Population dynamics, square root and zero derivative
$begingroup$
Hy everybody !
I'm studying population dynamics for my calculus exam, and I don't understand something that seems really easy, so I thought you might be able to help me out ;)
Here's the thing. I have this differential equation $frac{dN}{dt} = sqrt{N}$.
Our book makes us realize that both $N(t) = 0$ and $N(t) = frac{t^2}{4}$ are solution, which makes sense so far, simply by replacing in the original equation.
Now suppose we start at $N(0) = 0$. How can $N$ start growing like $frac{t^2}{4}$ if it's derivative is $0$ at $t = 0$ ? Because zero derivative should mean no growth, so $sqrt{N}$ should remain zero, which means still no growth, and so on. My brain is melting right now.
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hy everybody !
I'm studying population dynamics for my calculus exam, and I don't understand something that seems really easy, so I thought you might be able to help me out ;)
Here's the thing. I have this differential equation $frac{dN}{dt} = sqrt{N}$.
Our book makes us realize that both $N(t) = 0$ and $N(t) = frac{t^2}{4}$ are solution, which makes sense so far, simply by replacing in the original equation.
Now suppose we start at $N(0) = 0$. How can $N$ start growing like $frac{t^2}{4}$ if it's derivative is $0$ at $t = 0$ ? Because zero derivative should mean no growth, so $sqrt{N}$ should remain zero, which means still no growth, and so on. My brain is melting right now.
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is just how the continuous world works. There are well-known sufficient conditions for a differential equation to have a unique solution with given initial conditions, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/2446758/… This is not one of those equations.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
If it puzzles you that population grows after $ t=0$, although the derivative is zero, just remember the necessary condition of a maximum/minimum: the derivative is zero at these points as well, so maybe it helps to consider the start in $ t=0 $ as a minimum as well - which does not contradict a later growth.
$endgroup$
– Maksim
Dec 31 '18 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hy everybody !
I'm studying population dynamics for my calculus exam, and I don't understand something that seems really easy, so I thought you might be able to help me out ;)
Here's the thing. I have this differential equation $frac{dN}{dt} = sqrt{N}$.
Our book makes us realize that both $N(t) = 0$ and $N(t) = frac{t^2}{4}$ are solution, which makes sense so far, simply by replacing in the original equation.
Now suppose we start at $N(0) = 0$. How can $N$ start growing like $frac{t^2}{4}$ if it's derivative is $0$ at $t = 0$ ? Because zero derivative should mean no growth, so $sqrt{N}$ should remain zero, which means still no growth, and so on. My brain is melting right now.
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
Hy everybody !
I'm studying population dynamics for my calculus exam, and I don't understand something that seems really easy, so I thought you might be able to help me out ;)
Here's the thing. I have this differential equation $frac{dN}{dt} = sqrt{N}$.
Our book makes us realize that both $N(t) = 0$ and $N(t) = frac{t^2}{4}$ are solution, which makes sense so far, simply by replacing in the original equation.
Now suppose we start at $N(0) = 0$. How can $N$ start growing like $frac{t^2}{4}$ if it's derivative is $0$ at $t = 0$ ? Because zero derivative should mean no growth, so $sqrt{N}$ should remain zero, which means still no growth, and so on. My brain is melting right now.
ordinary-differential-equations
ordinary-differential-equations
asked Dec 31 '18 at 8:42
Diego HoutartDiego Houtart
275
275
$begingroup$
That is just how the continuous world works. There are well-known sufficient conditions for a differential equation to have a unique solution with given initial conditions, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/2446758/… This is not one of those equations.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
If it puzzles you that population grows after $ t=0$, although the derivative is zero, just remember the necessary condition of a maximum/minimum: the derivative is zero at these points as well, so maybe it helps to consider the start in $ t=0 $ as a minimum as well - which does not contradict a later growth.
$endgroup$
– Maksim
Dec 31 '18 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is just how the continuous world works. There are well-known sufficient conditions for a differential equation to have a unique solution with given initial conditions, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/2446758/… This is not one of those equations.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
If it puzzles you that population grows after $ t=0$, although the derivative is zero, just remember the necessary condition of a maximum/minimum: the derivative is zero at these points as well, so maybe it helps to consider the start in $ t=0 $ as a minimum as well - which does not contradict a later growth.
$endgroup$
– Maksim
Dec 31 '18 at 12:07
$begingroup$
That is just how the continuous world works. There are well-known sufficient conditions for a differential equation to have a unique solution with given initial conditions, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/2446758/… This is not one of those equations.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
That is just how the continuous world works. There are well-known sufficient conditions for a differential equation to have a unique solution with given initial conditions, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/2446758/… This is not one of those equations.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
If it puzzles you that population grows after $ t=0$, although the derivative is zero, just remember the necessary condition of a maximum/minimum: the derivative is zero at these points as well, so maybe it helps to consider the start in $ t=0 $ as a minimum as well - which does not contradict a later growth.
$endgroup$
– Maksim
Dec 31 '18 at 12:07
$begingroup$
If it puzzles you that population grows after $ t=0$, although the derivative is zero, just remember the necessary condition of a maximum/minimum: the derivative is zero at these points as well, so maybe it helps to consider the start in $ t=0 $ as a minimum as well - which does not contradict a later growth.
$endgroup$
– Maksim
Dec 31 '18 at 12:07
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Apart from these two solutions you can also combine them to solutions that are zero up to some point $tle c$ and then follow the shifted quadratic function, $N(t)=frac14(t-c)^2$ for $t>c$.
The irritation you get is based on the mis-understanding of what it means that a derivative is zero. It just means that $N(h)=o(h)$ for $happrox 0$.
If the differential equation were Lipschitz-continuous, small deviations of this size in any consistent integration method advancing with step size $h$ add up to an error that is still small for the whole solution. In other words, the Euler method and every other consistent method converges towards the unique exact solution. This would still be true if one were to introduce artificial random perturbations of size $h^2$.
In this case however, a small initial error gets magnified into a different solution. If one takes the Euler method with random perturbations, $N_{k+1}=N_k+hf(N_k)+h^2r_k$, the numerical solution will rapidly move away from the unstable zero solution and follow closely the other $N(t)=frac14(t-c)_+^2$, with a higher probability for $c$ being close to zero.

def Euler(f,t):
y = np.zeros_like(t);
for k in range(1,len(t)):
h=t[k]-t[k-1];
y[k]=y[k-1]+h*f(y[k-1])+h**2*(np.random.random()-0.5)
return y
t = np.linspace(0,2,41);
plt.subplot(2,1,1); plt.title("Non-Lipschitz: $y'=sqrt{|y|}$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: abs(y)**0.5, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid();
plt.subplot(2,1,2); plt.title("Lipschitz: $y'=0.5y+0.3$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: 0.5*y+0.3, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid(); plt.show()
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zero derivative at one point does not mean no growth at other points.
For example the derivative of function $$N(t)=frac {t^2}{4}$$ is $$N'(t)=t/2$$ That is the derivative is zero at $t=0$ but it is not zero at other points. The point of the problem is that in this case the solution is not unique.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct. There are indeed two solutions. If the population is zero it will stay zero. The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive. However, the population zero solution is "unstable" in the sense that even if the initial condition is slightly positive, the $t^2$ solution will kick in and push the population away from zero.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057517%2fpopulation-dynamics-square-root-and-zero-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Apart from these two solutions you can also combine them to solutions that are zero up to some point $tle c$ and then follow the shifted quadratic function, $N(t)=frac14(t-c)^2$ for $t>c$.
The irritation you get is based on the mis-understanding of what it means that a derivative is zero. It just means that $N(h)=o(h)$ for $happrox 0$.
If the differential equation were Lipschitz-continuous, small deviations of this size in any consistent integration method advancing with step size $h$ add up to an error that is still small for the whole solution. In other words, the Euler method and every other consistent method converges towards the unique exact solution. This would still be true if one were to introduce artificial random perturbations of size $h^2$.
In this case however, a small initial error gets magnified into a different solution. If one takes the Euler method with random perturbations, $N_{k+1}=N_k+hf(N_k)+h^2r_k$, the numerical solution will rapidly move away from the unstable zero solution and follow closely the other $N(t)=frac14(t-c)_+^2$, with a higher probability for $c$ being close to zero.

def Euler(f,t):
y = np.zeros_like(t);
for k in range(1,len(t)):
h=t[k]-t[k-1];
y[k]=y[k-1]+h*f(y[k-1])+h**2*(np.random.random()-0.5)
return y
t = np.linspace(0,2,41);
plt.subplot(2,1,1); plt.title("Non-Lipschitz: $y'=sqrt{|y|}$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: abs(y)**0.5, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid();
plt.subplot(2,1,2); plt.title("Lipschitz: $y'=0.5y+0.3$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: 0.5*y+0.3, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid(); plt.show()
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Apart from these two solutions you can also combine them to solutions that are zero up to some point $tle c$ and then follow the shifted quadratic function, $N(t)=frac14(t-c)^2$ for $t>c$.
The irritation you get is based on the mis-understanding of what it means that a derivative is zero. It just means that $N(h)=o(h)$ for $happrox 0$.
If the differential equation were Lipschitz-continuous, small deviations of this size in any consistent integration method advancing with step size $h$ add up to an error that is still small for the whole solution. In other words, the Euler method and every other consistent method converges towards the unique exact solution. This would still be true if one were to introduce artificial random perturbations of size $h^2$.
In this case however, a small initial error gets magnified into a different solution. If one takes the Euler method with random perturbations, $N_{k+1}=N_k+hf(N_k)+h^2r_k$, the numerical solution will rapidly move away from the unstable zero solution and follow closely the other $N(t)=frac14(t-c)_+^2$, with a higher probability for $c$ being close to zero.

def Euler(f,t):
y = np.zeros_like(t);
for k in range(1,len(t)):
h=t[k]-t[k-1];
y[k]=y[k-1]+h*f(y[k-1])+h**2*(np.random.random()-0.5)
return y
t = np.linspace(0,2,41);
plt.subplot(2,1,1); plt.title("Non-Lipschitz: $y'=sqrt{|y|}$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: abs(y)**0.5, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid();
plt.subplot(2,1,2); plt.title("Lipschitz: $y'=0.5y+0.3$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: 0.5*y+0.3, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid(); plt.show()
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Apart from these two solutions you can also combine them to solutions that are zero up to some point $tle c$ and then follow the shifted quadratic function, $N(t)=frac14(t-c)^2$ for $t>c$.
The irritation you get is based on the mis-understanding of what it means that a derivative is zero. It just means that $N(h)=o(h)$ for $happrox 0$.
If the differential equation were Lipschitz-continuous, small deviations of this size in any consistent integration method advancing with step size $h$ add up to an error that is still small for the whole solution. In other words, the Euler method and every other consistent method converges towards the unique exact solution. This would still be true if one were to introduce artificial random perturbations of size $h^2$.
In this case however, a small initial error gets magnified into a different solution. If one takes the Euler method with random perturbations, $N_{k+1}=N_k+hf(N_k)+h^2r_k$, the numerical solution will rapidly move away from the unstable zero solution and follow closely the other $N(t)=frac14(t-c)_+^2$, with a higher probability for $c$ being close to zero.

def Euler(f,t):
y = np.zeros_like(t);
for k in range(1,len(t)):
h=t[k]-t[k-1];
y[k]=y[k-1]+h*f(y[k-1])+h**2*(np.random.random()-0.5)
return y
t = np.linspace(0,2,41);
plt.subplot(2,1,1); plt.title("Non-Lipschitz: $y'=sqrt{|y|}$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: abs(y)**0.5, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid();
plt.subplot(2,1,2); plt.title("Lipschitz: $y'=0.5y+0.3$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: 0.5*y+0.3, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid(); plt.show()
$endgroup$
Apart from these two solutions you can also combine them to solutions that are zero up to some point $tle c$ and then follow the shifted quadratic function, $N(t)=frac14(t-c)^2$ for $t>c$.
The irritation you get is based on the mis-understanding of what it means that a derivative is zero. It just means that $N(h)=o(h)$ for $happrox 0$.
If the differential equation were Lipschitz-continuous, small deviations of this size in any consistent integration method advancing with step size $h$ add up to an error that is still small for the whole solution. In other words, the Euler method and every other consistent method converges towards the unique exact solution. This would still be true if one were to introduce artificial random perturbations of size $h^2$.
In this case however, a small initial error gets magnified into a different solution. If one takes the Euler method with random perturbations, $N_{k+1}=N_k+hf(N_k)+h^2r_k$, the numerical solution will rapidly move away from the unstable zero solution and follow closely the other $N(t)=frac14(t-c)_+^2$, with a higher probability for $c$ being close to zero.

def Euler(f,t):
y = np.zeros_like(t);
for k in range(1,len(t)):
h=t[k]-t[k-1];
y[k]=y[k-1]+h*f(y[k-1])+h**2*(np.random.random()-0.5)
return y
t = np.linspace(0,2,41);
plt.subplot(2,1,1); plt.title("Non-Lipschitz: $y'=sqrt{|y|}$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: abs(y)**0.5, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid();
plt.subplot(2,1,2); plt.title("Lipschitz: $y'=0.5y+0.3$")
for k in range(15): y=Euler(lambda y: 0.5*y+0.3, t); plt.plot(t,y);
plt.grid(); plt.show()
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:04
answered Dec 31 '18 at 10:35
LutzLLutzL
59.1k42056
59.1k42056
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zero derivative at one point does not mean no growth at other points.
For example the derivative of function $$N(t)=frac {t^2}{4}$$ is $$N'(t)=t/2$$ That is the derivative is zero at $t=0$ but it is not zero at other points. The point of the problem is that in this case the solution is not unique.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zero derivative at one point does not mean no growth at other points.
For example the derivative of function $$N(t)=frac {t^2}{4}$$ is $$N'(t)=t/2$$ That is the derivative is zero at $t=0$ but it is not zero at other points. The point of the problem is that in this case the solution is not unique.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zero derivative at one point does not mean no growth at other points.
For example the derivative of function $$N(t)=frac {t^2}{4}$$ is $$N'(t)=t/2$$ That is the derivative is zero at $t=0$ but it is not zero at other points. The point of the problem is that in this case the solution is not unique.
$endgroup$
Zero derivative at one point does not mean no growth at other points.
For example the derivative of function $$N(t)=frac {t^2}{4}$$ is $$N'(t)=t/2$$ That is the derivative is zero at $t=0$ but it is not zero at other points. The point of the problem is that in this case the solution is not unique.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 8:57
Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani
41.6k42061
41.6k42061
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct. There are indeed two solutions. If the population is zero it will stay zero. The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive. However, the population zero solution is "unstable" in the sense that even if the initial condition is slightly positive, the $t^2$ solution will kick in and push the population away from zero.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct. There are indeed two solutions. If the population is zero it will stay zero. The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive. However, the population zero solution is "unstable" in the sense that even if the initial condition is slightly positive, the $t^2$ solution will kick in and push the population away from zero.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct. There are indeed two solutions. If the population is zero it will stay zero. The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive. However, the population zero solution is "unstable" in the sense that even if the initial condition is slightly positive, the $t^2$ solution will kick in and push the population away from zero.
$endgroup$
You are correct. There are indeed two solutions. If the population is zero it will stay zero. The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive. However, the population zero solution is "unstable" in the sense that even if the initial condition is slightly positive, the $t^2$ solution will kick in and push the population away from zero.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 9:08
user617446user617446
4443
4443
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
The equation is also not well behaved, since $N(t) = t^2/4 , t>0, N(t) = 0 , tle 0 $ is also a solution; nothing mathematically prevents instantaneous growth from the 0 solution even if the solution has been 0 for all times before, which must add to the confusion of OP
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:22
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Then, in this case, how can $frac{t^2}{4}$ be a solution ? It means that at $t = 0$, $N(0)$ is exactly $0$ and so is $frac{dN}{dt}$, so $N$ should never grow, unlike $frac{t^2}{4}$. It looks like a contradiction to me :/
$endgroup$
– Diego Houtart
Dec 31 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
@DiegoHoutart you're deducing things from the function and derivative that you just simply can't. The function $t^2/4$ is exactly 0 at $t=0$, and so is its derivative, should it never grow?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Dec 31 '18 at 9:28
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
$begingroup$
"If the population is zero it will stay zero." Not true. "The only way it will grow is if the initial conditions are positive." Frankly wrong.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 31 '18 at 9:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057517%2fpopulation-dynamics-square-root-and-zero-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
That is just how the continuous world works. There are well-known sufficient conditions for a differential equation to have a unique solution with given initial conditions, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/2446758/… This is not one of those equations.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
If it puzzles you that population grows after $ t=0$, although the derivative is zero, just remember the necessary condition of a maximum/minimum: the derivative is zero at these points as well, so maybe it helps to consider the start in $ t=0 $ as a minimum as well - which does not contradict a later growth.
$endgroup$
– Maksim
Dec 31 '18 at 12:07