Derivation of Ito's Lemma (Strong)
$begingroup$
Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
Regarding the proof in Thm 1.1, I am confused as to why we can assume that $X_t$ can be substituted into the formula at the top of the image since that formula was derived using a Brownian motion. Is it because the transformation $mu_tdt +sigma_tdB_t$ is a Brownian motion too? and if so, how can one show this?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
asked Dec 16 '18 at 13:34
DLBDLB
548
548
$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042606%2fderivation-of-itos-lemma-strong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042606%2fderivation-of-itos-lemma-strong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
That is because Ito calculus applies not only to Brownian motion, but also to general (continuous semimartingale) processes.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
$begingroup$
So do all general processes have $(dX_t)^2=dt$
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
The equation in the last line is true. But $(dX_t)^2=dt$ is not a general property.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 16 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
But doesn't this have to be a property of all S.P. satisfying the theorem?
$endgroup$
– DLB
Dec 16 '18 at 15:21