Derivation of Ito's Lemma (Strong)












0












$begingroup$


Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:11










  • $begingroup$
    But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
















0












$begingroup$


Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:11










  • $begingroup$
    But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:21














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?



enter image description here







stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 16 '18 at 13:34









DLBDLB

548




548












  • $begingroup$
    That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:11










  • $begingroup$
    But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:21


















  • $begingroup$
    That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:38










  • $begingroup$
    So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:11










  • $begingroup$
    But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – DLB
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
















$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38




$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38












$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08




$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08












$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11




$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11












$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21




$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042606%2fderivation-of-itos-lemma-strong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042606%2fderivation-of-itos-lemma-strong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna