On complex powers of complex numbers












2












$begingroup$


For $z,s in mathbb{C}$ and $zneq 0$, set $z^s = exp(s,log z)$ and $-pi < arg z leq pi$. In this setting, I am worried about the cases where I have to be careful in assuming $(z_1z_2)^s = (z_1)^s(z_2)^s$. As long as $s in mathbb{Z}$, I am safe, but what about the rest? For example, if $zin mathbb{H}$, then
begin{equation}
(-z)^s = e^{-pi is}z^s,
end{equation} but
begin{equation}
(-1)^sz^s = e^{pi i s}z^s
end{equation} and both are not equal.






complex-analysis complex-numbers modular-forms







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    For $z,s in mathbb{C}$ and $zneq 0$, set $z^s = exp(s,log z)$ and $-pi < arg z leq pi$. In this setting, I am worried about the cases where I have to be careful in assuming $(z_1z_2)^s = (z_1)^s(z_2)^s$. As long as $s in mathbb{Z}$, I am safe, but what about the rest? For example, if $zin mathbb{H}$, then
    begin{equation}
    (-z)^s = e^{-pi is}z^s,
    end{equation}     but
    begin{equation}
    (-1)^sz^s = e^{pi i s}z^s
    end{equation}     and both are not equal.






    complex-analysis complex-numbers modular-forms







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      For $z,s in mathbb{C}$ and $zneq 0$, set $z^s = exp(s,log z)$ and $-pi < arg z leq pi$. In this setting, I am worried about the cases where I have to be careful in assuming $(z_1z_2)^s = (z_1)^s(z_2)^s$. As long as $s in mathbb{Z}$, I am safe, but what about the rest? For example, if $zin mathbb{H}$, then
      begin{equation}
      (-z)^s = e^{-pi is}z^s,
      end{equation}       but
      begin{equation}
      (-1)^sz^s = e^{pi i s}z^s
      end{equation}       and both are not equal.






      complex-analysis complex-numbers modular-forms







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For $z,s in mathbb{C}$ and $zneq 0$, set $z^s = exp(s,log z)$ and $-pi < arg z leq pi$. In this setting, I am worried about the cases where I have to be careful in assuming $(z_1z_2)^s = (z_1)^s(z_2)^s$. As long as $s in mathbb{Z}$, I am safe, but what about the rest? For example, if $zin mathbb{H}$, then
      begin{equation}
      (-z)^s = e^{-pi is}z^s,
      end{equation}       but
      begin{equation}
      (-1)^sz^s = e^{pi i s}z^s
      end{equation}       and both are not equal.






      complex-analysis complex-numbers modular-forms




      complex-analysis complex-numbers modular-forms






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 17 '18 at 4:18









      Tianlalu

      3,08621038




      3,08621038










      asked Dec 17 '18 at 4:14









      user166305user166305

      1968




      1968






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The rule $(zw)^s=z^sw^s$ depends on the equality $log(zw)=log z+log w$. But you need the logarithm to be single valued, which requires limiting the argument to one interval, for instance $(-pi,pi]$ as you did; and this generates the following problem. If $t+u>pi$, then $log (e^{i(t+u)})=i(t+u-2pi)$. Thus when $s=a+ib$, $z_j=r_je^{it_j}$,
          begin{align}
          (z_1z_2)^s&=exp((a+ib)(log r_1r_2+ i(t_1+t_2-2kpi))\ \
          &=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2},e^{2bkpi},
          end{align}
          where $k=0$ if $t_1+t_2leqpi$, and $k=1$ when $t_1+t_2>pi$. On the other hand you have
          $$
          z_1^sz_2^s=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2}.
          $$
          The two expressions are equal when $t+uleqpi$, and differ by a factor of $e^{2bpi}$ when $t+u>pi$.



          In summary, $(z_1z_2)^s=z_1^s+z_2^s$ (in your setup) when $arg z_1+arg z_2leqpi$. This is not terrible, but it prevents you from using the formula in general, when you don't know the arguments of $z_1$ and $z_2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043519%2fon-complex-powers-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The rule $(zw)^s=z^sw^s$ depends on the equality $log(zw)=log z+log w$. But you need the logarithm to be single valued, which requires limiting the argument to one interval, for instance $(-pi,pi]$ as you did; and this generates the following problem. If $t+u>pi$, then $log (e^{i(t+u)})=i(t+u-2pi)$. Thus when $s=a+ib$, $z_j=r_je^{it_j}$,
            begin{align}
            (z_1z_2)^s&=exp((a+ib)(log r_1r_2+ i(t_1+t_2-2kpi))\ \
            &=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2},e^{2bkpi},
            end{align}
            where $k=0$ if $t_1+t_2leqpi$, and $k=1$ when $t_1+t_2>pi$. On the other hand you have
            $$
            z_1^sz_2^s=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2}.
            $$
            The two expressions are equal when $t+uleqpi$, and differ by a factor of $e^{2bpi}$ when $t+u>pi$.



            In summary, $(z_1z_2)^s=z_1^s+z_2^s$ (in your setup) when $arg z_1+arg z_2leqpi$. This is not terrible, but it prevents you from using the formula in general, when you don't know the arguments of $z_1$ and $z_2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              The rule $(zw)^s=z^sw^s$ depends on the equality $log(zw)=log z+log w$. But you need the logarithm to be single valued, which requires limiting the argument to one interval, for instance $(-pi,pi]$ as you did; and this generates the following problem. If $t+u>pi$, then $log (e^{i(t+u)})=i(t+u-2pi)$. Thus when $s=a+ib$, $z_j=r_je^{it_j}$,
              begin{align}
              (z_1z_2)^s&=exp((a+ib)(log r_1r_2+ i(t_1+t_2-2kpi))\ \
              &=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2},e^{2bkpi},
              end{align}
              where $k=0$ if $t_1+t_2leqpi$, and $k=1$ when $t_1+t_2>pi$. On the other hand you have
              $$
              z_1^sz_2^s=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2}.
              $$
              The two expressions are equal when $t+uleqpi$, and differ by a factor of $e^{2bpi}$ when $t+u>pi$.



              In summary, $(z_1z_2)^s=z_1^s+z_2^s$ (in your setup) when $arg z_1+arg z_2leqpi$. This is not terrible, but it prevents you from using the formula in general, when you don't know the arguments of $z_1$ and $z_2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The rule $(zw)^s=z^sw^s$ depends on the equality $log(zw)=log z+log w$. But you need the logarithm to be single valued, which requires limiting the argument to one interval, for instance $(-pi,pi]$ as you did; and this generates the following problem. If $t+u>pi$, then $log (e^{i(t+u)})=i(t+u-2pi)$. Thus when $s=a+ib$, $z_j=r_je^{it_j}$,
                begin{align}
                (z_1z_2)^s&=exp((a+ib)(log r_1r_2+ i(t_1+t_2-2kpi))\ \
                &=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2},e^{2bkpi},
                end{align}
                where $k=0$ if $t_1+t_2leqpi$, and $k=1$ when $t_1+t_2>pi$. On the other hand you have
                $$
                z_1^sz_2^s=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2}.
                $$
                The two expressions are equal when $t+uleqpi$, and differ by a factor of $e^{2bpi}$ when $t+u>pi$.



                In summary, $(z_1z_2)^s=z_1^s+z_2^s$ (in your setup) when $arg z_1+arg z_2leqpi$. This is not terrible, but it prevents you from using the formula in general, when you don't know the arguments of $z_1$ and $z_2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The rule $(zw)^s=z^sw^s$ depends on the equality $log(zw)=log z+log w$. But you need the logarithm to be single valued, which requires limiting the argument to one interval, for instance $(-pi,pi]$ as you did; and this generates the following problem. If $t+u>pi$, then $log (e^{i(t+u)})=i(t+u-2pi)$. Thus when $s=a+ib$, $z_j=r_je^{it_j}$,
                begin{align}
                (z_1z_2)^s&=exp((a+ib)(log r_1r_2+ i(t_1+t_2-2kpi))\ \
                &=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2},e^{2bkpi},
                end{align}
                where $k=0$ if $t_1+t_2leqpi$, and $k=1$ when $t_1+t_2>pi$. On the other hand you have
                $$
                z_1^sz_2^s=r_1^ar_2^a,e^{iblog r_1},e^{iblog r_2},e^{iat_1},e^{iat_2},e^{-bt_1},e^{-bt_2}.
                $$
                The two expressions are equal when $t+uleqpi$, and differ by a factor of $e^{2bpi}$ when $t+u>pi$.



                In summary, $(z_1z_2)^s=z_1^s+z_2^s$ (in your setup) when $arg z_1+arg z_2leqpi$. This is not terrible, but it prevents you from using the formula in general, when you don't know the arguments of $z_1$ and $z_2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 17 '18 at 4:51









                Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

                125k1178178




                125k1178178






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043519%2fon-complex-powers-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Image
                    .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
                    Read more

                    Cabo Verde

                    Image
                      Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º) ...
                    Read more

                    Gyllenstierna

                    Image
                    .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
                    Read more