Condition for the complex conjugation to be in Gal(P/k)












0












$begingroup$


Let $Pin k[X]$ be a separable polynomial over a field k.



if P has a unique real root in $overline{k}$ then complex conjugation $epsilon$ verifies $epsilon in Gal(P/k)$.



To which extent is this a true statement regarding the degree $n$ of $P$?



I think $n$ needs to be odd for this to be true in order for $epsilon$ to stabilize any splitting field of P over k?



Thank you for your help.






abstract-algebra







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $k subset mathbb{R}$ so for any field $mathbb{C} supset L supset k$ the complex conjugaison $varepsilon$ is a field isomorphism $L to varepsilon(L)$ leaving $k$ fixed. Now if $L$ is the splitting field of $P in k[x]$ then so is $ varepsilon(L)$ and hence $L = varepsilon(L)$ and $varepsilon in Gal(L/k)$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:08












  • $begingroup$
    I mean the following: let's take $k=mathbb{Q}$ and $n=3$. Suppose P has a unique real root and 2 complex roots. we know that for a splitting field of P: $epsilon(L) = L$ because the two complex roots are conjugates. can we generalize this for any n?
    $endgroup$
    – PerelMan
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. All you need is that $P(a) =0 Leftrightarrow 0 = varepsilon(P(a)) = P(varepsilon(a))$. So $P$ splits completely in $L$ iff it splits completely in $varepsilon(L)$, and $L$ is the smallest such field implies so is $varepsilon(L)$ and $L = varepsilon(L)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:20


















0












$begingroup$


Let $Pin k[X]$ be a separable polynomial over a field k.



if P has a unique real root in $overline{k}$ then complex conjugation $epsilon$ verifies $epsilon in Gal(P/k)$.



To which extent is this a true statement regarding the degree $n$ of $P$?



I think $n$ needs to be odd for this to be true in order for $epsilon$ to stabilize any splitting field of P over k?



Thank you for your help.






abstract-algebra







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $k subset mathbb{R}$ so for any field $mathbb{C} supset L supset k$ the complex conjugaison $varepsilon$ is a field isomorphism $L to varepsilon(L)$ leaving $k$ fixed. Now if $L$ is the splitting field of $P in k[x]$ then so is $ varepsilon(L)$ and hence $L = varepsilon(L)$ and $varepsilon in Gal(L/k)$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:08












  • $begingroup$
    I mean the following: let's take $k=mathbb{Q}$ and $n=3$. Suppose P has a unique real root and 2 complex roots. we know that for a splitting field of P: $epsilon(L) = L$ because the two complex roots are conjugates. can we generalize this for any n?
    $endgroup$
    – PerelMan
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. All you need is that $P(a) =0 Leftrightarrow 0 = varepsilon(P(a)) = P(varepsilon(a))$. So $P$ splits completely in $L$ iff it splits completely in $varepsilon(L)$, and $L$ is the smallest such field implies so is $varepsilon(L)$ and $L = varepsilon(L)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:20
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $Pin k[X]$ be a separable polynomial over a field k.



if P has a unique real root in $overline{k}$ then complex conjugation $epsilon$ verifies $epsilon in Gal(P/k)$.



To which extent is this a true statement regarding the degree $n$ of $P$?



I think $n$ needs to be odd for this to be true in order for $epsilon$ to stabilize any splitting field of P over k?



Thank you for your help.






abstract-algebra







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $Pin k[X]$ be a separable polynomial over a field k.



if P has a unique real root in $overline{k}$ then complex conjugation $epsilon$ verifies $epsilon in Gal(P/k)$.



To which extent is this a true statement regarding the degree $n$ of $P$?



I think $n$ needs to be odd for this to be true in order for $epsilon$ to stabilize any splitting field of P over k?



Thank you for your help.






abstract-algebra




abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 0:14









Bernard

121k740116




121k740116










asked Dec 26 '18 at 23:53









PerelManPerelMan

544311




544311












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $k subset mathbb{R}$ so for any field $mathbb{C} supset L supset k$ the complex conjugaison $varepsilon$ is a field isomorphism $L to varepsilon(L)$ leaving $k$ fixed. Now if $L$ is the splitting field of $P in k[x]$ then so is $ varepsilon(L)$ and hence $L = varepsilon(L)$ and $varepsilon in Gal(L/k)$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:08












  • $begingroup$
    I mean the following: let's take $k=mathbb{Q}$ and $n=3$. Suppose P has a unique real root and 2 complex roots. we know that for a splitting field of P: $epsilon(L) = L$ because the two complex roots are conjugates. can we generalize this for any n?
    $endgroup$
    – PerelMan
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. All you need is that $P(a) =0 Leftrightarrow 0 = varepsilon(P(a)) = P(varepsilon(a))$. So $P$ splits completely in $L$ iff it splits completely in $varepsilon(L)$, and $L$ is the smallest such field implies so is $varepsilon(L)$ and $L = varepsilon(L)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:20




















  • $begingroup$
    You mean $k subset mathbb{R}$ so for any field $mathbb{C} supset L supset k$ the complex conjugaison $varepsilon$ is a field isomorphism $L to varepsilon(L)$ leaving $k$ fixed. Now if $L$ is the splitting field of $P in k[x]$ then so is $ varepsilon(L)$ and hence $L = varepsilon(L)$ and $varepsilon in Gal(L/k)$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:08












  • $begingroup$
    I mean the following: let's take $k=mathbb{Q}$ and $n=3$. Suppose P has a unique real root and 2 complex roots. we know that for a splitting field of P: $epsilon(L) = L$ because the two complex roots are conjugates. can we generalize this for any n?
    $endgroup$
    – PerelMan
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. All you need is that $P(a) =0 Leftrightarrow 0 = varepsilon(P(a)) = P(varepsilon(a))$. So $P$ splits completely in $L$ iff it splits completely in $varepsilon(L)$, and $L$ is the smallest such field implies so is $varepsilon(L)$ and $L = varepsilon(L)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 27 '18 at 0:20


















$begingroup$
You mean $k subset mathbb{R}$ so for any field $mathbb{C} supset L supset k$ the complex conjugaison $varepsilon$ is a field isomorphism $L to varepsilon(L)$ leaving $k$ fixed. Now if $L$ is the splitting field of $P in k[x]$ then so is $ varepsilon(L)$ and hence $L = varepsilon(L)$ and $varepsilon in Gal(L/k)$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 27 '18 at 0:08






$begingroup$
You mean $k subset mathbb{R}$ so for any field $mathbb{C} supset L supset k$ the complex conjugaison $varepsilon$ is a field isomorphism $L to varepsilon(L)$ leaving $k$ fixed. Now if $L$ is the splitting field of $P in k[x]$ then so is $ varepsilon(L)$ and hence $L = varepsilon(L)$ and $varepsilon in Gal(L/k)$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 27 '18 at 0:08














$begingroup$
I mean the following: let's take $k=mathbb{Q}$ and $n=3$. Suppose P has a unique real root and 2 complex roots. we know that for a splitting field of P: $epsilon(L) = L$ because the two complex roots are conjugates. can we generalize this for any n?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 27 '18 at 0:14






$begingroup$
I mean the following: let's take $k=mathbb{Q}$ and $n=3$. Suppose P has a unique real root and 2 complex roots. we know that for a splitting field of P: $epsilon(L) = L$ because the two complex roots are conjugates. can we generalize this for any n?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 27 '18 at 0:14






1




1




$begingroup$
Yes. All you need is that $P(a) =0 Leftrightarrow 0 = varepsilon(P(a)) = P(varepsilon(a))$. So $P$ splits completely in $L$ iff it splits completely in $varepsilon(L)$, and $L$ is the smallest such field implies so is $varepsilon(L)$ and $L = varepsilon(L)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 27 '18 at 0:20






$begingroup$
Yes. All you need is that $P(a) =0 Leftrightarrow 0 = varepsilon(P(a)) = P(varepsilon(a))$. So $P$ splits completely in $L$ iff it splits completely in $varepsilon(L)$, and $L$ is the smallest such field implies so is $varepsilon(L)$ and $L = varepsilon(L)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 27 '18 at 0:20












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If $k$ is a subfield of $mathbb{R}$, then complex conjugation gives an element of the Galois group of any polynomial $Pin k[X]$ whatsoever. Indeed, if $Lsubseteqmathbb{C}$ is the splitting field of $P$ over $k$, then complex conjugation maps $L$ to itself (since it maps $k$ to itself and thus permutes the roots of $P$) and so is an automorphism of $L$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053447%2fcondition-for-the-complex-conjugation-to-be-in-galp-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    If $k$ is a subfield of $mathbb{R}$, then complex conjugation gives an element of the Galois group of any polynomial $Pin k[X]$ whatsoever. Indeed, if $Lsubseteqmathbb{C}$ is the splitting field of $P$ over $k$, then complex conjugation maps $L$ to itself (since it maps $k$ to itself and thus permutes the roots of $P$) and so is an automorphism of $L$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      If $k$ is a subfield of $mathbb{R}$, then complex conjugation gives an element of the Galois group of any polynomial $Pin k[X]$ whatsoever. Indeed, if $Lsubseteqmathbb{C}$ is the splitting field of $P$ over $k$, then complex conjugation maps $L$ to itself (since it maps $k$ to itself and thus permutes the roots of $P$) and so is an automorphism of $L$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        If $k$ is a subfield of $mathbb{R}$, then complex conjugation gives an element of the Galois group of any polynomial $Pin k[X]$ whatsoever. Indeed, if $Lsubseteqmathbb{C}$ is the splitting field of $P$ over $k$, then complex conjugation maps $L$ to itself (since it maps $k$ to itself and thus permutes the roots of $P$) and so is an automorphism of $L$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If $k$ is a subfield of $mathbb{R}$, then complex conjugation gives an element of the Galois group of any polynomial $Pin k[X]$ whatsoever. Indeed, if $Lsubseteqmathbb{C}$ is the splitting field of $P$ over $k$, then complex conjugation maps $L$ to itself (since it maps $k$ to itself and thus permutes the roots of $P$) and so is an automorphism of $L$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 27 '18 at 0:25









        Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

        186k14215342




        186k14215342






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053447%2fcondition-for-the-complex-conjugation-to-be-in-galp-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
            Read more

            Cabo Verde

            Image
              Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º)
            Read more

            Gyllenstierna

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
            Read more