Homology of quotient of two copies of $mathbb S^2$.
$begingroup$
I have been trying to solve the following exercise. My knowledge of homology reduces to Mayer-Vietorius and relative homology, so I would like to know if the problem can be solved using these tools.
First of all to compute the homology groups of $X$, I used the Mayer-Vietorius long exact sequence. For that I considered the following sets $X_1 simeq S^2, X_2 simeq S^2$ enlarged versions of $A$ and $B$ so that their intersection is a set that can be deformated into the equator, that is $X_1 cap X_2 simeq S^1$. Computing the long exact sequence, the interesting part is the following one
$$cdotsrightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{3}big( X)}} rightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow } underset{ mathbb Z oplus mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^2) oplus {H_{2}big( mathbb S^2)}}} rightarrow H_2big(Xbig) rightarrow underset{mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{1}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow} 0 cdots
$$
As $mathbb Z$ is free this means that it splits so that $H_2(X) = H_1(mathbb S^1) oplus H_2(mathbb S^2) oplus H_2 (mathbb S^2)$. So the homology groups of $X$ are the following.
$$H_n(X) = left{ begin{array}{cl} mathbb{Z} & text{if} k=0 \
mathbb{Z^3} & text{if} k=2 \
0 & text{otherwise} end{array}right.$$
For the second part of the exercise I'm having a little bit more trouble. I tried using the relative homology exact sequence but it's not very inspiring. I couldn't quite understand what the inclusion $i_{*}:H_2(A) to H_2(X)$ does. So I tried to use that the pair $(X,A)$ is such that $H_n(X,A) simeq H_n(X/A)$ (I have to check that it is a strong deformation retract). This seems like a much better idea but I could not grasp what the space $X/A$ is. I'm thinking that it is $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $ as all the sphere $A$ is identified to the equator and then the equator is identified into a point. In that case it's the same as $mathbb S^2$ with the equator identified which seems to be $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $.
Thanks in advance!
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been trying to solve the following exercise. My knowledge of homology reduces to Mayer-Vietorius and relative homology, so I would like to know if the problem can be solved using these tools.
First of all to compute the homology groups of $X$, I used the Mayer-Vietorius long exact sequence. For that I considered the following sets $X_1 simeq S^2, X_2 simeq S^2$ enlarged versions of $A$ and $B$ so that their intersection is a set that can be deformated into the equator, that is $X_1 cap X_2 simeq S^1$. Computing the long exact sequence, the interesting part is the following one
$$cdotsrightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{3}big( X)}} rightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow } underset{ mathbb Z oplus mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^2) oplus {H_{2}big( mathbb S^2)}}} rightarrow H_2big(Xbig) rightarrow underset{mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{1}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow} 0 cdots
$$
As $mathbb Z$ is free this means that it splits so that $H_2(X) = H_1(mathbb S^1) oplus H_2(mathbb S^2) oplus H_2 (mathbb S^2)$. So the homology groups of $X$ are the following.
$$H_n(X) = left{ begin{array}{cl} mathbb{Z} & text{if} k=0 \
mathbb{Z^3} & text{if} k=2 \
0 & text{otherwise} end{array}right.$$
For the second part of the exercise I'm having a little bit more trouble. I tried using the relative homology exact sequence but it's not very inspiring. I couldn't quite understand what the inclusion $i_{*}:H_2(A) to H_2(X)$ does. So I tried to use that the pair $(X,A)$ is such that $H_n(X,A) simeq H_n(X/A)$ (I have to check that it is a strong deformation retract). This seems like a much better idea but I could not grasp what the space $X/A$ is. I'm thinking that it is $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $ as all the sphere $A$ is identified to the equator and then the equator is identified into a point. In that case it's the same as $mathbb S^2$ with the equator identified which seems to be $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $.
Thanks in advance!
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been trying to solve the following exercise. My knowledge of homology reduces to Mayer-Vietorius and relative homology, so I would like to know if the problem can be solved using these tools.
First of all to compute the homology groups of $X$, I used the Mayer-Vietorius long exact sequence. For that I considered the following sets $X_1 simeq S^2, X_2 simeq S^2$ enlarged versions of $A$ and $B$ so that their intersection is a set that can be deformated into the equator, that is $X_1 cap X_2 simeq S^1$. Computing the long exact sequence, the interesting part is the following one
$$cdotsrightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{3}big( X)}} rightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow } underset{ mathbb Z oplus mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^2) oplus {H_{2}big( mathbb S^2)}}} rightarrow H_2big(Xbig) rightarrow underset{mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{1}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow} 0 cdots
$$
As $mathbb Z$ is free this means that it splits so that $H_2(X) = H_1(mathbb S^1) oplus H_2(mathbb S^2) oplus H_2 (mathbb S^2)$. So the homology groups of $X$ are the following.
$$H_n(X) = left{ begin{array}{cl} mathbb{Z} & text{if} k=0 \
mathbb{Z^3} & text{if} k=2 \
0 & text{otherwise} end{array}right.$$
For the second part of the exercise I'm having a little bit more trouble. I tried using the relative homology exact sequence but it's not very inspiring. I couldn't quite understand what the inclusion $i_{*}:H_2(A) to H_2(X)$ does. So I tried to use that the pair $(X,A)$ is such that $H_n(X,A) simeq H_n(X/A)$ (I have to check that it is a strong deformation retract). This seems like a much better idea but I could not grasp what the space $X/A$ is. I'm thinking that it is $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $ as all the sphere $A$ is identified to the equator and then the equator is identified into a point. In that case it's the same as $mathbb S^2$ with the equator identified which seems to be $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $.
Thanks in advance!
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology
$endgroup$
I have been trying to solve the following exercise. My knowledge of homology reduces to Mayer-Vietorius and relative homology, so I would like to know if the problem can be solved using these tools.
First of all to compute the homology groups of $X$, I used the Mayer-Vietorius long exact sequence. For that I considered the following sets $X_1 simeq S^2, X_2 simeq S^2$ enlarged versions of $A$ and $B$ so that their intersection is a set that can be deformated into the equator, that is $X_1 cap X_2 simeq S^1$. Computing the long exact sequence, the interesting part is the following one
$$cdotsrightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{3}big( X)}} rightarrow underset{0} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow } underset{ mathbb Z oplus mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{2}big( mathbb S^2) oplus {H_{2}big( mathbb S^2)}}} rightarrow H_2big(Xbig) rightarrow underset{mathbb Z} {underbrace{H_{1}big( mathbb S^1)}} {rightarrow} 0 cdots
$$
As $mathbb Z$ is free this means that it splits so that $H_2(X) = H_1(mathbb S^1) oplus H_2(mathbb S^2) oplus H_2 (mathbb S^2)$. So the homology groups of $X$ are the following.
$$H_n(X) = left{ begin{array}{cl} mathbb{Z} & text{if} k=0 \
mathbb{Z^3} & text{if} k=2 \
0 & text{otherwise} end{array}right.$$
For the second part of the exercise I'm having a little bit more trouble. I tried using the relative homology exact sequence but it's not very inspiring. I couldn't quite understand what the inclusion $i_{*}:H_2(A) to H_2(X)$ does. So I tried to use that the pair $(X,A)$ is such that $H_n(X,A) simeq H_n(X/A)$ (I have to check that it is a strong deformation retract). This seems like a much better idea but I could not grasp what the space $X/A$ is. I'm thinking that it is $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $ as all the sphere $A$ is identified to the equator and then the equator is identified into a point. In that case it's the same as $mathbb S^2$ with the equator identified which seems to be $mathbb S^2 vee mathbb S^2 $.
Thanks in advance!
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology
edited Dec 17 '18 at 4:28
Leo Lerena
asked Dec 17 '18 at 4:04
Leo LerenaLeo Lerena
445511
445511
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your Mayer-Vietoris computation for $H_n(X)$ is correct. Alternatively, one can deduce this using the following chain of homotopy equivalences:
The first space is your space $X$: two spheres glued along their equators, which we are drawing with one sitting inside the other. The second space is a sphere glued to a cylinder along one of its equators. The third one is a cylinder with two middle caps and the last one is a wedge sum of three spheres. It is clear that the last space has the homology groups you described.
For the second half, let us write down the relevant bits of the long exact sequence. One of them is
$0to H_1(X,A)to H_0(A)to H_0(X)to 0,$
since you know that $H_1(X)=0$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$. Now $H_0(A)simeq H_0(X) simeq Bbb{Z}$, and the map between them is surjective and thus an isomorphism, so $H_1(X,A)=0$.
The other bit is
$0 to H_3(X,A)to H_2(A)to H_2(X)to H_2(X,A)to 0$
since you know $H_3(X)simeq H_1(A)=0$, and you also know that $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ and $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$. One may describe the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ explicitly, since it is the one induced by the inclusion. The map $sigma$ which radially expands a standard $2$-simplex to a $2$-sphere is a generator for $H_2(A)$. Similarly, if we suppose $A$ sits inside $X$ as in the drawing above, we may pick generators $x_1,x_2,x_3$ of $H_2(X)$ as in the following picture:
In this way, identifying $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$ by the map $x_i mapsto e_i$ and $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ by $sigmamapsto 1$, we see that the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ induces the map $Bbb{Z}to Bbb{Z}^3$ given by $1mapsto (0,1,0)$. Since this map is injective, $H_3(X,A)=0$, and moreover $H_1(X,A)simeq Bbb{Z}^3/langle (0,1,0)ranglesimeq Bbb{Z}^2$.
Your argument using that $H_n(X,A)simeq tilde{H}_n(X/A)$ (notice it is the reduced homology groups) is correct as well, and you may check that the homology groups computed above agree with this. To see that $X/A$ is homeomorphic to a wedge of spheres, note that the map $Xto S^2vee S^2$ taking the upper hemisphere of $B$ to all of one the spheres minus a single point, the lower hemisphere to the other sphere in a similar fashion and all of $A$ to the gluing point induces a continuous bijection $X/Ato S^2vee S^2$. Since $X/A$ is compact and $S^2vee S^2$ is Hausdorff, this is a homeomorphism.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043509%2fhomology-of-quotient-of-two-copies-of-mathbb-s2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your Mayer-Vietoris computation for $H_n(X)$ is correct. Alternatively, one can deduce this using the following chain of homotopy equivalences:
The first space is your space $X$: two spheres glued along their equators, which we are drawing with one sitting inside the other. The second space is a sphere glued to a cylinder along one of its equators. The third one is a cylinder with two middle caps and the last one is a wedge sum of three spheres. It is clear that the last space has the homology groups you described.
For the second half, let us write down the relevant bits of the long exact sequence. One of them is
$0to H_1(X,A)to H_0(A)to H_0(X)to 0,$
since you know that $H_1(X)=0$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$. Now $H_0(A)simeq H_0(X) simeq Bbb{Z}$, and the map between them is surjective and thus an isomorphism, so $H_1(X,A)=0$.
The other bit is
$0 to H_3(X,A)to H_2(A)to H_2(X)to H_2(X,A)to 0$
since you know $H_3(X)simeq H_1(A)=0$, and you also know that $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ and $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$. One may describe the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ explicitly, since it is the one induced by the inclusion. The map $sigma$ which radially expands a standard $2$-simplex to a $2$-sphere is a generator for $H_2(A)$. Similarly, if we suppose $A$ sits inside $X$ as in the drawing above, we may pick generators $x_1,x_2,x_3$ of $H_2(X)$ as in the following picture:
In this way, identifying $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$ by the map $x_i mapsto e_i$ and $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ by $sigmamapsto 1$, we see that the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ induces the map $Bbb{Z}to Bbb{Z}^3$ given by $1mapsto (0,1,0)$. Since this map is injective, $H_3(X,A)=0$, and moreover $H_1(X,A)simeq Bbb{Z}^3/langle (0,1,0)ranglesimeq Bbb{Z}^2$.
Your argument using that $H_n(X,A)simeq tilde{H}_n(X/A)$ (notice it is the reduced homology groups) is correct as well, and you may check that the homology groups computed above agree with this. To see that $X/A$ is homeomorphic to a wedge of spheres, note that the map $Xto S^2vee S^2$ taking the upper hemisphere of $B$ to all of one the spheres minus a single point, the lower hemisphere to the other sphere in a similar fashion and all of $A$ to the gluing point induces a continuous bijection $X/Ato S^2vee S^2$. Since $X/A$ is compact and $S^2vee S^2$ is Hausdorff, this is a homeomorphism.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your Mayer-Vietoris computation for $H_n(X)$ is correct. Alternatively, one can deduce this using the following chain of homotopy equivalences:
The first space is your space $X$: two spheres glued along their equators, which we are drawing with one sitting inside the other. The second space is a sphere glued to a cylinder along one of its equators. The third one is a cylinder with two middle caps and the last one is a wedge sum of three spheres. It is clear that the last space has the homology groups you described.
For the second half, let us write down the relevant bits of the long exact sequence. One of them is
$0to H_1(X,A)to H_0(A)to H_0(X)to 0,$
since you know that $H_1(X)=0$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$. Now $H_0(A)simeq H_0(X) simeq Bbb{Z}$, and the map between them is surjective and thus an isomorphism, so $H_1(X,A)=0$.
The other bit is
$0 to H_3(X,A)to H_2(A)to H_2(X)to H_2(X,A)to 0$
since you know $H_3(X)simeq H_1(A)=0$, and you also know that $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ and $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$. One may describe the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ explicitly, since it is the one induced by the inclusion. The map $sigma$ which radially expands a standard $2$-simplex to a $2$-sphere is a generator for $H_2(A)$. Similarly, if we suppose $A$ sits inside $X$ as in the drawing above, we may pick generators $x_1,x_2,x_3$ of $H_2(X)$ as in the following picture:
In this way, identifying $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$ by the map $x_i mapsto e_i$ and $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ by $sigmamapsto 1$, we see that the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ induces the map $Bbb{Z}to Bbb{Z}^3$ given by $1mapsto (0,1,0)$. Since this map is injective, $H_3(X,A)=0$, and moreover $H_1(X,A)simeq Bbb{Z}^3/langle (0,1,0)ranglesimeq Bbb{Z}^2$.
Your argument using that $H_n(X,A)simeq tilde{H}_n(X/A)$ (notice it is the reduced homology groups) is correct as well, and you may check that the homology groups computed above agree with this. To see that $X/A$ is homeomorphic to a wedge of spheres, note that the map $Xto S^2vee S^2$ taking the upper hemisphere of $B$ to all of one the spheres minus a single point, the lower hemisphere to the other sphere in a similar fashion and all of $A$ to the gluing point induces a continuous bijection $X/Ato S^2vee S^2$. Since $X/A$ is compact and $S^2vee S^2$ is Hausdorff, this is a homeomorphism.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your Mayer-Vietoris computation for $H_n(X)$ is correct. Alternatively, one can deduce this using the following chain of homotopy equivalences:
The first space is your space $X$: two spheres glued along their equators, which we are drawing with one sitting inside the other. The second space is a sphere glued to a cylinder along one of its equators. The third one is a cylinder with two middle caps and the last one is a wedge sum of three spheres. It is clear that the last space has the homology groups you described.
For the second half, let us write down the relevant bits of the long exact sequence. One of them is
$0to H_1(X,A)to H_0(A)to H_0(X)to 0,$
since you know that $H_1(X)=0$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$. Now $H_0(A)simeq H_0(X) simeq Bbb{Z}$, and the map between them is surjective and thus an isomorphism, so $H_1(X,A)=0$.
The other bit is
$0 to H_3(X,A)to H_2(A)to H_2(X)to H_2(X,A)to 0$
since you know $H_3(X)simeq H_1(A)=0$, and you also know that $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ and $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$. One may describe the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ explicitly, since it is the one induced by the inclusion. The map $sigma$ which radially expands a standard $2$-simplex to a $2$-sphere is a generator for $H_2(A)$. Similarly, if we suppose $A$ sits inside $X$ as in the drawing above, we may pick generators $x_1,x_2,x_3$ of $H_2(X)$ as in the following picture:
In this way, identifying $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$ by the map $x_i mapsto e_i$ and $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ by $sigmamapsto 1$, we see that the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ induces the map $Bbb{Z}to Bbb{Z}^3$ given by $1mapsto (0,1,0)$. Since this map is injective, $H_3(X,A)=0$, and moreover $H_1(X,A)simeq Bbb{Z}^3/langle (0,1,0)ranglesimeq Bbb{Z}^2$.
Your argument using that $H_n(X,A)simeq tilde{H}_n(X/A)$ (notice it is the reduced homology groups) is correct as well, and you may check that the homology groups computed above agree with this. To see that $X/A$ is homeomorphic to a wedge of spheres, note that the map $Xto S^2vee S^2$ taking the upper hemisphere of $B$ to all of one the spheres minus a single point, the lower hemisphere to the other sphere in a similar fashion and all of $A$ to the gluing point induces a continuous bijection $X/Ato S^2vee S^2$. Since $X/A$ is compact and $S^2vee S^2$ is Hausdorff, this is a homeomorphism.
$endgroup$
Your Mayer-Vietoris computation for $H_n(X)$ is correct. Alternatively, one can deduce this using the following chain of homotopy equivalences:
The first space is your space $X$: two spheres glued along their equators, which we are drawing with one sitting inside the other. The second space is a sphere glued to a cylinder along one of its equators. The third one is a cylinder with two middle caps and the last one is a wedge sum of three spheres. It is clear that the last space has the homology groups you described.
For the second half, let us write down the relevant bits of the long exact sequence. One of them is
$0to H_1(X,A)to H_0(A)to H_0(X)to 0,$
since you know that $H_1(X)=0$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$. Now $H_0(A)simeq H_0(X) simeq Bbb{Z}$, and the map between them is surjective and thus an isomorphism, so $H_1(X,A)=0$.
The other bit is
$0 to H_3(X,A)to H_2(A)to H_2(X)to H_2(X,A)to 0$
since you know $H_3(X)simeq H_1(A)=0$, and you also know that $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ and $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$. One may describe the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ explicitly, since it is the one induced by the inclusion. The map $sigma$ which radially expands a standard $2$-simplex to a $2$-sphere is a generator for $H_2(A)$. Similarly, if we suppose $A$ sits inside $X$ as in the drawing above, we may pick generators $x_1,x_2,x_3$ of $H_2(X)$ as in the following picture:
In this way, identifying $H_2(X)simeq Bbb{Z}^3$ by the map $x_i mapsto e_i$ and $H_2(A)simeq Bbb{Z}$ by $sigmamapsto 1$, we see that the map $H_2(A)to H_2(X)$ induces the map $Bbb{Z}to Bbb{Z}^3$ given by $1mapsto (0,1,0)$. Since this map is injective, $H_3(X,A)=0$, and moreover $H_1(X,A)simeq Bbb{Z}^3/langle (0,1,0)ranglesimeq Bbb{Z}^2$.
Your argument using that $H_n(X,A)simeq tilde{H}_n(X/A)$ (notice it is the reduced homology groups) is correct as well, and you may check that the homology groups computed above agree with this. To see that $X/A$ is homeomorphic to a wedge of spheres, note that the map $Xto S^2vee S^2$ taking the upper hemisphere of $B$ to all of one the spheres minus a single point, the lower hemisphere to the other sphere in a similar fashion and all of $A$ to the gluing point induces a continuous bijection $X/Ato S^2vee S^2$. Since $X/A$ is compact and $S^2vee S^2$ is Hausdorff, this is a homeomorphism.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 15:43
F MF M
3,06152341
3,06152341
1
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
1
1
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Note that if we had picked $A$ to be the outermost sphere, the induced map would have been $1 mapsto (1,1,1)$, and the rest of the computation would have followed in the same way.
$endgroup$
– F M
Dec 17 '18 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Excellent as usual.
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 17 '18 at 19:36
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for taking your time to write this answer!
$endgroup$
– Leo Lerena
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043509%2fhomology-of-quotient-of-two-copies-of-mathbb-s2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown