My visual interpretation of $1+2+3+ dots +n$












12












$begingroup$


To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.

Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.



Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Dec 25 '18 at 14:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
















12












$begingroup$


To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.

Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.



Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Dec 25 '18 at 14:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:39














12












12








12


2



$begingroup$


To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.

Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.



Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




To be frank, I didn't learn any sort of proof for this (visual or non-visual), so I came up with this proof through trial and error.

Moreover, I haven't checked my proof online yet, therefore I am not sure if I am the first one to come up with this proof - Nonetheless, it is still quite a remarkable proof, at least for me :D.



Hope you will appreciate my visual proof from below!



enter image description here



enter image description here







summation visualization






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 25 '18 at 14:35









Shaun

9,083113683




9,083113683










asked Dec 25 '18 at 14:05







user629248



















  • $begingroup$
    Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Dec 25 '18 at 14:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:39


















  • $begingroup$
    Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Dec 25 '18 at 14:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:39
















$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16






$begingroup$
Not bad, but it could be simpler math.stackexchange.com/questions/50485/… math.stackexchange.com/a/34400/312
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Dec 25 '18 at 14:16






1




1




$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39




$begingroup$
I'm not sure that offering alternative proofs actually counts as commenting on the poster's one? (Just pointing that out before everyone, myself included, jumps in with their favourite proof and ignores the question!)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?



Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$




$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:33










  • $begingroup$
    @timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
    $endgroup$
    – idea
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:16










  • $begingroup$
    It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:33













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052137%2fmy-visual-interpretation-of-123-dots-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown
























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?



Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$




$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:33










  • $begingroup$
    @timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
    $endgroup$
    – idea
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:16










  • $begingroup$
    It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:33


















4












$begingroup$

Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?



Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$




$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:33










  • $begingroup$
    @timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
    $endgroup$
    – idea
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:16










  • $begingroup$
    It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
















4












4








4





$begingroup$

Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?



Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$




$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Not quite visual, but won't this be simpler?



Write:$$S=1+2+3+dots +(n-1)+n$$
Reciprocate the order of terms:
$$S=n+(n-1)+dots +3+2+1$$
Add both: $$2S=underbrace{(n+1)+(n+1)+dots +(n+1)}_{n text{ times}}$$
$$2S=ncdot(n+1)$$




$$S=frac{ncdot(n+1)}2$$








share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 25 '18 at 14:34









Shaun

9,083113683




9,083113683










answered Dec 25 '18 at 14:12









ideaidea

2,15841125




2,15841125








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:33










  • $begingroup$
    @timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
    $endgroup$
    – idea
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:16










  • $begingroup$
    It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:33
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:33










  • $begingroup$
    @timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
    $endgroup$
    – idea
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:16










  • $begingroup$
    It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:33










2




2




$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33




$begingroup$
And this is equivalent to the visual proof where an $n×(n+1)$ rectangle is broken into two "jagged triangles" in like fashion.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 16:33












$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16




$begingroup$
@timtfj True! Didn't strike me then... :-/
$endgroup$
– idea
Dec 25 '18 at 17:16












$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33






$begingroup$
It's Christmas day. One's allowed not to notice things ;-) I think it struck me as a result of looking at the questioner's diagram and seeing a zigzag line.
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Dec 25 '18 at 18:33




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052137%2fmy-visual-interpretation-of-123-dots-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Måne

Storängen

VLT Carioca