Prove that the set used in archimedean property is closed












-1












$begingroup$


Let $x$ be a positive real number. Show that the set
${nx:ninBbb N}$ is closed in $Bbb R$.



What I tried to do is that consider the function $f (x)=nx$ which is continuous in $Bbb R$ and tried to show that $g (x)=f (x)-nx$ greater than $0$ or less than $0$ is an open set.



Is my approach right ?



Please help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I dk what you are thinking. If $f(x)=x$ then $0=nx-nx=f(x)-nx=g(x).$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:26


















-1












$begingroup$


Let $x$ be a positive real number. Show that the set
${nx:ninBbb N}$ is closed in $Bbb R$.



What I tried to do is that consider the function $f (x)=nx$ which is continuous in $Bbb R$ and tried to show that $g (x)=f (x)-nx$ greater than $0$ or less than $0$ is an open set.



Is my approach right ?



Please help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I dk what you are thinking. If $f(x)=x$ then $0=nx-nx=f(x)-nx=g(x).$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:26
















-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


Let $x$ be a positive real number. Show that the set
${nx:ninBbb N}$ is closed in $Bbb R$.



What I tried to do is that consider the function $f (x)=nx$ which is continuous in $Bbb R$ and tried to show that $g (x)=f (x)-nx$ greater than $0$ or less than $0$ is an open set.



Is my approach right ?



Please help!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $x$ be a positive real number. Show that the set
${nx:ninBbb N}$ is closed in $Bbb R$.



What I tried to do is that consider the function $f (x)=nx$ which is continuous in $Bbb R$ and tried to show that $g (x)=f (x)-nx$ greater than $0$ or less than $0$ is an open set.



Is my approach right ?



Please help!







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 17 '18 at 4:12









Tianlalu

3,08621038




3,08621038










asked Dec 17 '18 at 4:07









Debarghya MukherjeeDebarghya Mukherjee

352




352












  • $begingroup$
    I dk what you are thinking. If $f(x)=x$ then $0=nx-nx=f(x)-nx=g(x).$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:26




















  • $begingroup$
    I dk what you are thinking. If $f(x)=x$ then $0=nx-nx=f(x)-nx=g(x).$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:26


















$begingroup$
I dk what you are thinking. If $f(x)=x$ then $0=nx-nx=f(x)-nx=g(x).$
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 6:26






$begingroup$
I dk what you are thinking. If $f(x)=x$ then $0=nx-nx=f(x)-nx=g(x).$
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 6:26












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

You have a couple options:



1) Show the compliment is open.
That’s is, the set $mathbb{R}setminus mathbb{xN}$ is open. This is easy since every number in this set can reside in a ball of radius smaller than the nearest $nx$. This might need to be done using two separate cases: $x = 0$ and $x not = 0$.



Clearly the first case is easy. The second is slightly harder.



2) Show the set contains all its limit points.
This might be a bit harder.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So do we need to apply archime dean property
    $endgroup$
    – Debarghya Mukherjee
    Dec 17 '18 at 4:33










  • $begingroup$
    For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
    $endgroup$
    – gdepaul
    Dec 17 '18 at 4:36












  • $begingroup$
    Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:21



















0












$begingroup$

(gdepaul's answer contains suggestions for alternate approaches. This one focuses on the idea laid out in the question)



And where would you go from there? You went from a fixed $x$ and an infinite collection of $n$ to a fixed $n$ and variable $x$; to recover the set we care about, we would have to take an intersection of infinitely many versions. That - well, an intersection of infinitely many open sets is not necessarily open.



I don't see this approach working.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043511%2fprove-that-the-set-used-in-archimedean-property-is-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    You have a couple options:



    1) Show the compliment is open.
    That’s is, the set $mathbb{R}setminus mathbb{xN}$ is open. This is easy since every number in this set can reside in a ball of radius smaller than the nearest $nx$. This might need to be done using two separate cases: $x = 0$ and $x not = 0$.



    Clearly the first case is easy. The second is slightly harder.



    2) Show the set contains all its limit points.
    This might be a bit harder.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So do we need to apply archime dean property
      $endgroup$
      – Debarghya Mukherjee
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:33










    • $begingroup$
      For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
      $endgroup$
      – gdepaul
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:36












    • $begingroup$
      Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
      $endgroup$
      – DanielWainfleet
      Dec 17 '18 at 6:21
















    0












    $begingroup$

    You have a couple options:



    1) Show the compliment is open.
    That’s is, the set $mathbb{R}setminus mathbb{xN}$ is open. This is easy since every number in this set can reside in a ball of radius smaller than the nearest $nx$. This might need to be done using two separate cases: $x = 0$ and $x not = 0$.



    Clearly the first case is easy. The second is slightly harder.



    2) Show the set contains all its limit points.
    This might be a bit harder.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So do we need to apply archime dean property
      $endgroup$
      – Debarghya Mukherjee
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:33










    • $begingroup$
      For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
      $endgroup$
      – gdepaul
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:36












    • $begingroup$
      Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
      $endgroup$
      – DanielWainfleet
      Dec 17 '18 at 6:21














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    You have a couple options:



    1) Show the compliment is open.
    That’s is, the set $mathbb{R}setminus mathbb{xN}$ is open. This is easy since every number in this set can reside in a ball of radius smaller than the nearest $nx$. This might need to be done using two separate cases: $x = 0$ and $x not = 0$.



    Clearly the first case is easy. The second is slightly harder.



    2) Show the set contains all its limit points.
    This might be a bit harder.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You have a couple options:



    1) Show the compliment is open.
    That’s is, the set $mathbb{R}setminus mathbb{xN}$ is open. This is easy since every number in this set can reside in a ball of radius smaller than the nearest $nx$. This might need to be done using two separate cases: $x = 0$ and $x not = 0$.



    Clearly the first case is easy. The second is slightly harder.



    2) Show the set contains all its limit points.
    This might be a bit harder.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 17 '18 at 4:23









    gdepaulgdepaul

    613




    613












    • $begingroup$
      So do we need to apply archime dean property
      $endgroup$
      – Debarghya Mukherjee
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:33










    • $begingroup$
      For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
      $endgroup$
      – gdepaul
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:36












    • $begingroup$
      Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
      $endgroup$
      – DanielWainfleet
      Dec 17 '18 at 6:21


















    • $begingroup$
      So do we need to apply archime dean property
      $endgroup$
      – Debarghya Mukherjee
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:33










    • $begingroup$
      For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
      $endgroup$
      – gdepaul
      Dec 17 '18 at 4:36












    • $begingroup$
      Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
      $endgroup$
      – DanielWainfleet
      Dec 17 '18 at 6:21
















    $begingroup$
    So do we need to apply archime dean property
    $endgroup$
    – Debarghya Mukherjee
    Dec 17 '18 at 4:33




    $begingroup$
    So do we need to apply archime dean property
    $endgroup$
    – Debarghya Mukherjee
    Dec 17 '18 at 4:33












    $begingroup$
    For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
    $endgroup$
    – gdepaul
    Dec 17 '18 at 4:36






    $begingroup$
    For the case x is not zero, then we take a number in the set R N, say y. Now dividing that number by x, we get, y/x. By the Archimedean property, there exist n such that n <= y/x <= n+1. So xn <= y <= x(n+1). Now you just need to show that this y is in an open ball
    $endgroup$
    – gdepaul
    Dec 17 '18 at 4:36














    $begingroup$
    Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:21




    $begingroup$
    Complement, not compliment. Related to the word "complete".
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 6:21











    0












    $begingroup$

    (gdepaul's answer contains suggestions for alternate approaches. This one focuses on the idea laid out in the question)



    And where would you go from there? You went from a fixed $x$ and an infinite collection of $n$ to a fixed $n$ and variable $x$; to recover the set we care about, we would have to take an intersection of infinitely many versions. That - well, an intersection of infinitely many open sets is not necessarily open.



    I don't see this approach working.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      (gdepaul's answer contains suggestions for alternate approaches. This one focuses on the idea laid out in the question)



      And where would you go from there? You went from a fixed $x$ and an infinite collection of $n$ to a fixed $n$ and variable $x$; to recover the set we care about, we would have to take an intersection of infinitely many versions. That - well, an intersection of infinitely many open sets is not necessarily open.



      I don't see this approach working.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        (gdepaul's answer contains suggestions for alternate approaches. This one focuses on the idea laid out in the question)



        And where would you go from there? You went from a fixed $x$ and an infinite collection of $n$ to a fixed $n$ and variable $x$; to recover the set we care about, we would have to take an intersection of infinitely many versions. That - well, an intersection of infinitely many open sets is not necessarily open.



        I don't see this approach working.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        (gdepaul's answer contains suggestions for alternate approaches. This one focuses on the idea laid out in the question)



        And where would you go from there? You went from a fixed $x$ and an infinite collection of $n$ to a fixed $n$ and variable $x$; to recover the set we care about, we would have to take an intersection of infinitely many versions. That - well, an intersection of infinitely many open sets is not necessarily open.



        I don't see this approach working.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 17 '18 at 4:24









        jmerryjmerry

        4,334514




        4,334514






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043511%2fprove-that-the-set-used-in-archimedean-property-is-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna