Solving a question with more unknowns than equations












0












$begingroup$


I am not sure if I am thick in the head or not, but I am trying to replicate this paper: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19086.pdf. The equations characterising the equilibrium are given on Page $22$.



Unfortunately it seems as though there are 7 unknowns but only 6 equations (well I am trying to calculate the steady state, so for any time varying variable $X$ which is time varying $X_{t+1} = X_t = X$ and thats how it becomes only 7 unknowns.)



The unknowns are:
$widetilde{K}, widetilde{Q}, widetilde{C}, widetilde{Y},tau_k,tau_l and L$



I am omitting the time subscripts because I am trying to solve for the steady state, so again, variables are constant through time.



I tried going through the paper again and how we got to the equations but to no avail. I may be missing something super basic here but any help would be great!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What are the unknowns? $K,Q,C,Y$ with subscripts $t$ and $t+1$? which variable are you referring to as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 8:14












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan Hi, I have edited in some more information into the answers. X is just an example variable, but but it applies to all the variables with the subscript t in the system of equations. I've listed the unknowns above.
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The variables are normalized, so if you want $Q_{t+1}=Q_t$, wouldn't $widetilde{Q}_{t+1} = frac{Q_{t+1}}{Q_t} = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 9:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan You're a genius. That was quite silly of me! Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems to me that $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ are policy instruments. The definition of equilibrium takes them as given. You then look for $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ that solve some objective of the planner/government.
    $endgroup$
    – Mdoc
    Jan 10 at 6:39
















0












$begingroup$


I am not sure if I am thick in the head or not, but I am trying to replicate this paper: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19086.pdf. The equations characterising the equilibrium are given on Page $22$.



Unfortunately it seems as though there are 7 unknowns but only 6 equations (well I am trying to calculate the steady state, so for any time varying variable $X$ which is time varying $X_{t+1} = X_t = X$ and thats how it becomes only 7 unknowns.)



The unknowns are:
$widetilde{K}, widetilde{Q}, widetilde{C}, widetilde{Y},tau_k,tau_l and L$



I am omitting the time subscripts because I am trying to solve for the steady state, so again, variables are constant through time.



I tried going through the paper again and how we got to the equations but to no avail. I may be missing something super basic here but any help would be great!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What are the unknowns? $K,Q,C,Y$ with subscripts $t$ and $t+1$? which variable are you referring to as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 8:14












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan Hi, I have edited in some more information into the answers. X is just an example variable, but but it applies to all the variables with the subscript t in the system of equations. I've listed the unknowns above.
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The variables are normalized, so if you want $Q_{t+1}=Q_t$, wouldn't $widetilde{Q}_{t+1} = frac{Q_{t+1}}{Q_t} = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 9:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan You're a genius. That was quite silly of me! Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems to me that $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ are policy instruments. The definition of equilibrium takes them as given. You then look for $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ that solve some objective of the planner/government.
    $endgroup$
    – Mdoc
    Jan 10 at 6:39














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am not sure if I am thick in the head or not, but I am trying to replicate this paper: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19086.pdf. The equations characterising the equilibrium are given on Page $22$.



Unfortunately it seems as though there are 7 unknowns but only 6 equations (well I am trying to calculate the steady state, so for any time varying variable $X$ which is time varying $X_{t+1} = X_t = X$ and thats how it becomes only 7 unknowns.)



The unknowns are:
$widetilde{K}, widetilde{Q}, widetilde{C}, widetilde{Y},tau_k,tau_l and L$



I am omitting the time subscripts because I am trying to solve for the steady state, so again, variables are constant through time.



I tried going through the paper again and how we got to the equations but to no avail. I may be missing something super basic here but any help would be great!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am not sure if I am thick in the head or not, but I am trying to replicate this paper: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19086.pdf. The equations characterising the equilibrium are given on Page $22$.



Unfortunately it seems as though there are 7 unknowns but only 6 equations (well I am trying to calculate the steady state, so for any time varying variable $X$ which is time varying $X_{t+1} = X_t = X$ and thats how it becomes only 7 unknowns.)



The unknowns are:
$widetilde{K}, widetilde{Q}, widetilde{C}, widetilde{Y},tau_k,tau_l and L$



I am omitting the time subscripts because I am trying to solve for the steady state, so again, variables are constant through time.



I tried going through the paper again and how we got to the equations but to no avail. I may be missing something super basic here but any help would be great!







ordinary-differential-equations economics steady-state






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 9:20









Sauhard Sharma

953318




953318










asked Jan 8 at 7:47









HariharanHariharan

312




312












  • $begingroup$
    What are the unknowns? $K,Q,C,Y$ with subscripts $t$ and $t+1$? which variable are you referring to as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 8:14












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan Hi, I have edited in some more information into the answers. X is just an example variable, but but it applies to all the variables with the subscript t in the system of equations. I've listed the unknowns above.
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The variables are normalized, so if you want $Q_{t+1}=Q_t$, wouldn't $widetilde{Q}_{t+1} = frac{Q_{t+1}}{Q_t} = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 9:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan You're a genius. That was quite silly of me! Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems to me that $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ are policy instruments. The definition of equilibrium takes them as given. You then look for $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ that solve some objective of the planner/government.
    $endgroup$
    – Mdoc
    Jan 10 at 6:39


















  • $begingroup$
    What are the unknowns? $K,Q,C,Y$ with subscripts $t$ and $t+1$? which variable are you referring to as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 8:14












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan Hi, I have edited in some more information into the answers. X is just an example variable, but but it applies to all the variables with the subscript t in the system of equations. I've listed the unknowns above.
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The variables are normalized, so if you want $Q_{t+1}=Q_t$, wouldn't $widetilde{Q}_{t+1} = frac{Q_{t+1}}{Q_t} = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 9:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan You're a genius. That was quite silly of me! Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hariharan
    Jan 8 at 9:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems to me that $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ are policy instruments. The definition of equilibrium takes them as given. You then look for $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ that solve some objective of the planner/government.
    $endgroup$
    – Mdoc
    Jan 10 at 6:39
















$begingroup$
What are the unknowns? $K,Q,C,Y$ with subscripts $t$ and $t+1$? which variable are you referring to as $X$?
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 8 at 8:14






$begingroup$
What are the unknowns? $K,Q,C,Y$ with subscripts $t$ and $t+1$? which variable are you referring to as $X$?
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 8 at 8:14














$begingroup$
@Dylan Hi, I have edited in some more information into the answers. X is just an example variable, but but it applies to all the variables with the subscript t in the system of equations. I've listed the unknowns above.
$endgroup$
– Hariharan
Jan 8 at 9:05




$begingroup$
@Dylan Hi, I have edited in some more information into the answers. X is just an example variable, but but it applies to all the variables with the subscript t in the system of equations. I've listed the unknowns above.
$endgroup$
– Hariharan
Jan 8 at 9:05




1




1




$begingroup$
The variables are normalized, so if you want $Q_{t+1}=Q_t$, wouldn't $widetilde{Q}_{t+1} = frac{Q_{t+1}}{Q_t} = 1$?
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 8 at 9:35






$begingroup$
The variables are normalized, so if you want $Q_{t+1}=Q_t$, wouldn't $widetilde{Q}_{t+1} = frac{Q_{t+1}}{Q_t} = 1$?
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 8 at 9:35














$begingroup$
@Dylan You're a genius. That was quite silly of me! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hariharan
Jan 8 at 9:58




$begingroup$
@Dylan You're a genius. That was quite silly of me! Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hariharan
Jan 8 at 9:58




1




1




$begingroup$
Seems to me that $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ are policy instruments. The definition of equilibrium takes them as given. You then look for $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ that solve some objective of the planner/government.
$endgroup$
– Mdoc
Jan 10 at 6:39




$begingroup$
Seems to me that $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ are policy instruments. The definition of equilibrium takes them as given. You then look for $tau_l$ and $tau_k$ that solve some objective of the planner/government.
$endgroup$
– Mdoc
Jan 10 at 6:39










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065901%2fsolving-a-question-with-more-unknowns-than-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065901%2fsolving-a-question-with-more-unknowns-than-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna