Why does a Turing machine take $n^k$ steps for computing an input?
$begingroup$
I was reading about Cook's Theorem for Turing machine. In its proof, it is said that the Turing machine would take at most $n^k$ steps (where $k$ is an integer and $k > 0$) to compute an input of length $n$.
This is probably assuming that the Turing machine does halt for the given input. It further says that we as there are at most $n^k$ steps, we don't need an infinite tape. A tape with $n^k$ elements is sufficient as the turning machine would not travel more than that.
Why do we say the Turing Machine needs at most $n^k$ steps?
turing-machines
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading about Cook's Theorem for Turing machine. In its proof, it is said that the Turing machine would take at most $n^k$ steps (where $k$ is an integer and $k > 0$) to compute an input of length $n$.
This is probably assuming that the Turing machine does halt for the given input. It further says that we as there are at most $n^k$ steps, we don't need an infinite tape. A tape with $n^k$ elements is sufficient as the turning machine would not travel more than that.
Why do we say the Turing Machine needs at most $n^k$ steps?
turing-machines
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading about Cook's Theorem for Turing machine. In its proof, it is said that the Turing machine would take at most $n^k$ steps (where $k$ is an integer and $k > 0$) to compute an input of length $n$.
This is probably assuming that the Turing machine does halt for the given input. It further says that we as there are at most $n^k$ steps, we don't need an infinite tape. A tape with $n^k$ elements is sufficient as the turning machine would not travel more than that.
Why do we say the Turing Machine needs at most $n^k$ steps?
turing-machines
$endgroup$
I was reading about Cook's Theorem for Turing machine. In its proof, it is said that the Turing machine would take at most $n^k$ steps (where $k$ is an integer and $k > 0$) to compute an input of length $n$.
This is probably assuming that the Turing machine does halt for the given input. It further says that we as there are at most $n^k$ steps, we don't need an infinite tape. A tape with $n^k$ elements is sufficient as the turning machine would not travel more than that.
Why do we say the Turing Machine needs at most $n^k$ steps?
turing-machines
turing-machines
edited Dec 17 '18 at 5:21
Hans Hüttel
3,1972921
3,1972921
asked Dec 17 '18 at 5:06
Sukumar GaonkarSukumar Gaonkar
61
61
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Cook's Theorem is a theorem in the theory of computational complexity. Here, we are only interested in Turing machines whose time complexity is well-defined. This can only be the case for Turing machines that always halt.
Cook's Theorem states that the language
$$mathrm{SAT} = { langle phi rangle mid phi ; text{is a satisfiable formula in propositional logic}}$$
is NP-complete. To show this, we must show that for any language $L in mathrm{NP}$, $L$ polynomial-time reduces to $mathrm{SAT}$.
But since $L in mathrm{NP}$, we know that there exists a nondeterministic Turing machine $M$ that decides $L$ and has polynomial time complexity. That is, we know there exists a $k > 0$ such that $M$ will never use more than $n^k$ steps for any input of size $k$. Within $n^k$ steps, $M$ can only visit $n^k$ cells on its tape.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043547%2fwhy-does-a-turing-machine-take-nk-steps-for-computing-an-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Cook's Theorem is a theorem in the theory of computational complexity. Here, we are only interested in Turing machines whose time complexity is well-defined. This can only be the case for Turing machines that always halt.
Cook's Theorem states that the language
$$mathrm{SAT} = { langle phi rangle mid phi ; text{is a satisfiable formula in propositional logic}}$$
is NP-complete. To show this, we must show that for any language $L in mathrm{NP}$, $L$ polynomial-time reduces to $mathrm{SAT}$.
But since $L in mathrm{NP}$, we know that there exists a nondeterministic Turing machine $M$ that decides $L$ and has polynomial time complexity. That is, we know there exists a $k > 0$ such that $M$ will never use more than $n^k$ steps for any input of size $k$. Within $n^k$ steps, $M$ can only visit $n^k$ cells on its tape.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cook's Theorem is a theorem in the theory of computational complexity. Here, we are only interested in Turing machines whose time complexity is well-defined. This can only be the case for Turing machines that always halt.
Cook's Theorem states that the language
$$mathrm{SAT} = { langle phi rangle mid phi ; text{is a satisfiable formula in propositional logic}}$$
is NP-complete. To show this, we must show that for any language $L in mathrm{NP}$, $L$ polynomial-time reduces to $mathrm{SAT}$.
But since $L in mathrm{NP}$, we know that there exists a nondeterministic Turing machine $M$ that decides $L$ and has polynomial time complexity. That is, we know there exists a $k > 0$ such that $M$ will never use more than $n^k$ steps for any input of size $k$. Within $n^k$ steps, $M$ can only visit $n^k$ cells on its tape.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cook's Theorem is a theorem in the theory of computational complexity. Here, we are only interested in Turing machines whose time complexity is well-defined. This can only be the case for Turing machines that always halt.
Cook's Theorem states that the language
$$mathrm{SAT} = { langle phi rangle mid phi ; text{is a satisfiable formula in propositional logic}}$$
is NP-complete. To show this, we must show that for any language $L in mathrm{NP}$, $L$ polynomial-time reduces to $mathrm{SAT}$.
But since $L in mathrm{NP}$, we know that there exists a nondeterministic Turing machine $M$ that decides $L$ and has polynomial time complexity. That is, we know there exists a $k > 0$ such that $M$ will never use more than $n^k$ steps for any input of size $k$. Within $n^k$ steps, $M$ can only visit $n^k$ cells on its tape.
$endgroup$
Cook's Theorem is a theorem in the theory of computational complexity. Here, we are only interested in Turing machines whose time complexity is well-defined. This can only be the case for Turing machines that always halt.
Cook's Theorem states that the language
$$mathrm{SAT} = { langle phi rangle mid phi ; text{is a satisfiable formula in propositional logic}}$$
is NP-complete. To show this, we must show that for any language $L in mathrm{NP}$, $L$ polynomial-time reduces to $mathrm{SAT}$.
But since $L in mathrm{NP}$, we know that there exists a nondeterministic Turing machine $M$ that decides $L$ and has polynomial time complexity. That is, we know there exists a $k > 0$ such that $M$ will never use more than $n^k$ steps for any input of size $k$. Within $n^k$ steps, $M$ can only visit $n^k$ cells on its tape.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 5:27
Hans HüttelHans Hüttel
3,1972921
3,1972921
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043547%2fwhy-does-a-turing-machine-take-nk-steps-for-computing-an-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown