a coordinate system. Let $D$ be the origin and $DK$ the y-axis. Say $A$ is one line $y=kx$ then $C$ is on line $y=-kx$, so we have for some positive $a$ and negative $c$: $$A=(a,ka);;;;;;C= (c,-ck)$$
Since $B$ is on a parallel with $AD$ through $C$, which has an equation $$ y = kx -2kc$$ we have, for some $b>c$: $$B= (b,k(b-2c))$$
Now the line $AB$ has an equation $$y -ka = {k(a-b+2c)over a-b}(x-a)$$
so for $x=0$ we get $y$ coordinate of $K$ and we get:
$$ K = (0,{2kacover b-a})$$
Now we can calculate
begin{eqnarray}AK^2-KB^2 &=& a^2+k^2a^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}-b^2-k^2b^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}\
&= &(a^2-b^2)(1+k^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2})\
&geq &0
end{eqnarray}
So $AK> BK$ ONLY IF $a>|b|$. If $|b|>a$ then we have:
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
$endgroup$
One obvious way is a way with introduction of a coordinate system. Let $D$ be the origin and $DK$ the y-axis. Say $A$ is one line $y=kx$ then $C$ is on line $y=-kx$, so we have for some positive $a$ and negative $c$: $$A=(a,ka);;;;;;C= (c,-ck)$$
Since $B$ is on a parallel with $AD$ through $C$, which has an equation $$ y = kx -2kc$$ we have, for some $b>c$: $$B= (b,k(b-2c))$$
Now the line $AB$ has an equation $$y -ka = {k(a-b+2c)over a-b}(x-a)$$
so for $x=0$ we get $y$ coordinate of $K$ and we get:
$$ K = (0,{2kacover b-a})$$
Now we can calculate
begin{eqnarray}AK^2-KB^2 &=& a^2+k^2a^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}-b^2-k^2b^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2}\
&= &(a^2-b^2)(1+k^2{(a-b+2c)^2over (b-a)^2})\
&geq &0
end{eqnarray}
So $AK> BK$ ONLY IF $a>|b|$. If $|b|>a$ then we have:
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
edited Dec 16 '18 at 11:01
Sik Feng Cheong
1599
1599
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
answered Dec 16 '18 at 10:17
greedoidgreedoid
38.9k114797
38.9k114797
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
I apologize, I expected to see the key remark somewhere at the top.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Analysis take me to that. I didn't know it at a begining. However coordinate system helped me a lot at analysis.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
Once again, I am sorry for pulling my gun so quickly :) Upvoting your answer now.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 16 '18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I'm so sorry that I noticed my mistake in this problem after you solved it, and I do still appreciate the work you've put in there, but if you'd want to resolve the problem that was fixed (edit of my post) it's up there.
$endgroup$
– thomas21
Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
Then this prove settles everything.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 16 '18 at 13:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042416%2fgiven-a-trapezoid-with-base-ad-larger-than-side-cd-the-bisector-of-angle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
