Why non surjective polynomial map between $A^n$ and $A^m$ demand image closed algebraic set?












2












$begingroup$


Let $f_iin C[x_1,dots, x_n]$ with $ileq m$. Suppose $f_i$ are algebraically independent functions. Consider the map $phi:A^nto A^m$ by $phi(x_1,dots, x_n)=(f_i(x_1,dots, x_n))_i$. Suppose $phi$ is non surjection. Then $Im(phi)$ is closed algebraic subset of $A^n$.



$textbf{Q:}$ Why is $Im(phi)$ a closed subset if $phi$ is not surjection? I could imagine $A^2to A^2$ by $(x,y)to (x,xy)$. Clearly $x,xy$ are algebraically independent. Furhtermore, the map is not surjection as part of $x=0$ axis is missing. It is worse that the image is not closed algebraic set. Have I misunderstood the statement?



Context: The book tries to explain $f_i$ algebraic independence/essential parameters is equivalent to surjectivity of the map $phi$ above.



Ref. Beltrametti M.C., et al. - Lectures on curves, surfaces and projective varieties Sec 3.2 of Chpt 3, Pg 62










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $f_iin C[x_1,dots, x_n]$ with $ileq m$. Suppose $f_i$ are algebraically independent functions. Consider the map $phi:A^nto A^m$ by $phi(x_1,dots, x_n)=(f_i(x_1,dots, x_n))_i$. Suppose $phi$ is non surjection. Then $Im(phi)$ is closed algebraic subset of $A^n$.



    $textbf{Q:}$ Why is $Im(phi)$ a closed subset if $phi$ is not surjection? I could imagine $A^2to A^2$ by $(x,y)to (x,xy)$. Clearly $x,xy$ are algebraically independent. Furhtermore, the map is not surjection as part of $x=0$ axis is missing. It is worse that the image is not closed algebraic set. Have I misunderstood the statement?



    Context: The book tries to explain $f_i$ algebraic independence/essential parameters is equivalent to surjectivity of the map $phi$ above.



    Ref. Beltrametti M.C., et al. - Lectures on curves, surfaces and projective varieties Sec 3.2 of Chpt 3, Pg 62










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let $f_iin C[x_1,dots, x_n]$ with $ileq m$. Suppose $f_i$ are algebraically independent functions. Consider the map $phi:A^nto A^m$ by $phi(x_1,dots, x_n)=(f_i(x_1,dots, x_n))_i$. Suppose $phi$ is non surjection. Then $Im(phi)$ is closed algebraic subset of $A^n$.



      $textbf{Q:}$ Why is $Im(phi)$ a closed subset if $phi$ is not surjection? I could imagine $A^2to A^2$ by $(x,y)to (x,xy)$. Clearly $x,xy$ are algebraically independent. Furhtermore, the map is not surjection as part of $x=0$ axis is missing. It is worse that the image is not closed algebraic set. Have I misunderstood the statement?



      Context: The book tries to explain $f_i$ algebraic independence/essential parameters is equivalent to surjectivity of the map $phi$ above.



      Ref. Beltrametti M.C., et al. - Lectures on curves, surfaces and projective varieties Sec 3.2 of Chpt 3, Pg 62










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $f_iin C[x_1,dots, x_n]$ with $ileq m$. Suppose $f_i$ are algebraically independent functions. Consider the map $phi:A^nto A^m$ by $phi(x_1,dots, x_n)=(f_i(x_1,dots, x_n))_i$. Suppose $phi$ is non surjection. Then $Im(phi)$ is closed algebraic subset of $A^n$.



      $textbf{Q:}$ Why is $Im(phi)$ a closed subset if $phi$ is not surjection? I could imagine $A^2to A^2$ by $(x,y)to (x,xy)$. Clearly $x,xy$ are algebraically independent. Furhtermore, the map is not surjection as part of $x=0$ axis is missing. It is worse that the image is not closed algebraic set. Have I misunderstood the statement?



      Context: The book tries to explain $f_i$ algebraic independence/essential parameters is equivalent to surjectivity of the map $phi$ above.



      Ref. Beltrametti M.C., et al. - Lectures on curves, surfaces and projective varieties Sec 3.2 of Chpt 3, Pg 62







      abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '18 at 0:19









      user45765user45765

      2,7332722




      2,7332722






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is just an error in the text. You are correct that the image of $varphi$ need not be closed. The result being proved (that $varphi$ is surjective iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent) is simply wrong, as your example also shows. The correct statement is that $varphi$ is dominant (has dense image) iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
            $endgroup$
            – user45765
            Dec 27 '18 at 0:48











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053455%2fwhy-non-surjective-polynomial-map-between-an-and-am-demand-image-closed-al%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          This is just an error in the text. You are correct that the image of $varphi$ need not be closed. The result being proved (that $varphi$ is surjective iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent) is simply wrong, as your example also shows. The correct statement is that $varphi$ is dominant (has dense image) iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
            $endgroup$
            – user45765
            Dec 27 '18 at 0:48
















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is just an error in the text. You are correct that the image of $varphi$ need not be closed. The result being proved (that $varphi$ is surjective iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent) is simply wrong, as your example also shows. The correct statement is that $varphi$ is dominant (has dense image) iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
            $endgroup$
            – user45765
            Dec 27 '18 at 0:48














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is just an error in the text. You are correct that the image of $varphi$ need not be closed. The result being proved (that $varphi$ is surjective iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent) is simply wrong, as your example also shows. The correct statement is that $varphi$ is dominant (has dense image) iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is just an error in the text. You are correct that the image of $varphi$ need not be closed. The result being proved (that $varphi$ is surjective iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent) is simply wrong, as your example also shows. The correct statement is that $varphi$ is dominant (has dense image) iff the $f_i$ are algebraically independent.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 27 '18 at 0:47









          Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

          186k14215342




          186k14215342












          • $begingroup$
            Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
            $endgroup$
            – user45765
            Dec 27 '18 at 0:48


















          • $begingroup$
            Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
            $endgroup$
            – user45765
            Dec 27 '18 at 0:48
















          $begingroup$
          Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
          $endgroup$
          – user45765
          Dec 27 '18 at 0:48




          $begingroup$
          Ah in that case, it seems very reasonable.
          $endgroup$
          – user45765
          Dec 27 '18 at 0:48


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053455%2fwhy-non-surjective-polynomial-map-between-an-and-am-demand-image-closed-al%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna