Find equally-weighted complete graphs












6












$begingroup$


Graph theory is used to study the relations between objects. A graph is composed of vertices and edges in a diagram such as this:



A-----B
| /
| /
| / E
| / /
|/ /
C-----D


In the above diagram, A is linked to B and C; B is linked to A, C, and E; C is linked to A, B, and D; D is linked to C and E; and E is linked to B and D. As that description was rather wordy, a graph can be represented as a symmetric boolean matrix where a 1 represents a connection and a 0 represents the lack thereof. The above matrix is translated to this:



01100
10101
11010
00101
01010


For the purpose of this problem, the matrix definition can be extended to include the distances or weights of the paths between nodes. If individual ASCII characters in the diagram have weight 1, he matrix would be:



05500
50502
55050
00502
02020


A "complete graph" consists of a set of points such that each point is linked to every other point. The above graph is incomplete because it lacks connections from A to D and E, B to D, and C to E. However, the subgraph between A, B, and C is complete (and equally weighted). A 4-complete graph would look like this:



A---B
| /|
| X |
|/ |
C---D


and would be represented by the matrix:



01111
10111
11011
11101
11110


This problem is as follows: Given a symmetric matrix representing a graph and a positive integer n, find the number of distinct equally-weighted complete subgraphs of size n contained within.



You may assume that the input matrix is numeric and symmetric, and may choose input/output format. An entry in the matrix may be part of multiple equally-weighted subgraphs as long as they are distinct and of equal size. You may assume that n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 3.



The winning criterion for this challenge is code golf. Standard rules apply.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Test cases wouldn't go amiss.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Can complete graphs contain redundant self-connections (e.g. A to A)?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @JonathanAllan Complete graphs can but do not necessarily contain self-connections.
    $endgroup$
    – Arcturus
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:48










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:54
















6












$begingroup$


Graph theory is used to study the relations between objects. A graph is composed of vertices and edges in a diagram such as this:



A-----B
| /
| /
| / E
| / /
|/ /
C-----D


In the above diagram, A is linked to B and C; B is linked to A, C, and E; C is linked to A, B, and D; D is linked to C and E; and E is linked to B and D. As that description was rather wordy, a graph can be represented as a symmetric boolean matrix where a 1 represents a connection and a 0 represents the lack thereof. The above matrix is translated to this:



01100
10101
11010
00101
01010


For the purpose of this problem, the matrix definition can be extended to include the distances or weights of the paths between nodes. If individual ASCII characters in the diagram have weight 1, he matrix would be:



05500
50502
55050
00502
02020


A "complete graph" consists of a set of points such that each point is linked to every other point. The above graph is incomplete because it lacks connections from A to D and E, B to D, and C to E. However, the subgraph between A, B, and C is complete (and equally weighted). A 4-complete graph would look like this:



A---B
| /|
| X |
|/ |
C---D


and would be represented by the matrix:



01111
10111
11011
11101
11110


This problem is as follows: Given a symmetric matrix representing a graph and a positive integer n, find the number of distinct equally-weighted complete subgraphs of size n contained within.



You may assume that the input matrix is numeric and symmetric, and may choose input/output format. An entry in the matrix may be part of multiple equally-weighted subgraphs as long as they are distinct and of equal size. You may assume that n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 3.



The winning criterion for this challenge is code golf. Standard rules apply.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Test cases wouldn't go amiss.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Can complete graphs contain redundant self-connections (e.g. A to A)?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @JonathanAllan Complete graphs can but do not necessarily contain self-connections.
    $endgroup$
    – Arcturus
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:48










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:54














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Graph theory is used to study the relations between objects. A graph is composed of vertices and edges in a diagram such as this:



A-----B
| /
| /
| / E
| / /
|/ /
C-----D


In the above diagram, A is linked to B and C; B is linked to A, C, and E; C is linked to A, B, and D; D is linked to C and E; and E is linked to B and D. As that description was rather wordy, a graph can be represented as a symmetric boolean matrix where a 1 represents a connection and a 0 represents the lack thereof. The above matrix is translated to this:



01100
10101
11010
00101
01010


For the purpose of this problem, the matrix definition can be extended to include the distances or weights of the paths between nodes. If individual ASCII characters in the diagram have weight 1, he matrix would be:



05500
50502
55050
00502
02020


A "complete graph" consists of a set of points such that each point is linked to every other point. The above graph is incomplete because it lacks connections from A to D and E, B to D, and C to E. However, the subgraph between A, B, and C is complete (and equally weighted). A 4-complete graph would look like this:



A---B
| /|
| X |
|/ |
C---D


and would be represented by the matrix:



01111
10111
11011
11101
11110


This problem is as follows: Given a symmetric matrix representing a graph and a positive integer n, find the number of distinct equally-weighted complete subgraphs of size n contained within.



You may assume that the input matrix is numeric and symmetric, and may choose input/output format. An entry in the matrix may be part of multiple equally-weighted subgraphs as long as they are distinct and of equal size. You may assume that n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 3.



The winning criterion for this challenge is code golf. Standard rules apply.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Graph theory is used to study the relations between objects. A graph is composed of vertices and edges in a diagram such as this:



A-----B
| /
| /
| / E
| / /
|/ /
C-----D


In the above diagram, A is linked to B and C; B is linked to A, C, and E; C is linked to A, B, and D; D is linked to C and E; and E is linked to B and D. As that description was rather wordy, a graph can be represented as a symmetric boolean matrix where a 1 represents a connection and a 0 represents the lack thereof. The above matrix is translated to this:



01100
10101
11010
00101
01010


For the purpose of this problem, the matrix definition can be extended to include the distances or weights of the paths between nodes. If individual ASCII characters in the diagram have weight 1, he matrix would be:



05500
50502
55050
00502
02020


A "complete graph" consists of a set of points such that each point is linked to every other point. The above graph is incomplete because it lacks connections from A to D and E, B to D, and C to E. However, the subgraph between A, B, and C is complete (and equally weighted). A 4-complete graph would look like this:



A---B
| /|
| X |
|/ |
C---D


and would be represented by the matrix:



01111
10111
11011
11101
11110


This problem is as follows: Given a symmetric matrix representing a graph and a positive integer n, find the number of distinct equally-weighted complete subgraphs of size n contained within.



You may assume that the input matrix is numeric and symmetric, and may choose input/output format. An entry in the matrix may be part of multiple equally-weighted subgraphs as long as they are distinct and of equal size. You may assume that n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 3.



The winning criterion for this challenge is code golf. Standard rules apply.







code-golf matrix graph-theory






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:27









ArcturusArcturus

3,56511964




3,56511964








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Test cases wouldn't go amiss.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Can complete graphs contain redundant self-connections (e.g. A to A)?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @JonathanAllan Complete graphs can but do not necessarily contain self-connections.
    $endgroup$
    – Arcturus
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:48










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:54














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Test cases wouldn't go amiss.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Can complete graphs contain redundant self-connections (e.g. A to A)?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @JonathanAllan Complete graphs can but do not necessarily contain self-connections.
    $endgroup$
    – Arcturus
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:48










  • $begingroup$
    ... and if so must they be n too?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:54








6




6




$begingroup$
Test cases wouldn't go amiss.
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:32




$begingroup$
Test cases wouldn't go amiss.
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:32












$begingroup$
Can complete graphs contain redundant self-connections (e.g. A to A)?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:40




$begingroup$
Can complete graphs contain redundant self-connections (e.g. A to A)?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:40












$begingroup$
... and if so must they be n too?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45




$begingroup$
... and if so must they be n too?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45












$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan Complete graphs can but do not necessarily contain self-connections.
$endgroup$
– Arcturus
Dec 30 '18 at 16:48




$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan Complete graphs can but do not necessarily contain self-connections.
$endgroup$
– Arcturus
Dec 30 '18 at 16:48












$begingroup$
... and if so must they be n too?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:54




$begingroup$
... and if so must they be n too?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Dec 30 '18 at 16:54










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$


Jelly, 16 bytes



ịⱮịŒDḊẎE
Jœcç€⁸S


Try it online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$


    Jelly,  18 16  15 bytes



    Assumes self-connections may be any weight (i.e. they are not necessarily only either $0$ or the equal weight).



    Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S


    Try it online!

    the two subsets of size 3 being ACE and BCD
    With n=2 all 10 subsets of size 2 work as its symmetric.



    How?



    Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S - Link: list of lists of integers, M; integer, n
    J - range of length of M = [1,2,3,...,length(M)]
    œc - Combinations of length n e.g. [[1,2,3],[1,2,4],[1,3,4],[2,3,4]]
    € - for each:
    Ʋ - last four links as a monad:
    ṗ2 - Cartesian power with 2
    Ðḟ - discard if:
    E - all-equal (i.e. diagonal co-ordinates like [3,3])
    œị - multi-dimensional index into:
    ³ - program's 3rd argument (1st input), M
    E - all equal?
    S - sum





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$


      Python 2, 195 bytes 178 bytes 168 bytes



      I'm sure there's a lot more golfing possible here, but for a change I want to get an entry in before there are dozens of other ones. I've provided a couple of test cases on TIO, but would love more examples.



      First round of suggested golf steps: Remove some spaces, be smarter about the import. Shorter way of testing if the single link value in a set is zero (Thanks to M. XCoder).



      Second round: ElPedro points out that in this case a program is shorter than the function. I was hoping to find a way to package this as a lambda, so was thinking "function" from the start. Thanks.





      from itertools import*
      r=set()
      M,n=input()
      for g in set(combinations(range(len(M)),n)):
      s={M[i][j]for i in g for j in g if i>j}
      if len(s)==1and{0}!=s:r.add(g)
      print r


      Try it online!



      A slightly ungolfed version, to clarify logic:



      from itertools import combinations
      def f3(M,n):
      r = set()
      groups = set(combinations(range(len(M)), n)) # all possible combinations of indexes
      for group in groups:
      # Generate a set of link values associated with the current combination
      # This selects only non-diagonal indexes, assuming matrix symmetry.
      s = {M[i][j]for i in group for j in group if i>j}
      # If the set has only one member, and that's not zero, you have
      # a connected subgraph.
      if len(s) == 1 and 0 not in s:
      r.add(group)
      return r





      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        178 bytes.
        $endgroup$
        – Don't be a x-triple dot
        Dec 31 '18 at 10:25






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
        $endgroup$
        – ElPedro
        Dec 31 '18 at 12:13










      • $begingroup$
        @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
        $endgroup$
        – ElPedro
        Dec 31 '18 at 12:15





















      0












      $begingroup$


      Clean, 152 bytes



      import StdEnv,Data.List
      $m n=sum[1\i<-subsequences[0..size m-1]|length i==n,j<-permutations i|case[m.[x,y]\x<-i&y<-j]of[u:v]=all((==)u)v&&u>0;_=1<0]/2


      Try it online!



      TIO driver takes n as a command-line argument and the matrix through STDIN (weights up to 9).



      The actual function $ :: {#{#Int}} Int -> Int works with any size weights.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$


        Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 90 bytes



        There is probably some room to further golf this, after some test cases are posted.



        We construct a graph from the unitized adjacency matrix, and then use the FindClique function with All as the third argument to list out the vertices with complete subgraphs. We then select the submatrices of the original input corresponding to the cliques (which will have zeros along the diagonal) and count the number of distinct elements which should be 2 if the weights are equal.



        In this implementation, self connections can have a weight other than zero and the graph will still be considered complete and equal weighted, so long as the weights of all self connections in the subgraph are identical.



        Count[Length@*Union@@@(b[[#,#]]&/@FindClique[AdjacencyGraph[Unitize/@(b=#)],{#2},All]),2]&


        Try it online!






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "200"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f178147%2ffind-equally-weighted-complete-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$


          Jelly, 16 bytes



          ịⱮịŒDḊẎE
          Jœcç€⁸S


          Try it online!






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$


















            1












            $begingroup$


            Jelly, 16 bytes



            ịⱮịŒDḊẎE
            Jœcç€⁸S


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$
















              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$


              Jelly, 16 bytes



              ịⱮịŒDḊẎE
              Jœcç€⁸S


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$




              Jelly, 16 bytes



              ịⱮịŒDḊẎE
              Jœcç€⁸S


              Try it online!







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Dec 30 '18 at 21:00

























              answered Dec 30 '18 at 20:28









              Erik the OutgolferErik the Outgolfer

              32k429103




              32k429103























                  1












                  $begingroup$


                  Jelly,  18 16  15 bytes



                  Assumes self-connections may be any weight (i.e. they are not necessarily only either $0$ or the equal weight).



                  Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S


                  Try it online!

                  the two subsets of size 3 being ACE and BCD
                  With n=2 all 10 subsets of size 2 work as its symmetric.



                  How?



                  Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S - Link: list of lists of integers, M; integer, n
                  J - range of length of M = [1,2,3,...,length(M)]
                  œc - Combinations of length n e.g. [[1,2,3],[1,2,4],[1,3,4],[2,3,4]]
                  € - for each:
                  Ʋ - last four links as a monad:
                  ṗ2 - Cartesian power with 2
                  Ðḟ - discard if:
                  E - all-equal (i.e. diagonal co-ordinates like [3,3])
                  œị - multi-dimensional index into:
                  ³ - program's 3rd argument (1st input), M
                  E - all equal?
                  S - sum





                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    1












                    $begingroup$


                    Jelly,  18 16  15 bytes



                    Assumes self-connections may be any weight (i.e. they are not necessarily only either $0$ or the equal weight).



                    Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S


                    Try it online!

                    the two subsets of size 3 being ACE and BCD
                    With n=2 all 10 subsets of size 2 work as its symmetric.



                    How?



                    Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S - Link: list of lists of integers, M; integer, n
                    J - range of length of M = [1,2,3,...,length(M)]
                    œc - Combinations of length n e.g. [[1,2,3],[1,2,4],[1,3,4],[2,3,4]]
                    € - for each:
                    Ʋ - last four links as a monad:
                    ṗ2 - Cartesian power with 2
                    Ðḟ - discard if:
                    E - all-equal (i.e. diagonal co-ordinates like [3,3])
                    œị - multi-dimensional index into:
                    ³ - program's 3rd argument (1st input), M
                    E - all equal?
                    S - sum





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$
















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$


                      Jelly,  18 16  15 bytes



                      Assumes self-connections may be any weight (i.e. they are not necessarily only either $0$ or the equal weight).



                      Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S


                      Try it online!

                      the two subsets of size 3 being ACE and BCD
                      With n=2 all 10 subsets of size 2 work as its symmetric.



                      How?



                      Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S - Link: list of lists of integers, M; integer, n
                      J - range of length of M = [1,2,3,...,length(M)]
                      œc - Combinations of length n e.g. [[1,2,3],[1,2,4],[1,3,4],[2,3,4]]
                      € - for each:
                      Ʋ - last four links as a monad:
                      ṗ2 - Cartesian power with 2
                      Ðḟ - discard if:
                      E - all-equal (i.e. diagonal co-ordinates like [3,3])
                      œị - multi-dimensional index into:
                      ³ - program's 3rd argument (1st input), M
                      E - all equal?
                      S - sum





                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$




                      Jelly,  18 16  15 bytes



                      Assumes self-connections may be any weight (i.e. they are not necessarily only either $0$ or the equal weight).



                      Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S


                      Try it online!

                      the two subsets of size 3 being ACE and BCD
                      With n=2 all 10 subsets of size 2 work as its symmetric.



                      How?



                      Jœcṗ2EÐḟœị³EƲ€S - Link: list of lists of integers, M; integer, n
                      J - range of length of M = [1,2,3,...,length(M)]
                      œc - Combinations of length n e.g. [[1,2,3],[1,2,4],[1,3,4],[2,3,4]]
                      € - for each:
                      Ʋ - last four links as a monad:
                      ṗ2 - Cartesian power with 2
                      Ðḟ - discard if:
                      E - all-equal (i.e. diagonal co-ordinates like [3,3])
                      œị - multi-dimensional index into:
                      ³ - program's 3rd argument (1st input), M
                      E - all equal?
                      S - sum






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Dec 30 '18 at 21:28

























                      answered Dec 30 '18 at 17:47









                      Jonathan AllanJonathan Allan

                      52.3k535170




                      52.3k535170























                          1












                          $begingroup$


                          Python 2, 195 bytes 178 bytes 168 bytes



                          I'm sure there's a lot more golfing possible here, but for a change I want to get an entry in before there are dozens of other ones. I've provided a couple of test cases on TIO, but would love more examples.



                          First round of suggested golf steps: Remove some spaces, be smarter about the import. Shorter way of testing if the single link value in a set is zero (Thanks to M. XCoder).



                          Second round: ElPedro points out that in this case a program is shorter than the function. I was hoping to find a way to package this as a lambda, so was thinking "function" from the start. Thanks.





                          from itertools import*
                          r=set()
                          M,n=input()
                          for g in set(combinations(range(len(M)),n)):
                          s={M[i][j]for i in g for j in g if i>j}
                          if len(s)==1and{0}!=s:r.add(g)
                          print r


                          Try it online!



                          A slightly ungolfed version, to clarify logic:



                          from itertools import combinations
                          def f3(M,n):
                          r = set()
                          groups = set(combinations(range(len(M)), n)) # all possible combinations of indexes
                          for group in groups:
                          # Generate a set of link values associated with the current combination
                          # This selects only non-diagonal indexes, assuming matrix symmetry.
                          s = {M[i][j]for i in group for j in group if i>j}
                          # If the set has only one member, and that's not zero, you have
                          # a connected subgraph.
                          if len(s) == 1 and 0 not in s:
                          r.add(group)
                          return r





                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$









                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            178 bytes.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don't be a x-triple dot
                            Dec 31 '18 at 10:25






                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:13










                          • $begingroup$
                            @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:15


















                          1












                          $begingroup$


                          Python 2, 195 bytes 178 bytes 168 bytes



                          I'm sure there's a lot more golfing possible here, but for a change I want to get an entry in before there are dozens of other ones. I've provided a couple of test cases on TIO, but would love more examples.



                          First round of suggested golf steps: Remove some spaces, be smarter about the import. Shorter way of testing if the single link value in a set is zero (Thanks to M. XCoder).



                          Second round: ElPedro points out that in this case a program is shorter than the function. I was hoping to find a way to package this as a lambda, so was thinking "function" from the start. Thanks.





                          from itertools import*
                          r=set()
                          M,n=input()
                          for g in set(combinations(range(len(M)),n)):
                          s={M[i][j]for i in g for j in g if i>j}
                          if len(s)==1and{0}!=s:r.add(g)
                          print r


                          Try it online!



                          A slightly ungolfed version, to clarify logic:



                          from itertools import combinations
                          def f3(M,n):
                          r = set()
                          groups = set(combinations(range(len(M)), n)) # all possible combinations of indexes
                          for group in groups:
                          # Generate a set of link values associated with the current combination
                          # This selects only non-diagonal indexes, assuming matrix symmetry.
                          s = {M[i][j]for i in group for j in group if i>j}
                          # If the set has only one member, and that's not zero, you have
                          # a connected subgraph.
                          if len(s) == 1 and 0 not in s:
                          r.add(group)
                          return r





                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$









                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            178 bytes.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don't be a x-triple dot
                            Dec 31 '18 at 10:25






                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:13










                          • $begingroup$
                            @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:15
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$


                          Python 2, 195 bytes 178 bytes 168 bytes



                          I'm sure there's a lot more golfing possible here, but for a change I want to get an entry in before there are dozens of other ones. I've provided a couple of test cases on TIO, but would love more examples.



                          First round of suggested golf steps: Remove some spaces, be smarter about the import. Shorter way of testing if the single link value in a set is zero (Thanks to M. XCoder).



                          Second round: ElPedro points out that in this case a program is shorter than the function. I was hoping to find a way to package this as a lambda, so was thinking "function" from the start. Thanks.





                          from itertools import*
                          r=set()
                          M,n=input()
                          for g in set(combinations(range(len(M)),n)):
                          s={M[i][j]for i in g for j in g if i>j}
                          if len(s)==1and{0}!=s:r.add(g)
                          print r


                          Try it online!



                          A slightly ungolfed version, to clarify logic:



                          from itertools import combinations
                          def f3(M,n):
                          r = set()
                          groups = set(combinations(range(len(M)), n)) # all possible combinations of indexes
                          for group in groups:
                          # Generate a set of link values associated with the current combination
                          # This selects only non-diagonal indexes, assuming matrix symmetry.
                          s = {M[i][j]for i in group for j in group if i>j}
                          # If the set has only one member, and that's not zero, you have
                          # a connected subgraph.
                          if len(s) == 1 and 0 not in s:
                          r.add(group)
                          return r





                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$




                          Python 2, 195 bytes 178 bytes 168 bytes



                          I'm sure there's a lot more golfing possible here, but for a change I want to get an entry in before there are dozens of other ones. I've provided a couple of test cases on TIO, but would love more examples.



                          First round of suggested golf steps: Remove some spaces, be smarter about the import. Shorter way of testing if the single link value in a set is zero (Thanks to M. XCoder).



                          Second round: ElPedro points out that in this case a program is shorter than the function. I was hoping to find a way to package this as a lambda, so was thinking "function" from the start. Thanks.





                          from itertools import*
                          r=set()
                          M,n=input()
                          for g in set(combinations(range(len(M)),n)):
                          s={M[i][j]for i in g for j in g if i>j}
                          if len(s)==1and{0}!=s:r.add(g)
                          print r


                          Try it online!



                          A slightly ungolfed version, to clarify logic:



                          from itertools import combinations
                          def f3(M,n):
                          r = set()
                          groups = set(combinations(range(len(M)), n)) # all possible combinations of indexes
                          for group in groups:
                          # Generate a set of link values associated with the current combination
                          # This selects only non-diagonal indexes, assuming matrix symmetry.
                          s = {M[i][j]for i in group for j in group if i>j}
                          # If the set has only one member, and that's not zero, you have
                          # a connected subgraph.
                          if len(s) == 1 and 0 not in s:
                          r.add(group)
                          return r






                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Dec 31 '18 at 12:23

























                          answered Dec 31 '18 at 3:40









                          CCB60CCB60

                          1595




                          1595








                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            178 bytes.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don't be a x-triple dot
                            Dec 31 '18 at 10:25






                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:13










                          • $begingroup$
                            @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:15
















                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            178 bytes.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don't be a x-triple dot
                            Dec 31 '18 at 10:25






                          • 1




                            $begingroup$
                            172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:13










                          • $begingroup$
                            @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
                            $endgroup$
                            – ElPedro
                            Dec 31 '18 at 12:15










                          1




                          1




                          $begingroup$
                          178 bytes.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Don't be a x-triple dot
                          Dec 31 '18 at 10:25




                          $begingroup$
                          178 bytes.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Don't be a x-triple dot
                          Dec 31 '18 at 10:25




                          1




                          1




                          $begingroup$
                          172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ElPedro
                          Dec 31 '18 at 12:13




                          $begingroup$
                          172 bytes. A program is cheaper than a function.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ElPedro
                          Dec 31 '18 at 12:13












                          $begingroup$
                          @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ElPedro
                          Dec 31 '18 at 12:15






                          $begingroup$
                          @Mr.Xcoder - really like and{0}!=s. Was trying to find a way to shorten that condition but didn't think of that. My suggestion goes to 168 if I use that.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ElPedro
                          Dec 31 '18 at 12:15













                          0












                          $begingroup$


                          Clean, 152 bytes



                          import StdEnv,Data.List
                          $m n=sum[1\i<-subsequences[0..size m-1]|length i==n,j<-permutations i|case[m.[x,y]\x<-i&y<-j]of[u:v]=all((==)u)v&&u>0;_=1<0]/2


                          Try it online!



                          TIO driver takes n as a command-line argument and the matrix through STDIN (weights up to 9).



                          The actual function $ :: {#{#Int}} Int -> Int works with any size weights.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            0












                            $begingroup$


                            Clean, 152 bytes



                            import StdEnv,Data.List
                            $m n=sum[1\i<-subsequences[0..size m-1]|length i==n,j<-permutations i|case[m.[x,y]\x<-i&y<-j]of[u:v]=all((==)u)v&&u>0;_=1<0]/2


                            Try it online!



                            TIO driver takes n as a command-line argument and the matrix through STDIN (weights up to 9).



                            The actual function $ :: {#{#Int}} Int -> Int works with any size weights.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              0












                              0








                              0





                              $begingroup$


                              Clean, 152 bytes



                              import StdEnv,Data.List
                              $m n=sum[1\i<-subsequences[0..size m-1]|length i==n,j<-permutations i|case[m.[x,y]\x<-i&y<-j]of[u:v]=all((==)u)v&&u>0;_=1<0]/2


                              Try it online!



                              TIO driver takes n as a command-line argument and the matrix through STDIN (weights up to 9).



                              The actual function $ :: {#{#Int}} Int -> Int works with any size weights.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$




                              Clean, 152 bytes



                              import StdEnv,Data.List
                              $m n=sum[1\i<-subsequences[0..size m-1]|length i==n,j<-permutations i|case[m.[x,y]\x<-i&y<-j]of[u:v]=all((==)u)v&&u>0;_=1<0]/2


                              Try it online!



                              TIO driver takes n as a command-line argument and the matrix through STDIN (weights up to 9).



                              The actual function $ :: {#{#Int}} Int -> Int works with any size weights.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 30 '18 at 22:26









                              ΟurousΟurous

                              7,33111035




                              7,33111035























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$


                                  Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 90 bytes



                                  There is probably some room to further golf this, after some test cases are posted.



                                  We construct a graph from the unitized adjacency matrix, and then use the FindClique function with All as the third argument to list out the vertices with complete subgraphs. We then select the submatrices of the original input corresponding to the cliques (which will have zeros along the diagonal) and count the number of distinct elements which should be 2 if the weights are equal.



                                  In this implementation, self connections can have a weight other than zero and the graph will still be considered complete and equal weighted, so long as the weights of all self connections in the subgraph are identical.



                                  Count[Length@*Union@@@(b[[#,#]]&/@FindClique[AdjacencyGraph[Unitize/@(b=#)],{#2},All]),2]&


                                  Try it online!






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$


                                    Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 90 bytes



                                    There is probably some room to further golf this, after some test cases are posted.



                                    We construct a graph from the unitized adjacency matrix, and then use the FindClique function with All as the third argument to list out the vertices with complete subgraphs. We then select the submatrices of the original input corresponding to the cliques (which will have zeros along the diagonal) and count the number of distinct elements which should be 2 if the weights are equal.



                                    In this implementation, self connections can have a weight other than zero and the graph will still be considered complete and equal weighted, so long as the weights of all self connections in the subgraph are identical.



                                    Count[Length@*Union@@@(b[[#,#]]&/@FindClique[AdjacencyGraph[Unitize/@(b=#)],{#2},All]),2]&


                                    Try it online!






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$


                                      Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 90 bytes



                                      There is probably some room to further golf this, after some test cases are posted.



                                      We construct a graph from the unitized adjacency matrix, and then use the FindClique function with All as the third argument to list out the vertices with complete subgraphs. We then select the submatrices of the original input corresponding to the cliques (which will have zeros along the diagonal) and count the number of distinct elements which should be 2 if the weights are equal.



                                      In this implementation, self connections can have a weight other than zero and the graph will still be considered complete and equal weighted, so long as the weights of all self connections in the subgraph are identical.



                                      Count[Length@*Union@@@(b[[#,#]]&/@FindClique[AdjacencyGraph[Unitize/@(b=#)],{#2},All]),2]&


                                      Try it online!






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$




                                      Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 90 bytes



                                      There is probably some room to further golf this, after some test cases are posted.



                                      We construct a graph from the unitized adjacency matrix, and then use the FindClique function with All as the third argument to list out the vertices with complete subgraphs. We then select the submatrices of the original input corresponding to the cliques (which will have zeros along the diagonal) and count the number of distinct elements which should be 2 if the weights are equal.



                                      In this implementation, self connections can have a weight other than zero and the graph will still be considered complete and equal weighted, so long as the weights of all self connections in the subgraph are identical.



                                      Count[Length@*Union@@@(b[[#,#]]&/@FindClique[AdjacencyGraph[Unitize/@(b=#)],{#2},All]),2]&


                                      Try it online!







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 31 '18 at 22:03









                                      Kelly LowderKelly Lowder

                                      3,020417




                                      3,020417






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                          • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                          • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                            Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                          • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                          More generally…




                                          • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                          • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).





                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f178147%2ffind-equally-weighted-complete-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Bressuire

                                          Cabo Verde

                                          Gyllenstierna