My visual interpretation of $1+2+3+ dots +n$
$begingroup$
To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.
Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.
Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!


summation visualization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.
Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.
Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!


summation visualization
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.
Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.
Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!


summation visualization
$endgroup$
To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.
Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.
Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!


summation visualization
summation visualization
edited Dec 25 '18 at 14:35
Shaun
9,083113683
9,083113683
asked Dec 25 '18 at 14:05
user629248
$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16
$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?
Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$
$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052137%2fmy-visual-interpretation-of-123-dots-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?
Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$
$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?
Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$
$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?
Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$
$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$
$endgroup$
Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?
Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$
$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$
edited Dec 25 '18 at 14:34
Shaun
9,083113683
9,083113683
answered Dec 25 '18 at 14:12
ideaidea
2,15841125
2,15841125
2
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
2
2
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052137%2fmy-visual-interpretation-of-123-dots-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39